Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Special report: The homeless struggle
Tent city: Back to site one
The homeless camp would return to its original site under stricter rules for 90 days.
By ALISA ULFERTS
Published March 1, 2007
ST. PETERSBURG - The community of homeless people clustered in tents near downtown would be moved one more time under an agreement announced Wednesday. Working in conjunction with advocates for the homeless and groups that provide them with services, city officials intend to relocate the impromptu tent city - now on 18th Street - back to the empty lot it occupied on Fourth Avenue N before the city shut it down in January. If City Council members agree in a workshop scheduled for today, the city will issue a temporary use permit waiving prohibitions against living in tents. No more than 75 tents would be permitted for no more than 90 days while more permanent housing was sought. "This is for a limited number of tents and a limited period of time," Mayor Rick Baker said Wednesday at a press conference. The city also intends to tighten its ordinances to prohibit any more tents from being pitched in the public right of way. Temporarily moving the tent city from its current sprawling location on the public right of way to an enclosed lot owned by the St. Vincent de Paul Society was an option that got strong support last week at a homeless summit sponsored by the city. Attendees of the summit - which included business, neighborhood and homeless leaders - also voiced a desire for the city to close certain loopholes in local ordinances that allow camping in the public right of way. City Council members today will consider changes to city ordinances, including adding prohibitions against sleeping in right of way that is adjacent to residential property, tents in any right of way, and sleeping in the right of way when the individual has been offered space in a shelter. Those changes will require public hearings, and final approval would take several weeks. But council members could vote today on granting the permit to move tent city. If they do, the tent city could be moved as early as Friday. The city will coordinate 24-hour security, access to services, toilets and a buffer to protect nearby neighbors, said Deputy Mayor Goliath Davis. Asked why city leaders are willing to waive the tent prohibitions when they weren't before, Baker said this time around all parties are on the same page, working toward a solution. "When St. Petersburg has a problem, this is how we deal with it. We meet and we talk," Baker said, referring to the summit. Pat Waltrich of the St. Vincent de Paul Society agreed that there was more cooperation on all sides, which made her organization willing to allow its lot to be used again. "It's a collaborative effort," Waltrich said. Eric Rubin, an advocate who has represented the residents of the tent city, said he polled the tenters and that they unanimously agreed to the move and the conditions attached to it. Homeless in crisis December 2006: Tents begin appearing across the street from the St. Vincent de Paul center. They soon move to a tent city formed on a lot on Fourth Avenue N. Jan. 5: City orders the tent city shut down and offers services to help relocate. Not all are helped, and some return their tents to the old site. Jan. 17: Two homeless men are slain within an hour of each other. Jan. 19: Police slash tents of homeless camped out near St. Vincent center. The slashing is caught on tape and posted on YouTube. Jan. 30: Mayor Rick Baker announces a five-point plan to resettle tent city residents. Feb. 6: Police arrest 2 men in connection with the slayings. Feb. 24: City holds summit on homelessness.
[Last modified March 1, 2007, 06:01:31]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Devin
|
05/08/07 08:20 AM
|
|
If you think about it, they(the city) has handled it pretty good.I visited St. Petersburg recently as it is touted America's most livable city.Time to go see how many folks really want a job.
|
|
by Buzz
|
03/17/07 03:52 PM
|
|
If you think about it, they(the city) has handled it pretty good. I feel for the homeless. But I also feel for city and private home owners who bust there butts work hard for there money and property. There has to be a solution without hurting every1
|
|
by Nick
|
03/15/07 02:06 PM
|
|
I am dissappointed in the lack of compassion my neibors have for other human beings. Relapse and insane behavior is characteristic of addiction and mental health issues. Let the down and out have their piece of dirt and be greatful you have your's.
|
|
by billy
|
03/14/07 09:15 AM
|
|
i think hobos should have eincome help.
|
|
by Joe
|
03/12/07 10:33 PM
|
|
I visited St. Petersburg recently as it is touted America's most livable city. It was awful. All I saw was homeless people. You need to fix this problem to savy your City. Who would possibly want to live there or even visti.
|
|
by Stanley
|
03/02/07 03:09 PM
|
|
my neighbor showed me this 'comments' page, so here i go: i've given to churches/charities/thrift stores. i am not wealthy, but i manage to keep a comfortable home and savings. i want to see the poor get help, but i don't want to see the 'players'.
|
|
by Sonia
|
03/02/07 01:55 PM
|
|
I work 4 days & am looking to fill my weekends. Goal: deposit for a small mobile home in senior park. It will happen. I am homeless but functional and saving $$. Each day I witness the chronic-drunken homeless (men)pull the wool over your eyes!
|
|
by Steve
|
03/02/07 01:54 PM
|
|
I'm a resident in downtown Tarpon Springs. I hope the residents here start taking a good look at our homeless situation instead of 'inviting' the homeless here. I hear many homeless say they "love" Tarpon! Churches/charities make it easy here!
|
|
by John Gaston
|
03/01/07 07:09 PM
|
|
i'm 37, made some poor judgements, but am back on track with a job. i feel good about myself and will remain so. i need assistance with housing so that i can stay healthy. living outdoors takes its toll sometimes, then i rent a room. this costs$$$$$
|
|
by Steve Bellows
|
03/01/07 06:53 PM
|
|
i'm tired of hearing about the homeless that are the drunks/addicts and carefree's. why are we not doing something for those out there that work or want to work but need shelter for proper rest, belongings, and safety?
|
|
by pete
|
03/01/07 06:11 PM
|
|
Time to go see how many folks really want a job. Drive by those lazy shameless folks sleeping mid day on 5th ave north. This city will soon be known as the City of brotherly piss
|
|
by Ann Greeley
|
03/01/07 05:12 PM
|
|
Drunken, slobbering homeless that are 'in our face' have taken up enough publicity, money, wasted donations of all kinds, and still not doing anything to show they want to be part of mainstream America. Yet, the sober, willing NEEDY are put on hold.
|
|
by Duggan
|
03/01/07 05:05 PM
|
|
What I'd like to see: Charities reach out to the homeless that work, the one's that are returning to work, and the one's that need assistance to get back to work. These (just mentioned) homeless are NOT the drunks we're spending all this time on.
|
|
by Kay
|
03/01/07 05:00 PM
|
|
Maybe it is time that I write a letter to the stpetetimes with my story. How I desperately tried to get help in my ninth month of pregnancy. There is not the help available (before homeless) that some of you think. Thank God these people are fed.
|
|
by Zina
|
03/01/07 04:58 PM
|
|
Yes, there are homeless that are working. They are sleeping in areas not to be found by the police. They are determined to get back to having a home again. I know a few. But the chronic that are making headlines are laughing in our faces & loving it.
|
|
by Mike
|
03/01/07 02:59 PM
|
|
Something must be done. There are a lot of people living paycheck to paycheck and aren๒019t that far from being homeless. If we stop paying for a illegal war and start helping Americans we can solve this problem.
|
|
by John
|
03/01/07 01:50 PM
|
|
Send the professional advocates home and the situation will end. Those who want help get it, while this manufactured crisis has only empowered the worst of the chronically homeless. Other homeless are too busy looking for work. NO MORE HANDOUTS!
|
|
by Chuck Merle
|
03/01/07 12:35 PM
|
|
When I hit hard times, I couldn't get assistance like the homeless are being offered. No use complaining now. I read homeless are given $25 gift cards, daily bus passes & MORE, to get them to some work/program. Waste of time/money.
Labor camps?
|
|
by Shane
|
03/01/07 12:13 PM
|
|
When are we going to help the poor that have recently hit hard times. I'm talking about people who could not get assistance for one reason or another. Mistakes, oversights and bad luck happen. Unlike the chronic out there, needy people want to work.
|
|
by Richie
|
03/01/07 11:45 AM
|
|
A good step would be in getting rid of the cheap motels along 34th st.and 4th st.No tourists stay in these,they cater to mostly homeless.If these motels go the homeless will go.
|
|
by Shirley
|
03/01/07 11:22 AM
|
|
Most social problems are left to social workers who have little more clout than those they seek to help. Where are the "BIG BOYS???" If you chase the almighty dollar, you have no business trying to regulate those who have absolutely nothing. tents?
|
|
by Joe
|
03/01/07 11:01 AM
|
|
Are Mayor Baker and Stanton over in Largo friends. Was just curious if they were going to have the operation together. Or has Baker already had his.
|
|
by Lisa
|
03/01/07 10:53 AM
|
|
May GOD have mercy on you if any of you ever wrestle with mental/medical problems, addiction, and/or loss of employment that puts you out of house and home.
|
|
by Tracy
|
03/01/07 10:48 AM
|
|
What makes people think that none of the homeless are working? A lot of them are working min. wage jobs that don't allow for housing and utilities. I know these folks and help them out every day. Get your facts straight before you post your thoughts!
|
|
by Ryan
|
03/01/07 10:47 AM
|
|
I am so frustrated with this city. What a joke. These bums, they are not homeless so I wish they would stopped being called that, are taking this city and driving it right into the ground. Any city official who supports this needs to be voted out!
|
|
by Lisa
|
03/01/07 10:47 AM
|
|
What happens after 90 days? What plans are out there to assist these people? Just pretending they are not there will not work.
|
|
by Cory
|
03/01/07 10:32 AM
|
|
Mayor Baker, you have turned into the biggest wimp. I've noticed you have not been on tv lately telling everybody what a great day to be in St. Pete, maybe because that would be a bunch of garbage! Stand up and get a pair while you still have a chanc
|
|
by mike
|
03/01/07 10:02 AM
|
|
GET OUT THE BOXCUTTERS!!
|
|
by Jane
|
03/01/07 09:51 AM
|
|
There are reasons there are so many homeless...the economy, emotional problems, etc. I am appauled there is so little compassion for these folks. This could happen to anyone!
|
|
by Allen
|
03/01/07 09:48 AM
|
|
For Sam: Not the Everglades please we have already done enough damage there.
|
|
by Jim
|
03/01/07 09:36 AM
|
|
OK. They want to camp out put them in the woods where no one can see them or have to see them relieve themselves.I am sure the city of St. Pete has some wooded land somewhere so they won't bother the taxpaying people. Give em a hand up not a hand out
|
|
by TOM
|
03/01/07 09:26 AM
|
|
Send them over to Downtown Tampa's Sacred Heart Church where they can sleep on the steps.
|
|
by Jeremy
|
03/01/07 09:23 AM
|
|
Of course they are in favor of moving back into downtown St. Pete...there are far more people for panhandling there than where they were...this is a joke...anyone who wants help, will help themselves, everyone else is looking for a handout!
|
|
by Kim
|
03/01/07 09:16 AM
|
|
I am disappointed that the city is allowing this. I support the tent destoying incident & think staying tough is the only way to get these people to work for a change in their own lives.
|
|
by John C.
|
03/01/07 08:52 AM
|
|
The rest of us can't do what we like on the private property that we own. We're supposed to protect illegal activities of people who squat on someone else's property?
|
|