St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Governor feels hit of tax inequity

By STEVE BOUSQUET
Published March 1, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

TALLAHASSEE - For Gov. Charlie Crist, the quirks in the Florida property tax system have literally hit home.

And it's even worse for Crist's landlord.

The governor, who rents a high-rise condominium in downtown St. Petersburg's Bayfront Tower, got socked with a 25 percent rent increase after his landlord lost the protection of the Save Our Homes tax cap.

That's the cap that Crist and lawmakers have decided is long overdue for a change because of the inequities it has spawned between homeowners who stay put and those who move, or between homeowners and business owners.

In Crist's case, it's the landlord's fault. Condo owner Lawrence Compton was illegally claiming the $25,000 homestead exemption on the condo, even though he didn't live there.

When the Pinellas County property appraiser discovered that last year, he revoked Compton's homestead exemption, and that's when Compton's problems began.

Only owner-occupied or "homestead" properties in Florida are eligible for the Save Our Homes tax cap, which limits increases in property assessments to 3 percent a year.

In other words: no homestead exemption, no tax cap.

"Once you lose the cap, it goes to fair market value," said Property Appraiser Jim Smith.

Overnight, the taxable value of the governor's rented condo more than doubled, from $210,000 to $425,700.

Compton's property tax bill ballooned from $5,131 to $9,857 - even though the collective property tax rate in Pinellas declined from 2005 to 2006.

Compton passed on a big chunk of his higher tax bill to his tenant, Crist.

Crist said Compton increased his rent from $1,200 a month to $1,500 for a condo he uses mostly only on weekends.

"It's hitting everybody, owners and renters alike," Crist said.

The 1,300-square-foot condo, built in 1975, is on Bayfront Tower's 22nd floor and overlooks Tampa Bay.

Even though Crist now has a rent-free house known as the Governor's Mansion in Tallahassee, he said he has no plans to give up the condo he has rented since 2003.

"This is where my family is. It's home. It's where I vote," Crist said.

The magnitude of a $10,000 tax bill on a small 30-year-old condo is even greater when Compton's situation is compared to his neighbors'.

Just down the hall is an owner-occupied unit that is much larger than Compton's, but the owners have had the benefit of the tax cap at least since 1996, according to tax records.

The market value of their bigger unit is slightly higher than Compton's, but with the cushion of the tax cap, Steven and Joan Lozanoff's condo is assessed at $96,540. Their taxes were $2,235 last year, or about one-fifth what Compton had to pay.

Steve Bousquet can be reached at bousquet@sptimes.com or 850 224-7263.

Fast Facts:

Homestead exemption's effect

Here's what happened to the property tax bill on Gov. Charlie Crist's rented St. Petersburg condo in Bayfront Tower, above, after Crist's landlord lost his Save Our Homes tax cap:

2005 2006

Market value $296,900 $425,700

Taxable value $210,000 $425,000

Property taxes $5,131.18 $9,857.17

Millage rate 24.4342 23.1552

Source: Pinellas County Property Appraiser

[Last modified March 1, 2007, 01:06:42]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by james 04/10/07 12:58 PM
I've been in Tampa renting for almost a year and I'm ready to buy a house.The problem-high property tax making it too much to buy.Increase sales tax/lowering property tax would be fair for both new and old residents.Either I stay renting or go to OH.
by paul 03/23/07 11:45 AM
i agree the landlord should be fined & jailed but this just one small incident. a rollback will not cure the inequities created by the cap. sales tax will make everyone pay the same and share the burden. isn't that the intent of taxes and insurance?
by Tim 03/20/07 07:23 PM
How much will we loose on fed. taxes if we can not get a deduction on Ptax because there is none. How about increasing sales tax by 1.5% and reducing not eliminating Ptaxes accordingly. This would shift the burden some without chasing away tourists.
by John 03/02/07 05:41 PM
Everyone should pay their share for services including renters and tourists. The 2.5% idea is a good one. A poll just out, shows 67% out of 474 respondents like the no property tax idea. I say put it on the ballot and let the voter's decide.
by John 03/02/07 05:26 PM
Everyone stop. The guy committed fraud. He paid the back taxes and penalties. The problem is that renters are paying for the high property taxes too contrary to what papers have been saying. The 2.5% sales tax idea is the way to go. We all benefit.
by g 03/02/07 11:52 AM
I have to agree with b, Joe, and Helen,the landlord is at fault here and should pay all of the back taxes, including a fine. Why isn't he in jail? Anyone else would be! We have a small rental and there is no way its worth what its assessed at!
by Gayle 03/02/07 10:39 AM
I believe everyone should have to pay something in taxes. We all live here, don't we? Most of who uses the roads are the ones staying home (not bringing in income) How am I going to be able to keep my home when I get old? I guess I continue to work
by tired of paying for people who stay at home 03/02/07 10:35 AM
If the sales tax increased, at least everyone would have to "chip in" to pay for libraries and parks. My husband and I don't use either.
by Gayle 03/02/07 10:34 AM
We moved into our newly built "dream" home in 2004. Immediately our taxes doubled. We lived in our old home for 18yrs, yet we lost the homestead exemption once we moved to the other side of town. We have worked many years for this house & for what?
by Diane 03/01/07 09:38 PM
Compton should have to pay the appropriate RE taxes for the entire period that he defrauded the government and other honest tax payers by obtaining a homestead exemption that he was not qualified to receive.
by Jorge 03/01/07 09:23 PM
Does not the owner have to pay penalties for his fraud?
by sandy 03/01/07 05:44 PM
I think a sales tax is the only fair way to go. Quit talking a do it.
by Tina 03/01/07 04:37 PM
By raising the sales tax many in modest homes that they have lived in years will end up paying more in taxes then they do now. Governments need to cut spending not play a shells game with them. Work in a budget like everyone else does or should.
by Daniel 03/01/07 02:35 PM
Go back to 2003 valuations on property and raise the homestead to 40K. The millage rate could be lower also. DON'T RAISE SALES TAX.
by Joe 03/01/07 01:05 PM
Taxes will never go down. Name one time when taxes went down on a state level
by Jennifer 03/01/07 12:37 PM
My husband and I are landlords for now, but we will be selling as soon as the housing market turns because it is no longer worth paying the high taxes/insurance. It is not worth being burdened with houses in Flordia.
by knuckle 03/01/07 12:35 PM
You should have increased Crists rent the same percentage your tax bill increased. Then he would have understood the true impact of SOH. Cut all property taxes to 1995 rates plus the 3% increase/year to get to 2007 taxes.
by Chris 03/01/07 10:54 AM
Christine - How would raising the sales tax rate create cheaters? I own a retail business & have no clue how it would be possible to cheat on sales tax rates. The rate is what it is, you buy something, you pay the rate & I remit it to the state.
by Allen 03/01/07 10:52 AM
Will the owner of the condo be prosecuted for lying about his homestead exemption? If not, why not?
by Diane 03/01/07 09:43 AM
My rent on my POS apartment goes up every time we renew our lease. We have cracks in the walls, crappy windows and neighbors who don't care about anything except butting into your business. I'd love to move! But to where?
by Dale 03/01/07 09:07 AM
What would the tax rate be in St Petersburg if we all were assessed at fair market value. I would guess that it would drop considerably and may fall in line with national averages.
by Christine 03/01/07 09:03 AM
Why would politicians want to eliminate the propety tax. It is the only tax system that is even close to assuring 100% collection. When you raise the sales or income tax rates you create more cheaters.
by Ken 03/01/07 09:03 AM
Your newspaper should compare residential millage rates in St Petersburg with other out-of-state cities of similar size. I think you find we are much higher.Why would a business relocate here given the high tax rate. "Save our homes" needs to go.
by Ron 03/01/07 08:56 AM
The politcians can do all the tweaking they want, but the only fair solution is to revoke the "Save our Homes" amendment.
by sick of it 03/01/07 08:47 AM
Oh BOO HOO! Wait until the Gov gets his auto insurance policy with a Hurricane Cat. fund surcharge slapped on it.
by B 03/01/07 08:13 AM
Surprise, Surprise, the problem is not the Cap, the Property Tax Rate, or even the Homestead, but the greedy landlord, that broke the law and falsified documents to claim an exemption that he was not entitled. He should pay all back taxes and fines.
by Joe 03/01/07 08:09 AM
The owner commited fraud and should have to pay back taxes. I do not feel sorry for him. The owner should be seeing the court system if you ask me. Fraud the IRS and see if you don't go to jail
by Helen 03/01/07 08:04 AM
This owner is lucky, he can pass the rise on to the tenant. Those of us with low income rentals have to absorb these crazy increases.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT