St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Residents stand up for springs

By ELENA LESLEY
Published March 3, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

CRYSTAL RIVER - Residents packed the City Council chambers Thursday to express concerns about proposed development on Three Sisters Springs.

More than 300 single and multi-family units are slated for construction on Crystal River's most coveted piece of undeveloped waterfront. The Planning Commission held its first public hearing Thursday to gather input. Residents had plenty to contribute.

"There could be real dire consequences," said Ralph DuBall, who lives across the canal from the property. "We don't want to ruin a beautiful natural resource."

Kurt Woerner, the city's director of planning and community development, said he understands that residents have environmental concerns. But he added that owners have the right to develop the property.

"If it complies" with zoning and the comprehensive plan, "it will go through," he said.

For the most part, the proposed development does. Plans include 69 single-family units on the waterfront and townhomes abutting Kings Bay Drive and Cutler Spur.

According to Woerner's calculations, 100 additional units could easily fit on the property, given current zoning.

He said his primary concern was traffic management.

The main entrance is now platted for Kings Bay Drive; Woerner said he would prefer to see roadway access off Cutler Spur. So would neighbors who spoke Thursday.

"If you don't drive that roadway, you don't know how bad it is," said Charlie Kish, who lives on SE Second Place. "It could be a dangerous situation."

Others said they worried the property simply cannot handle such dense development.

"They have to put pilings down and the limerock could shatter or fracture," DuBall said. "That could block the flow of the springs."

Because of the numerous environmental concerns, Woerner said the city will proceed cautiously.

"We don't get two chances with this," he said. "Mediocrity is not an option."

The city hopes to apply for a state grant to purchase land immediately surrounding the springs. A conservation easement already protects some of that area, but its reach is minimal, Woerner said.

"We can't stop development," he said, "but we can control it."

Elena Lesley can be reached at elesley@sptimes.com or 564-3627.

[Last modified March 3, 2007, 00:00:44]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Steve 03/03/07 04:29 AM
I own property in the area, and stand to gain in an increase in my property value from this project, and I still do not want to see it go through. This kind of density just creates an urban style mess in a rural, natural setting.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT