Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Lethal injections are horribly flawed
A Times Editorial
Published March 4, 2007
The state of Florida says that only a licensed physician or podiatrist is qualified to deal with something as minor as an ingrown toenail. But to execute another human being, no medical training is necessary. In fact, the person who led the team that put to death Angel Diaz in December said he had no medical qualifications whatsoever. No one but a qualified expert with solid medical credentials should be engaged in the tricky and delicate process of administering lethal injections. And Diaz's botched execution puts an exclamation point on why. Witnesses say Diaz was clearly in pain during the 34 minutes he took to die - double the normal amount of time. While state officials deny it, others who attended the execution say Diaz looked to be struggling for breath and grimacing as the execution team pumped 14 syringes of chemicals and saline into him. With the needle insertions done badly, probably tearing through his veins, Diaz ended up with footlong chemical blisters on both arms. This would explain why Diaz took so long to die. The lethal three-drug cocktail had to be absorbed from his flesh through the bloodstream rather than move through intact veins . The medical examiner testifying before a state commission examining Florida's lethal injection protocols said that "none of the materials injected went to the right place." There is a strong possibility that Diaz suffered severely during the process. There is no way to know whether the sedative was working when the killer chemical was administered. Had it not been, Diaz would have felt like his flesh was on fire. A drug that largely paralyzed him would have kept him from screaming in pain. There was a moratorium on executions in the state pending the report and recommendations of the governor's Commission on Administration of Lethal Injection, which came out Thursday. But it doesn't take a study to know that the state should not be using a procedure so likely to cause pain that veterinarians won't use it to put down pets. And it doesn't take much common sense to know that only a medical professional should be administering lethal drugs. The commission's recommendations primarily ask that additional training, supervision and procedures be adopted for future lethal injections. Many of the recommendations are so basic that it is hard to believe they aren't part of current practice, such as making sure that each syringe is "appropriately labeled" with the name of the substance it contains. But the most important recommendation is the one suggesting that the three-drug chemical cocktail now used in executions be reconsidered. Pancrounin Bromide, the drug that paralyzes the inmate and makes it impossible to communicate pain, should not be used again. The commission recognized that the process requires "some qualified medical personnel" to accomplish "a humane and lawful execution." Since the Florida Medical Association and the American Medical Association bar physicians from taking a life in this manner, it might be difficult for the state to procure those services. That is another reason why the state should abolish capital punishment.
[Last modified March 4, 2007, 01:30:48]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Bill
|
03/07/07 08:45 PM
|
|
Diaz spent years in a cage, alone, anticipating his death. After years of mental torture who cares about 34 minutes of drugged discomfort? Hundreds of people on death row are proof that you need no special skills to kill someone.
|
|
by Susan
|
03/05/07 12:21 PM
|
|
Do people from St. Pete know about the risks of executing innocent people?
|
|
by Anita
|
03/05/07 01:11 AM
|
|
I agree with your editorial, especially as the qualifications conflict with that "job", but even more, It violates number 6 of the Ten Commandments: Thou shalt not Kill. "Whatsoever you do even unto the least of my brethryn so also you do unto me".
|
|
by msgatorslayer
|
03/04/07 10:53 PM
|
|
Bring back Old Sparkey!!!
|
|
by Carol
|
03/04/07 09:26 PM
|
|
"Pancrounin Bromide should not be used again." You are absolutely right. Only when paralytics are removed from the cocktail will the issue of whether the efficacy (or lack thereof) of the anesthestic prevents cruel and unusual be revealed.
|
|
by Andrew
|
03/04/07 05:30 PM
|
|
"Don't commit any capital crimes and you won't have to worry about it?" Tell that to all the innocent people who have spent years on death row! Tell that to the people who died because innocence was not grounds for post-conviction relief.
|
|
by G.W.
|
03/04/07 01:02 PM
|
|
Give me a break. These killers NEVER consider their victim's pain. Has this been just another GOOD OLD BOY EXCUSE within D-O-C not having QUALIFIED medical staff to administer the injections? Check I-R-S records. Executioner does not work for free.
|
|
by john
|
03/04/07 11:26 AM
|
|
go back to the chair, no problem
|
|
by KG
|
03/04/07 11:13 AM
|
|
the institution of capital punishment is horribly flawed. that a country that considers itself 'civilized' and 'christian' still belives in the efficacy of such a barbaric practice is incredible.
|
|
by JIm
|
03/04/07 09:30 AM
|
|
Poor baby, did he have any medical training when he butchered innocent people. An eye for an eye. Enough of the liberal spew!!!
|
|
by Chris
|
03/04/07 08:36 AM
|
|
Relax with the "put an end to capital punishment" Don't commit any capital crimes and you won't have to worry about it. Awww...the guy who was put to death may have suffered a little. Tough rocks, I hope he suffered a lot.
|
|
by Vic
|
03/04/07 08:26 AM
|
|
Who really cares if it is flawed? Who REALLY cares if those condemed to die SUFFER? I,for one,DO NOT.
|
|
by JD
|
03/04/07 08:25 AM
|
|
Once again, we are wasting time and money on an issue no one really cares a whit about. You want executions to be painless? A bullet to the head would be painless and very cost-effective.
|
|