St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Doctors in lawsuit now suing attorneys

By CARRIE WEIMAR
Published March 7, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

TAMPA - They got hammered with a record-breaking $217-million verdict for misdiagnosing a patient who suffered a stroke.

Now the doctors who were the target of that high-profile lawsuit are hoping to turn the tables. They're suing their attorneys.

Among the doctors' chief complaints: The attorneys turned down settlement offers of $1-million and $3-million, a fraction of the final judgment.

"This case should have never gone to trial," said D. Frank Winkles, who is representing Franklin, Favata & Hulls physicians group and Carrollwood Emergency Physicians.

"It should have settled. Those doctors were just hung out to dry," Winkles said.

The other doctor involved in the case, Michael Austin, is represented by Tampa attorney Barry Cohen, who said the lawsuit spoke for itself.

"The allegations are pretty clear," Cohen said.

The lawyers named in the suit, filed March 2 in Hillsborough Circuit Court, did not return telephone calls seeking comment.

The lawyers are Louis J. LaCava and Victor Guzman, who work for a West Palm Beach firm that also has a Tampa branch. Also named is Brian Stokes, who is with The Unger Law Group, which is based in Orlando.

The disagreement stems from a medical malpractice case decided by a Tampa jury in October.

Allan Navarro, a former pro basketball player in the Philippines, went to the University Community Hospital Carrollwood emergency room Aug. 9, 2000, complaining of nausea, headache, dizziness and double vision.

He was sent home five hours later with a painkiller prescription and a diagnosis of sinusitis.

No one realized Navarro was having a stroke. He returned to the hospital with more severe symptoms the next morning and underwent surgery hours later to relieve brain swelling. He ended up in a coma for three months and emerged from it permanently disabled.

Before his illness, Navarro was a machine operator earning just above minimum wage. Now he is confined to bed or must use a wheelchair.

Navarro's attorneys sued. Testimony revealed that an unlicensed physician's assistant initially examined Navarro, and Austin based his diagnosis on that exam.

After a three-week trial, jurors awarded Navarro, who was 50 at the time, $117-million for economic and pain and suffering damages. Then they ordered the doctors to pay $100.1-million in punitive damages.

Navarro's attorney, Steve Yerrid, said it was the largest jury verdict ever in Florida and the largest in the country that year.

Now the doctors are blaming the attorneys hired by their insurance company, ProNational Insurance, to represent them during Navarro's trial. In the lawsuit, they claim the lawyers were protecting the interests of the insurance company, not them.

For example, Austin said he was pressured by attorneys to say he always gave a patient a physical exam and patient history, even if one was already performed by a physician's assistant. Austin said he was told if that wasn't his testimony, his case would be "indefensible and that he would be looking at a $20-million judgment against him," according to the lawsuit.

But Austin said he didn't perform physicals on patients who had already been seen by a physician's assistant and he did not remember examining Navarro.

Despite Austin's protests, the insurance company's lawyers continued to deny that anyone except Austin was involved with Navarro's care and treatment, according to the suit.

Navarro's attorneys also made several attempts to settle the case, which were all rejected by the insurance company attorneys, the lawsuit said. The doctors said the proposed settlements were never adequately explained to them.

They accuse the attorneys of professional negligence, failing to properly advise them, fraudulently concealing information and failing to respond to settlement demands.

They are asking for damages, costs and "such additional relief as this court deems just and proper."

Carrie Weimar can be reached at 813 226-3416 or cweimar@sptimes.com.

[Last modified March 7, 2007, 00:48:36]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by gin 04/08/07 12:33 AM
I have anything positive to say about doctors as well I don't know where they get the education.In Poland doctor is a doctor.Here you're only practitioners (practicing), experimenting on people not a doctor's but sometimes your service is needed
by gen 04/08/07 12:03 AM
insurance sued me for fraud claiming that other people using my tree vehicles and that I'm using vehicle for commercial purposes,but I was able to beat them in court by myself.they were lying and they get caught on those lies and my English is not g
by goo 04/07/07 11:43 PM
insurance companies are very corrupted. Lawyers for the insurance companies are very corrupted to, they have investigators are nasty and corrupted as well.watch out if they don't like you for some reason, they make all kind of lies to hurt you.
by Bob 04/06/07 10:49 PM
I know the lawyers involved and they are very good. As a doctor and lawyer myself, the fault lies with the insurance companies. They decide when to settle, not the lawyers. ESPECIALLY with this company. You get what you pay for. I represent Docs . .
by Gen 04/06/07 02:04 PM
lawyers from insurance company are liars and they should be responsible for their action. They should know the low but seems to be you have to teach them to don't lie but they do anyway
by Sue 03/09/07 12:32 PM
I used to work for one of the law firms involved. Insurance companies refuse to listen to their own attorneys even when settlement is STRONGLY encouraged. I assure you that it will be well documented that settlement was encouraged and refused.
by Timmy 03/08/07 03:01 PM
Ironic...the docs complain and complain about frivolous lawsuits and now AFTER the Jury (heard all the facts) finds against them they file their own "frivolous" lawsuit...how does it feel doc?
by Mamoud 03/08/07 03:00 PM
I hope the lawyers and the patient collect of the monies the jurors gave them AND late fees, if any are due.
by El Gordo 03/08/07 02:57 PM
I'm sorry are we supposed to feel sorry for a Doctor who is NOW admitting his lie AFTER his lie didn't work...this Austin should suffer the same fate as Libby
by Dave 03/08/07 02:56 PM
Aaaah, such a 'good' attorney and fought so hard to "get" the insurance company to pay, haaaa that is bogus..all he would have had to do is put it in writing to his CLIENT, i.e., the doctor NOT the insurance company who was PAYING him drs. r stooges
by GiGi 03/08/07 02:52 PM
I love it, the doc admits he "shaded" his testimony because the lawyer told him to, and now we're supposed to believe anything he says...he's admitting to not being honest and now he wants everybody to believe him..his licesnse should be revoked
by don 03/08/07 02:49 PM
Next the poor docs will be suing the jurors, wonder if they ever thought to sue the silly insurance company that didnt settle it
by Leslie 03/08/07 09:39 AM
Laurie is absolutely correct. ProNational is one of the worst offenders. LaCava is actually a very good attorney. I'm sure his attorneys will show that he tried numerous times to get ProNational to pay, but they refused.
by laurie 03/08/07 07:15 AM
This particular insurance company gives its attorneys no authority to settle. they make the lawyers they hire to represent the doctor try every case even if it is indefensible. The attorneys comply because they don't want to lose the business.
by Jim 03/07/07 06:58 PM
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! It is the Insurance Companies that have been and always will be the problem. If they treated people fairly, attorneys would not be needed. Remember, they exist to make money, not pay claims!
by AnnH 03/07/07 06:39 PM
I'm not a doctor or P.A. but I would have atleast come to the conclusion of a migraine....not sinusitis...just proves that some people need to pay more attention in the classroom or during clinicals or what have you....
by Alex 03/07/07 05:00 PM
It was not the lawyer's fault - it is the client and his insurance carrier that make the final determination as to whether to accept a settlement offer. Why don't the docs sue the insurance carrier? Easy case to defend for the lawyers!
by jack s 03/07/07 03:36 PM
you think this is a mess, just wait until hospitalization insurance becomes mandatory.
by Joe 03/07/07 02:46 PM
How much of that has been paid to Allan Navarro. Who thinks he has been paid one red cent. I bet he is still waiting while this case goes on. Nice way to keep this going if you ask me.
by john 03/07/07 02:37 PM
As a plaintiff's atty, I can vouch for difficulty with ins co's in med mal cases--this one in particular. Even in clear cases they will not settle, even when the doctor demands. Under the ins policy, it is NOT the doctor's call. Live by the sword...
by Scott 03/07/07 01:59 PM
Paul, ya got it wrong. Malpractice insurance companies in Florida control the right to settle, not the docs. The insurance companies got that law passed several years ago.
by Warren 03/07/07 01:06 PM
Once again our greedy attorneys have proven why most of us HATE them. Look up the meaning of the word sleaze in the dictionary. I think it is now listed under the category 'attorney.'
by Ron 03/07/07 12:24 PM
So what, now the Doctors who failed to do their job correctly are saying the Lawyers did more wrong than they did?? They're lucky to still be Doctors.
by A 03/07/07 12:08 PM
I work in a law firm and something about the case sounds wrong. The clients are told all settlement deals, or are supposed to be...sounds like they either didn't want to pay the million or they were never told of it.
by Lucas 03/07/07 11:19 AM
now that Barry Cohen's involved everything must be on the up and up? Cohen will now character assassinate other lawyers. this should be fun
by Paul 03/07/07 11:14 AM
The client has the option to take any deal offered regardless of the lawyers suggestions. Either the attorney lied to his client in which case the doctor is justified in suing or the doctor elected to "roll the dice" and lost.
by Holly 03/07/07 10:23 AM
I agree with Pat!
by Jenny 03/07/07 09:12 AM
Wow Pat, guess you'll never need a doctor or a lawyer?
by David 03/07/07 07:13 AM
Three Fs when client comes into atty ofice-they place in atty hands- their Future, Fortune and their Freedom-settling cases rather than ego-building trials w/ large billing time-not good choice-lawyers' insu. co. will settle-good deal for all.
by pat 03/07/07 04:24 AM
wow, thieves suing thieves, whats next?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT