Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Coast Bank: Sue builder CCI, not us
The bank tries to distance itself from angry customers seeking loan relief.
By James Thorner
Published March 8, 2007
Threatened with lawsuits from scores of disgruntled customers, Coast Financial Holdings is deflecting anger towards the alleged source of its troubles: St. Petersburg builder Construction Compliance Inc. Since CCI announced this year its inability to deliver 482 homes in Sarasota County financed through Coast, customers have asked their lawyers to try to relieve construction loan debts totaling $70-million. But on Wednesday, bank spokesman and adviser Tramm Hudson said he considers the legal moves displaced. It's the builder, not the bank, that failed its end of the bargain. "They have other options," Hudson said of customers considering suing Coast. "They had a contract with a builder who defaulted on them. We were the lender; we were not the originator of the deal." The decision to distance itself from CCI is part of Coast's strategy to resolve a standoff that threatens the $670-million community bank's survival as an independent business. When Coast and CCI's troubles became public Jan. 19, Coast took a hard line: CCI customers must repay their loans in full, including interest CCI failed to pay during construction. The bank is sounding a bit more conciliatory these days. It's provided a list of builders for the 265 homes abandoned partway through construction and strapped with liens from unpaid contractors. Most recently Coast has offered discounts of $10,000 if customers pay off the loans in one swoop. One proposed replacement for CCI, Enchanted Homes in Fort Myers, said it plans to assume work on 12 houses. Most are near completion and missing appliances, carpets and other finishing touches. "My intention is to go in and clean it up," Enchanted owner Tom Gillespie said of the busted CCI deals. CCI customers, some sitting on vacant lots on which they owe $85,000, have approached such offers warily. They include investor Mike Wood, a Zephyrhills medical device salesman with contracts on two CCI houses. "My attorney told me don't start construction, don't sign anything, don't move forward until we get though the first round of negotiating with the bank," Wood said. CCI president Jesse Battle III couldn't be reached for comment. In a move this week toward possible dissolution, CCI sold its headquarters at 646 First Ave. S. in St. Petersburg. In previous interviews, CCI representatives have denied Coast played as passive a role in the deals as Hudson contends. CCI singled out Phil Coon, the Coast executive in charge of residential lending, for pushing so many deals that CCI couldn't keep up. Coast fired Coon and his wife, Melissa, last month, the only bank executives to lose their jobs in the CCI affair.
[Last modified March 7, 2007, 22:57:16]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Rosina
|
03/30/07 11:49 AM
|
|
The bank is absolutly at fault with the builder, if not more....they were supposed to pay the builder as he built the homes, step by step, not pay him in full.
|
|
by Joe
|
03/16/07 03:55 PM
|
|
It is hard to believe that Coast is not at fault & that 482 investors picked the exact same builder (CCI) It appears that Coast picked CCI and that both worked hand in hand. My opinion - Coast also did inspect/perform their fudiciary responsibility
|
|
by John
|
03/10/07 09:09 PM
|
|
CCI is the main culprit, coast just finances the building and CCI just kept selling when they knew they could not keep up with the demand. CCI needs to be held accountable. THANKS!
|
|
by BL
|
03/09/07 05:46 PM
|
|
Battle, Seashore, CCI all need to be found and made accountable for the actions. Everyone was greedy (incl Coast and the individual investors)
Coast seems to have acted irrationally, but CCI and Battle are the true culprits.
FIND HIM!!
|
|
by William Collins
|
03/09/07 10:11 AM
|
|
Why is coast not at fault? Why do some people have slabs with no $$ left to finish the homes? ISnt the bank supposed to inspect the home before the disperse money? They are wrong if they think people wont fight this. People may not have a choice!
|
|
by John
|
03/09/07 09:58 AM
|
|
I'm sure that time will show Battle was funding an extravagent lifestyle in part with loan draws from Coast. Coon and his wife were too happy with their loan commisions, greedy investors didn't watch what they were signing, etc. Plenty of blame.
|
|
by Marty
|
03/08/07 12:09 PM
|
|
Coast is toast. Coon was allowed to run wild, and Coast's board of directors did nothing to stop him. Now it's time to pay the piper.
|
|
by JR
|
03/08/07 09:39 AM
|
|
CCI can't blame Coast for too many deals that CCI couldn't keep up. CCI is the builder selling the homes! If they got overwhelmed, stop accepting new customers.
|
|
by MarySue
|
03/08/07 09:11 AM
|
|
I think it's about time that Coast stood up and made a statement about CCI. Yes, they have their share of blame, but CCI should be implicated, and Jesse Battle should be on the firing line more so than anyone. He's a crook!
|
|