Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Judging the look of Lady Justice
Criticism greets the statue at its unveiling at the courthouse. To be just, some liked it.
By COLLEEN JENKINS
Published March 9, 2007
 |
Artist Audrey Flack, using Robert Marcus to steady her camera, said she did without the customary scales for her "veritas et Justitia" because they're "a little traditional."
|
|
[Times photos: Daniel Wallace]
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
Jose Dominguez and Iris Henriquez discuss the new statue Thursday. "I saw it covered yesterday, and I was curious," Hernriquez said. "It looks good there."
|
 |
|
Audrey Flack was prepared for skepticism of her statue Thursday.
|
 |
|
Huh? Tyrus Gordon checks out the eyes of the "Veritas at Justitia" statue unveiled Thursday in Tampa. Artist Audrey Flack chose to outfit Lady Justice with a blindfold with slits. "It just sorta strikes me as odd," Gordon said.
|
|
TAMPA - The specter emerged from a white sheet outside the George E. Edgecomb Courthouse. Looming before downtown Tampa was a 10-foot-tall, 2,000-pound bronze sculpture, a New York artist's modern interpretation of Lady Justice. With verdigris skin and gilded ringlets spilling from a crown of stars, the work cost Hillsborough County taxpayers $400,000. "Magnificent," decreed County Administrator Pat Bean. Passers-by had other words Thursday. The lady looked like a mermaid, they said. Or a gaudy Gasparilla float. A fairy with dreadlocks. A comic book character. Something out of SpongeBob SquarePants. "At first glance she looks a little bit like an exotic Mesopotamian dancer," said Duane Damon, who works for the Clerk of the Circuit Court. "But when you get closer, it's really not as sensual as that." Strong reaction to public art is nothing new for Tampa, where others have squawked about the so-called exploding chicken and groused over the rusting melted gunmetal sculpture in front of the Sheriff's Office. Last year, then-Commissioner Ronda Storms questioned whether taxpayer money should continue to buy art outside most new government buildings as required by county ordinance since 1989. County leaders and spectators clapped and marveled at the unveiling ceremony, the sculpture's golden highlights sparkling under the late morning sun. But Audrey Flack, an accomplished painter and sculptor with a repertoire of public art pieces, seemed to anticipate skepticism as she explained the inspiration for her work titled "Veritas et Justitia" Truth and Justice. She dismissed a statue holding scales as "a little traditional." "The figure herself is the scales of justice," she said. She didn't originally want a blindfold but compromised by adding one with slits for the statue's eyes. "So she's blind but she can see." As for the green? Copper in bronze eventually turns green in the elements, a la the Statue of Liberty, so Flack decided to go ahead and make the statue "of the earth." Still, many folks who stopped, stared and strained their necks skyward didn't get it. They muttered about the blindfold that looked like a mask, the money that could have gone toward raises or more office space, the likelihood of graffiti and the empty hands that looked like they really, really should be carrying the ubiquitous scales of justice. "Hideous," was all some could muster. "I think she's saying, 'What the (heck) am I doing here? I've got no sword and I've got no scales,' " attorney Theodore Rechel said. "What's with the gold perm?" attorney Matt Mitcham said. "I think it's kind of neat!" offered Al Tirella, an assistant public defender. "I think it's welcoming." Bill Iverson, the county's public art coordinator, seemed unfazed when told about the lukewarm-to-vitriolic response. "Anything new is going to generate reactions, both positive and negative," he said. "We welcome all reactions." Conversation, after all, is an art itself. Colleen Jenkins can be reached at (813) 226-3337 or cjenkins@sptimes.com.
[Last modified March 9, 2007, 06:26:11]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Michelle
|
03/04/08 05:42 PM
|
|
BRAVO !! FOR LAW AND LAWYERS AND JUDGES HAVE NOT ANY TO BE TRULY ACCOUNTABLE TO.
THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF OUR SYSTEM , NOW.
BECAUSE OF HOW THINGS "LOOKED" AND LADY J.-NOT BLIND! .. I STILL FIGHT FOR MY CHILDREN AFTER 5 YEARS.. IRONIC , BUT TRUE .
|
|
by Lisa
|
03/13/07 01:08 AM
|
|
Want your taxes back lets break the statue, and sell the pieces on ebay. I'am sure there is some dingbat out there that will pay big bucks for them.
|
|
by Lowell
|
03/13/07 01:03 AM
|
|
Maybe the statue has it eyes covered because the government thinks were blind to their evil plans.
|
|
by Craig
|
03/13/07 12:59 AM
|
|
This statue looks like it is only worth $400.00.
|
|
by Alicia
|
03/12/07 10:52 PM
|
|
After reading this I want to run for office this is ridiculas. We need to elect people who are not greedy. Besides this statue is a statue nothing more. It is dumb, and ugly.
|
|
by Alicia
|
03/12/07 10:49 PM
|
|
If they can spend 400k on a statue, than I do not want to hear complaints the government has no money to help people in need. We could have used this to purchase land outside of the city for tent city since people are snobbish.
|
|
by John
|
03/12/07 01:43 AM
|
|
Scumbag County Commissioners! $400k!
FIRE THEM ALL.
|
|
by Scott
|
03/10/07 10:43 PM
|
|
Justice went out and got a boob job.
|
|
by Betty
|
03/10/07 09:43 AM
|
|
What's next, changing the American flag because it is "too traditional!" Taking "in God we Trust" off of coins because it is "too traditional" and no longer having a democratic government because it is "too traditional." A lame excuse for wasting $
|
|
by Velvet
|
03/09/07 08:45 PM
|
|
The 'artist' totally missed the entire point. When presenting an iconic symbol, "traditional" is necessity, NOT something to sneer at as beneath you. & as for the blindfold having slits: absurd! The point is she can see WITHOUT eyes. Utterly idiotic.
|
|
by rex
|
03/09/07 08:05 PM
|
|
$400,000!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
by Leonard
|
03/09/07 07:09 PM
|
|
It's not ugly, just a bit garish & out of place. The artist was going for classical & got art nuveau instead. It's doesn't fit infront of a modern building. It might look better in front of the old court house. Or may the lobby of a Vegas casino.
|
|
by Tim
|
03/09/07 04:26 PM
|
|
I still say she's sporting a package!
|
|
by Shirl
|
03/09/07 02:46 PM
|
|
A justice statue without scales and not blind, how ironic (or not) in front of a courthouse name after an African American.
|
|
by David
|
03/09/07 02:30 PM
|
|
Taxpayers pay for art (that some would argue isn't for everyone or a waste) for the same reasons we pay for stadiums, schools and everything else that plenty of other people won't ever use or think is a waste.
Don't like it? Do something about it.
|
|
by chuck
|
03/09/07 02:09 PM
|
|
Justice is stacked!!
|
|
by John
|
03/09/07 01:09 PM
|
|
Interesting - Justice is a blonde.
|
|
by Carl
|
03/09/07 01:06 PM
|
|
Justice is blind? Looks like taxpayers are blind to me !!
|
|
by Ron
|
03/09/07 12:33 PM
|
|
Who cares what it looks like. It's another $400,000 of taxpayers money down the drain. Taxes continue to skyrocket and this kind of waste is just one of the many reasons. Math 101: Government spending = waste of your hard earned money.
|
|
by Peter
|
03/09/07 12:17 PM
|
|
Anyone notice that while justice is "fair and balanced" this Lady Justice seems to be tipping towards the RIGHT... hmmm...
|
|
by Paul
|
03/09/07 12:13 PM
|
|
It's a nice work of art ... but who decided to spend $400,000 of taxpayers dollars on this ? Surely that money could have been used for something "NEEDED" Typical government at work again.
|
|
by Steve
|
03/09/07 12:07 PM
|
|
Hideous. Ghastly. Horribly deformed. Take your pick. How about four HUNDRED dollars?! What a waste...
|
|
by John
|
03/09/07 11:36 AM
|
|
I want my taxes back, looks like a justice league villian.
|
|
by TOM
|
03/09/07 11:16 AM
|
|
Can the street people sleep under it ?
$400,000 would have provided a handsome shelter.
|
|
by Brant
|
03/09/07 11:13 AM
|
|
A mermaid?
|
|
by Robert
|
03/09/07 11:10 AM
|
|
No sword, no scales, no broken chains...
no Justice.
|
|
by Suzie
|
03/09/07 10:55 AM
|
|
I've seen an exhibit of Audrey Flack's art. I'm grateful that Tampa has one of her works. It will be a draw for anyone who likes modern art.
|
|
by Greg
|
03/09/07 10:16 AM
|
|
I don't mind the statue, but why the heck are taxpayers paying for it?!?!
|
|