Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
State questions plans for N. Florida resort
By CRAIG PITTMAN
Published March 10, 2007
The massive hotel and condominium resort a St. Petersburg surgeon wants to build in rural Taylor County suffered a major setback this week, drawing severe criticism from the state's growth planning agency. The Magnolia Bay Resort has generated controversy because it calls for blasting a 2-mile-long channel through the Big Bend Seagrass Aquatic Preserve, the state's largest aquatic preserve and one of the largest stretches of uninterrupted sea grass in North America. Now, the state Department of Community Affairs has told Taylor County officials that their land-use agreement with Dr. J. Crayton Pruitt violates the law, shuts out public participation and blocks state oversight. If the county sticks to its guns, the agency warned it will sue "to prevent the violation or circumvention of state law." Advocates of strong growth management hailed the three-page warning shot as a signal of how Gov. Charlie Crist's administration plans to deal with environmental and growth issues. "In the past, the benefit of the doubt would go to the local government," said Charles Pattison of the group 1,000 Friends of Florida, which favors tight regulation of growth. "Now DCA is looking at what's in the public interest, from the standpoint of what the law says." Tom Pelham, the veteran planner Crist tapped to head up the agency, "is very consistent in trying to enforce the letter of the law," Pattison said. "He has said he's going to be looking at things in particular for their environmental and natural resources impact." That means a project like Magnolia Bay "is definitely going to get their special scrutiny," Pattison said. Pruitt's developer on the resort, Chuck Olson of Treasure Island, has sent a letter to the state that says, "I respectfully disagree with the position expressed in your letter." He promised to review it with his attorneys and respond in greater detail. Taylor County's top building official, Danny Griner, said the county has not decided how to reply to the state's letter, which was signed by Charles Gauthier, director of the Division of Community Planning. Pruitt and Olson want to build enough condominiums to add 7,000 residents to Taylor County, along with a hotel, a helicopter landing pad, a public aquarium, a marine science laboratory and 280,000 square feet of commercial space - all on 500 acres of swamp and salt marsh that the local residents call Boggy Bay. The golf course and RV park would come later. "I think it's going to be a neat thing for Taylor County," Pruitt said last year. Currently about 19,000 people occupy the 1,042 square miles of Taylor County. That's roughly 18 people per square mile. By contrast, Pinellas County has more than 3,000 people per square mile. But the development won't work without the channel - 2 miles long, 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide - to provide boaters with access to the Gulf of Mexico through the shallow, nearshore water, Pruitt said. He has expressed confidence that all the sea grass along the channel's route could be transplanted. Living in the Big Bend sea grass beds is Florida's last big, stable population of bay scallops. The scallops are so plentiful off Dekle Beach that every summer boaters from across the South swarm down to harvest them. Building a marina with 374 wet slips, dry storage for 499 more boats and a public ramp that can handle up to 300 vessels a day would make access to the Gulf of Mexico far easier for the public as well as Magnolia Bay's customers, Pruitt has said. A new Web site set up to promote the project says it's "Sharing Taylor County's Coastal Coastline." But marine biologists say the channel and the development would destroy the scallops' habitat, disrupt the natural flow of water in the preserve and funnel in polluted stormwater runoff. Although groups ranging from the Florida Wildlife Federation to the Gainesville Offshore Fishing Club oppose Magnolia Bay, the project has been strongly endorsed by Taylor County's Chamber of Commerce and its Development Authority. Under Taylor County's land-use plan, the 130 acres that would house the project is listed as agricultural. But the development agreement between the Taylor County Commission and Magnolia Bay said the county wouldn't change its land-use plan all at once. Instead, it said, "the developer intends to request several small comprehensive plan amendments" of 20 acres or less that together would add up to 130 acres. But that's not what the law requires, Gauthier wrote in the letter he sent Wednesday to Taylor officials. The law requires considering all 130 acres together, since it's all one project, he wrote. The reason: Small plan amendments avoid public hearings and state review, Gauthier noted. "Given the irreplaceable environmental resources in the area of the Magnolia Bay proposal," he wrote, "it is of the utmost importance to have appropriate state and regional oversight and public input into any comprehensive plan amendments. ... It is very clear on the surface that the proposed resort will present extraordinary issues in regard to the protection of natural resources and exposure of life and property to natural hazards." Some critics of the project have questioned the wisdom of building Magnolia Bay in Dekle Beach, where in 1993 a massive tidal surge from the no-name storm killed 10 people and destroyed 57 of the 70 houses. Rick Causey, a local critic who has accused developer Olson of punching him during what had been advertised as a public meeting on Magnolia Bay, said that during the 2005 hurricane season he saw the water rise 4 feet under his stilt house at Dekle Beach. The Magnolia Bay project faces more hurdles. It has yet to get the state and federal permits that it needs to fill wetlands, and it needs permission from the governor and Cabinet to alter state-owned submerged land. So far, no Cabinet hearing date has been set, state officials say. "We're not trying to sneak anything over on anybody," Pruitt said last year. "We're following all the rules."
[Last modified March 10, 2007, 05:58:23]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by eddy
|
01/04/08 07:42 PM
|
|
HE WONS 9000 ACRES IN JEFFERSON COUNTY AND IS TRYING TO WEASEL HIS WAY THERE BUT I BEEN TO CITY HALL AND WATCH ALL HIS MOVES(GOOD BY FLORIDA SORRY TO SEE YOU GO BUT WE ARE ALL TO BLAME FOR SELLING YOUR SOUL...RUSSELLE JAMES 2006)
|
|
by Chris
|
05/17/07 09:07 AM
|
|
There is no infrastructure because there is no tax base. State owns 90% of coastline, how is this destroying " what's left?" He has as much right to build on HIS land as you have to live in your trailer in the pine trees. Stop crying.
|
|
by Chris
|
03/28/07 02:34 PM
|
|
This project is a joke. 1. Dekle/Keaton Beach only has a two lane road coming into town (how's that going to support 6000 new people?) 2. How can you justify destroying what's left of the "natural" coastline? 3. The county only sees $$$$$$
|
|
by Chris
|
03/28/07 02:33 PM
|
|
Also, check on the "company" that just bought the Keaton Beach Marina. The word on the beach is that it is wholly owned by Mr. Pruitt.....
|
|
by jackie
|
03/22/07 09:40 AM
|
|
WHOA! have we learned NOTHING?! fill in wetlands?! in a state at/barely above sea level? pls visit Punta Gorda,and New Orleans. DO NOT LET THIS PROJECT PROCEED,we need input,oversight&long term plans:the eco-enviro harm will stand longer than bldgs
|
|
by Donnie
|
03/21/07 02:48 PM
|
|
The bacterial count is always high off Dekle and Keaton Beaches. More revenue and development will bring attention to cleaning up the mess. Taylor county needs the tax dollars.
|
|
by john
|
03/17/07 11:06 AM
|
|
Cynthia you need to check your facts before making statements. The Taylor County news paper could also use some training in printing the facts.
|
|
by Paula
|
03/15/07 06:26 PM
|
|
Fill wetlands? For commercial gain? When will we wake up?
|
|
by Bev
|
03/14/07 10:38 AM
|
|
This project must be prevented. The sea grass bed should receive the highest level of protection available from our government. The Chamber of Commerce and the county commissioners have been seduced by the smell of money.
|
|
by shannon
|
03/12/07 05:34 PM
|
|
These beaches are the most polluted beaches in florida. When you call that pristine, I dont get it. Someone needs to do something taylor county is going downhill and the your beaches too!
|
|
by Mickee
|
03/10/07 09:39 PM
|
|
If florida does not stop building it will have nothing to offer except a warm climate with a living enviroment like the Bronx in New York...Wake up Florida Before the Donald Trumps ruin our state. We can stop them as there are are more of us then $$$
|
|
by BJ
|
03/10/07 09:31 PM
|
|
It's amazing the amount of pressure our local businesses can exert on the decisions made by County officials. Destroy the environment for dollars now and screw the future for our children.
|
|
by Lyn
|
03/10/07 09:16 PM
|
|
Taylor County has no infrastructure to support a development of this size. Beach area residents have no fire protection, little police presence, and drive their trash to the local dump. Our environment should be protected not exploited.
|
|
by wally
|
03/10/07 08:21 PM
|
|
a winter resident in fl for 5 of the lst 7 years, i firmly believe that this project should NOT BE APPROVED.
|
|
by Steven
|
03/10/07 08:05 PM
|
|
Way to go! These developers(profiteers,land barons) do not care what happens to Florida.They mess up their state,and move to Florida .From their one-light towns,to a sweet state like Florida,and pillage the place .Go Back!
|
|
by Cynthia
|
03/10/07 04:11 PM
|
|
Pittman your story is very slanted, All charges were dropped aginst Chuck Olsen, M. Causey has filed other suits against(2)County Comm again the charges were dropped. M. Causey maybe sued for attorney costs.Pittman tell the truth next time you write
|
|
by Cynthia
|
03/10/07 03:40 PM
|
|
I have watched our children leave, families destroyed because of the lack of jobs. I live here taylor,it is one of the poorest in state. The hopital is ready to close we need tax $ for that help. So pleae, if you don't live here don't pass judgement
|
|
by JT
|
03/10/07 02:59 PM
|
|
Lot of hypocritical thinking being displayed. Residents in a county 200 times as dense telling others not to develop sounds about as dense as the plan being put forth. Do you think seagrass was/is destroyed in Pinellas? Pull the bridge up I made it..
|
|
by Joyce
|
03/10/07 02:00 PM
|
|
Hooray for Gov. Crist and Tom Pelham. At long last we have officials who really get it. Florida now has rational defenders of the true value of ecosystems. A pox on bandit developers and the Chamber of Commerce in Taylor County.
|
|
by Darrin
|
03/10/07 12:49 PM
|
|
A Republican saying no to thoughtless, enviromentally destructive, development. What is the world coming to?
|
|
by Paul
|
03/10/07 12:48 PM
|
|
Another reason my wife and I retired Feb 1st and are now living peacefully in the north GA woods.
|
|
by Jason
|
03/10/07 12:19 PM
|
|
FYI one of Dr.Pruitt's daughters is married to former Speaker of the House Peter Rudy Wallace. This project sounds like a sinkhole waiting to happen.
|
|
by Marty
|
03/10/07 12:19 PM
|
|
Taylor county could use some help, but by all means make sure everything is right before destroying any of our wetlands. If you have never been to Taylor county,nothing there to speak of. The people there need the work.
|
|
by Jason
|
03/10/07 11:28 AM
|
|
Destroy more natural Florida so that more yankees can move down here and crowd up the state? NO THANKS!!! We should have a moratorium on new residents. New York just called. They don't have enough people to run the place. They're all down here!
|
|
by Margaret
|
03/10/07 11:08 AM
|
|
I grew up in this county, spent a lot of time at Dekle Beach and now live in Pinellas county. I say to Pruitt and to Bernard below - jobs and a resort are not a positive when having such a devastating effect of the environment! And YOU ARE sneaky
|
|
by FRED
|
03/10/07 10:37 AM
|
|
So they're not trying to sneak anything over on anybody?So why are they trying to circumvent Florida law by "requesting several SMALL comprehensive plan amendments"? Because they know they can avoid PUBLIC HEARINGS required for the entire 130 acres.
|
|
by Carole
|
03/10/07 09:58 AM
|
|
Thank you, thank you DCA and Gov. Chris. Perhaps now the county will focus its attention on sensible business projects for jobs. Not those that will impact the environment. The Nature Coast needs protection. This is a great start.
|
|
by Lisa
|
03/10/07 09:57 AM
|
|
This is just one more example of money corrupting the land and sea. Why does Pruitt insist "this will be a neat thing" and that they're "not trying to sneak anything over anybody"? Yes, they are and everybody knows it!! Go away Pruitt/Olson!!
|
|
by Fred
|
03/10/07 09:39 AM
|
|
As described in the article, "500 acres of swamp and salt marsh that the local residents call Boggy Bay", "wetlands", "submerged land", sounds like the wrong place to be in a hurricane.
|
|
by Jon
|
03/10/07 09:17 AM
|
|
Where is former Speaker of the House Peter "Rudy" Wallace when we need him? This a bad deal for the State and Taylor Co. . We do not need any more condominiums. Florida needs more open space to be preserved! Not 7000 condominiums.No! No! No!
|
|
by Bernard
|
03/10/07 09:11 AM
|
|
Way to blast your way to a one sided article. Please don't mention employment, tax base or any other positives for a small county. Where is proof that a (hugh) 100 ft wide channel would ruin the enviroment for this county.
|
|
by brian
|
03/10/07 07:36 AM
|
|
Thank god jeb is out!If bush was still in office, this thing would be a slam dunk!
|
|