Video report
- For their own good
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
- More video reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Column
Ow! Quit twistin' our arms, already!
By HOWARD TROXLER
Published March 13, 2007
If the people of Pinellas County do not vote today to renew the "Penny for Pinellas" sales tax, the county will sink into the Gulf of Mexico. If the Penny tax is not renewed, plague will erupt. Brimstone will fall from the sky. Social order will collapse. Pauly Shore will release another movie. Old men will no longer reminisce. Children will no longer laugh. The parks will wither. The police will loot. The Nile will turn red. (No, wait. That was someplace else.) This is the stuff coming from the local governments of Pinellas County, which have campaigned desperately (with tax dollars) to get the tax renewed through 2020. And it is no wonder they are worried. The Penny for Pinellas, sold to voters in 1989 as a way to buy Extra Things, has morphed 17 years later into a capital piggy bank. So make no mistake - if the Penny is not renewed today, almost $2-billion will disappear with a poof, along with plans for roads and bridges, parks and police stations, libraries and rec centers. To which I ask, mustering as innocent a tone as possible: Is that bad? * * * The first reason to vote to renew the Penny is the list of Good Stuff it will buy. The second reason to renew the Penny is that sales taxes also are paid by visitors. The third reason is that the money is raised and spent locally. There is no Washington or Tallahassee bureaucracy taking its cut. The fourth reason is that we have to build at least some of this stuff no matter what, and have to pay for it. This is direct local democracy at its finest. The question is simple: Do we want to tax ourselves to benefit ourselves? * * * The first reason to vote against renewing the Penny for Pinellas is that government spending has ballooned. Government will always spend as much as it has. The second reason to vote no is that the Penny has changed from a focused tax for specific extras to a taken-for-granted pork-pot. The third reason is that accounting of Penny funds has grown faster and looser. The fourth is that the sales tax, although paid in part by nonresidents, is regressive, hardest on the poorest. The fifth reason, advanced by the bishop of the Catholic Diocese of St. Petersburg, is that the Penny emphasizes "brick and mortar" projects over human needs. The sixth is that the county and cities have rammed the tax down the voters' throats, with signs (they even tried to put them on polling places), and tax-funded campaigns, and threats. The election is being held in March, in hopes of a lower anti-tax turnout. The seventh is that the county will do as it pleases anyway, as evidenced by its delay of decisions about the Brooker Creek Preserve until after the election. I have listed seven "no" reasons and only four "yes" ones, but that doesn't matter. Maybe you will decide the "yes" reasons far outweigh the "no." If so, that's great. The point is neither to swallow the government's propaganda, nor to cast a knee-jerk, anti-tax vote without admitting the serious consequences. Howard Troxler now has a blog for updates, observations and reader comments. Check it out at www.tampbay.com by clicking on the "Blogs" link, or at the Web address blogs.tampabay.com/troxler.
[Last modified March 13, 2007, 01:36:34]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Jay
|
03/14/07 01:01 AM
|
|
It's simple why Pinellas citizens voted to tax themselves 10 more years - the ignorant masses (80%) stayed home while government/union leaders instructed their workers, school teachers, etc to vote YES to guarantee them increased pay/benefits.
|
|
by Jon
|
03/13/07 08:51 PM
|
|
You hit it on the button. Vote no because government will spend all it has.
|
|
by John
|
03/13/07 04:48 PM
|
|
The "Penny for Pinellas" phrase is really a misnomer. It's a 1% sales surtax. Stop trying to "fool" the public.
|
|
by tom
|
03/13/07 04:46 PM
|
|
The county does not need more money. It's budget has almost doubled in 5 years with money from the property tax windfall.
|
|
by Fred
|
03/13/07 04:26 PM
|
|
I just came from the polls. They said attendance was very light. I was amazed that the only item on my ballet was the penny tax.
I wonder how much the one item vote cost the taxpayers.
|
|
by John C
|
03/13/07 03:21 PM
|
|
I moved out of Pinellas last year to live in north central Florida, but I hope the citizens of Pinellas see this for what it really is. Government will always self perpetuate and will always whine about needing more. You've got to draw a line.
|
|
by Ann
|
03/13/07 03:08 PM
|
|
When the State Attorney's Office and the St. Pete Times investigates the $$$ squandered by the City of St. Pete parks department or if Hell freezes over, I'll vote for the penny. Mining sand at Lake Magiorri to send to private Gate Way developer?
|
|
by JOSEPH
|
03/13/07 02:38 PM
|
|
I SAY MAYBE A 25 PERCENT RULE .A QUARTER TO ALL GOVERMENT COSTS AND WAGES . A QUARTER TO FUND ROADS , PROJECTS, AND SCHOOLS, ETC. 25 PERCENT MATERIAL, GOOD LAND PURCHACE, ETC, FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING,INCLUDING SENIORS, AND VETS. 25PER 4 THEIR WAGE EDU
|
|
by John
|
03/13/07 12:49 PM
|
|
There is no accoutability in the Penny for Pinellas program - it is pork pure and simple. Yes, we need to build the fire house - no issue there, but we don't need a government funded $100K sculpture out in front. THAT's what's wrong with the penny.
|
|
by Barbara
|
03/13/07 12:35 PM
|
|
Vote YES! This is a prime example of the Rubio tax reform proposal, but the best part of this is that WE CONTROL IT LOCALLY. If you're not happy with where the money is spent, call your rep and complain about it!
|
|
by Spud
|
03/13/07 12:14 PM
|
|
I voted against the one percent for pinellas because I am tired of the tax and spend republicans in this county. They can start to learn to live within their means.
|
|
by Paul
|
03/13/07 11:58 AM
|
|
The sales tax in New Jersey is 6%. The property tax is lower than Pinellas county. We do have better schools and roads and its the most densely populated state. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that our state elected Democrates to office.
|
|
by John
|
03/13/07 11:49 AM
|
|
Public libraries will suffer greatly if you get rid of this tax. Public libraries is the one place that can help educate people from all classes and help us become a more educated society. Vote "YES"
|
|
by e
|
03/13/07 11:35 AM
|
|
death to voluntary taxation.
|
|
by No Cheap Guy
|
03/13/07 10:42 AM
|
|
It's a penny who cares!
|
|
by JT
|
03/13/07 10:41 AM
|
|
Pease tell the City/County Commissions what programs to cut so they can reduce spending and taxes!!! I say scrape the Suncoast Transit Authority and take that $167 off my bill. Privatize the bus system and let those using it pay their fair share!!!
|
|
by Tony
|
03/13/07 10:31 AM
|
|
JT, how do you plan to encourage Govt to spend less? The best way to get Govt to spend less is give them less to spend. We pay 16% more sales taxes than the counties around us. Jim if is better up north, TIA has flights every hour, so jump on one.
|
|
by Jim
|
03/13/07 09:42 AM
|
|
Why admonish this? Why do you think the North has better schools, infrastructure, and police enforcement? Because the people pay the tax, that's why. These improvements have to come from somewhere; would you rather they raise property taxes?
|
|
by Charlie
|
03/13/07 09:27 AM
|
|
The tax should be renamed "PORK for Pinellas" enough already. Don't forget a few months ago they increased the gas tax a Penny per gallon.
|
|
by PorkCounty
|
03/13/07 09:23 AM
|
|
Do you ever think the county will listen to the people? Bob Stewart, Steve Spratt and the gang of tax warriors are on a mission to keep the taxes going. Property tax, Penny for Pork tax and many more. How about help for the People. Vote them OUT!!!
|
|
by Bill
|
03/13/07 09:21 AM
|
|
Penny my aspercream! Try many pennies. To buy a new car the first 5000 is taxed at 7% =350.00 That is money I could use to pay taxes, insurance, but no I must give it to the Pinellas County PORK Barrel!
|
|
by Elwood
|
03/13/07 09:20 AM
|
|
As a former municipal employee I can tell you that millions in "penny" dollars have gone to help private development in downtown St. Petersburg (i.e. Sembler, Bullard, Opus & others) yet I still don't have reclaimed water in my neighborhood. Vote NO!
|
|
by Chuck
|
03/13/07 09:09 AM
|
|
What has the county done will the massive amount of money they have made on property taxes over the past few years? I live on a budget, so should our local government.
|
|
by paul
|
03/13/07 08:40 AM
|
|
howie, you forgot that w/a lower sales tax it would draw not only more tourists but neighboring counties (pasco, hill's)to local business's. and while they drive here they can use the pretty new roads the former penny paid for.
|
|
by Reggie
|
03/13/07 08:38 AM
|
|
I voted yes for Pinellas because I plan on living here for many more years. I was born here 55 years ago long before Tampa Bay was so developed as it is now. In balance the penny has been for needs and we get the tourist to pay a third. Vote Yes!
|
|
by Paul
|
03/13/07 07:56 AM
|
|
*cough *cough, wasn't this a temporary tax.... kinda like social security was supposed to be temporary. Guess the government's definition of temporary is a hundred years. phooey! Vote no, and move on. The sun will still rise, I guarantee you.
|
|
by Susan
|
03/13/07 07:38 AM
|
|
I was around for the First Penny... and supported it. As I remember the proposed projects were not completed, some not implemented. Then came Penny #2, same old, same old. Now Penny #3... my vote today will be NO.
|
|
by Lucia
|
03/13/07 07:38 AM
|
|
We're voting now so they can have other chances to bring it back to voters in case it gets defeated now. No one in county government is stupid.
|
|
by Alexis
|
03/13/07 07:36 AM
|
|
Having recently resigned from a Pinellas municipality after 12 years of service I can attest to the outrageous use of these dollars and would encourage a vote of no. I have seen plenty of waste and could stomach no more.
|
|
by JT
|
03/13/07 07:27 AM
|
|
Gee Troxler you appear Fair & Balanced today. Good run down on the issue. VOTE YES for PENNY and don't take away visitors and non-property tax payers opportunity to contribute. A no vote will mean higher property taxes. Encourage Govt to cut spending
|
|
by Sandy
|
03/13/07 07:27 AM
|
|
What happened to the promise of Fred Marquis the 1st time the county asked for the Penny for Pinellas tax. He promised it was a one-time tax and this time the county would definitely come back and ask for an extension? Lasted 7 years.
|
|
by Arnold
|
03/13/07 06:59 AM
|
|
Howard, for the most part, I think you are getting it! $126 Million sitting in a contingency reserve. 21% of the operating budget. How prudent? We need the spending caps, the property tax referendum, and vote out some clowns. Get control back.
|
|
by Chris
|
03/13/07 05:27 AM
|
|
This is a brick and mortar fund. It has nothing to do with government 'ballooning'. Your short sightedness is dangerous to the future and well being of our infrastructure in Pinellas. In case you haven't heard, State and Fed. funds can't keep up.
|
|
by Eric
|
03/13/07 04:53 AM
|
|
I realize the Penny for Pinellas tax has its merits and its flaws. Do we have to vote for it three years before it is slated to take effect? I smell a "rat." Do you? If so, vote "NO" at this time. We need more dialogue as to where the money will go
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|