Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Penny tax shines at ballot box
Voters once again extend the tax for a decade, despite recent opposition.
By WILL VAN SANT
Published March 14, 2007
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Times photo: Dirk Shadd]
Volunteers hold up campaign signs Tuesday standing outside the Gulfport Recreation Center.
|
|
Despite organized opposition and a seemingly antitax climate, voters Tuesday extended the Penny for Pinellas another decade. In a strikingly low turnout, 57 percent of voters approved the 1-cent per dollar sales tax. Now county government and Pinellas' 24 cities will enjoy an estimated $2-billion in revenue from 2010, when the tax was to expire, through 2020. Governments will use the money to pay for an array of public infrastructure projects, such as spending $225-million for additional jail beds and courtrooms. Passage of the Penny, in a voter turnout of only 16 percent, came as relief to elected leaders who had seen their darling assaulted by critics from several quarters in the week before Tuesday's vote. "The Penny is vital," County Commissioner Ken Welch said shortly after results were known. "I'm glad that the people of Pinellas County reconfirmed its value even in the midst of some misdirected action in response to the property tax issue." In the days leading up to the vote, it certainly seemed the Penny's passage was in greater peril. Gov. Charlie Crist, a Pinellas voter, came out against the Penny, saying local governments are wallowing in cash. Opposition came also from residents galvanized by the property tax revolt of last September, which led some local governments to trim their property tax rates. One flowering of this movement is the group Cut Taxes Now, which staged a rally Friday against the Penny on the steps of the County Courthouse. But it was the last minute attempt to influence the vote by Bishop Robert N. Lynch of the Roman Catholic Diocese of St. Petersburg that many found most surprising. Despite state law requiring that Penny revenue be spent on public infrastructure such as jails, roads, bridges and parks, Lynch faulted the county's plan for spending little to aid the disadvantaged. The bishop's message was delivered in letters to his priests, inside a Catholic newsletter and in a full page ad in Sunday's St. Petersburg Times. Although no explicit directive to vote no was delivered, Lynch did take aim at the Penny from the pulpit, telling parishioners Sunday that $30-million in the spending plan slated for affordable housing was "a pittance." Frank Murphy, head of Catholic Charities, was involved in the talks that led the church to come out against the Penny. Murphy said he was not disappointed, but would have wanted Tuesday's result to be a little closer. "Voters have expressed themselves," Murphy said. "We still intend to go back to the county and ask for more money for social services." In the end, the anti-Penny onslaught, while it certainly had elected leaders nervous, was not enough to shake the faith voters have in the tax, which has been in effect since 1990. "If they do everything they say they are going to do with the Penny, it'll be a good thing," said 81-year-old Gloria Brown, a St. Petersburg voter and resident since 1949 who enjoys city parks that have benefitted from Penny funding. County leaders scheduled Tuesday's vote back in 2005. In the run up, the decision was criticized by some, including Lynch, who said the vote was deliberately staged during an off-year municipal election cycle, which historically have low turnout. In such elections, the thinking goes, only highly motivated voters - such as diehard Penny backers - will bother going to the polls, increasing the likelihood of the tax being approved. Despite strident efforts by Penny enthusiasts and tax detractors to get their fellow believers to the polls, Tuesday's turnout was far poorer than even past experience would have suggested. When the Penny was first adopted, narrowly, in 1989, voter turnout was 29 percent. Voters extended the tax again by a landslide in 1997 and turnout was 23 percent. Staff Writer Aaron Sharockman contributed to this report. Will Van Sant can be reached at vansant@sptimes.com or 727-445-4166.
[Last modified March 14, 2007, 00:44:37]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by John
|
03/14/07 10:44 PM
|
|
I hope the Times support the 2.5% tax plan circulating in Tallahassee as much as they have supporting this regressive tax.
|
|
by John
|
03/14/07 10:39 PM
|
|
6% current sales tax 1% penny tax 2.5% Rubio's plan = 9.5%
I could live with that to eliminate property taxes and solve this crisis once & for all.
|
|
by JB
|
03/14/07 10:16 PM
|
|
The Largo city manager makes $140k! No wonder we need additional taxes!
|
|
by Drew Finn
|
03/14/07 08:48 PM
|
|
Oh yes, party at the "Dept of Graft & Corruption" tonight !! Tons of money to waste until 2020 !!! Let's extend the Pinellas Trail to Orlando and put up some more statues like Dunedin. Spare no expense, the taxpayers are buying !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
by Tom
|
03/14/07 07:40 PM
|
|
1st Threat is always services will be cut. What needs to happen for tru tax reduction is process/productivity improvement that leads to less Govt employees and less benefits costs. Somethings wrong when Govt empl benefits are above the avg joe's.
|
|
by james
|
03/14/07 07:30 PM
|
|
I can't believe they allow voting in churches. Where's the separation of church and state? I'll never vote in any religious business locale. Oh and clogging up a fire station with vehicles filled with white heads is another notion that blows me away!
|
|
by John
|
03/14/07 04:27 PM
|
|
Next time you're in Baywalk or at SweetBay in St. Pete remember these for profit privately owned commercial properties are just a few of the ones in Pinellas built with "pennies" too. "S" and Jamie should be tied up in a bag and dropped in the bay.
|
|
by wendy
|
03/14/07 02:34 PM
|
|
Well, apathy rules!!! They could probably get away with raising property taxes up,why? because people would rather pay then vote..How Sad!!! The Commission which spends like "drunken sailors" wins again.
|
|
by SadCatholic
|
03/14/07 01:46 PM
|
|
The Bishop might consider staying out of secular politics! The government might refrain from using tax money to ask for tax money!
|
|
by Jamie
|
03/14/07 01:27 PM
|
|
I guess only the conspiracy theorist acutally post comments. Everyone else just votes...:) the next time you are enjoying the weather in one of our nice parks remember that is was paid for by the penny. Now quit belly aching and get back to work...:)
|
|
by Louise
|
03/14/07 12:33 PM
|
|
Without the tax $$, these projects will still get done. The difference is our property taxes would increase even more. This way, snowbirds and tourists get to help too.
|
|
by Jerry
|
03/14/07 11:54 AM
|
|
It's not Pennies for Pinellas, it's Billions for Pinellas. Or at least for the politicians to play with. Only those who profit from the tax voted. Teachers, and others on the public dole. The apathetic, the majority of the great unwashed stayed home.
|
|
by S
|
03/14/07 11:49 AM
|
|
It has been voted on and decided. If you do not like it then move away!
|
|
by Mr. Burns
|
03/14/07 11:43 AM
|
|
Excellant! Now if we can just eliminate that silly proposal in Tallahassee that they do away with property tax we'll have truly stuck it to the common citizen. My plan to tax and spend is alive and well.
|
|
by John
|
03/14/07 11:09 AM
|
|
I congratulate Bishop Lynch for his courage in asking soulless government machines to spend on the poor, but let's see my Church spend less on infrastructure, salaries, benefits - and more on the needy. But the Bishop was right - I voted "no."
|
|
by Judy
|
03/14/07 10:54 AM
|
|
I can't believe the stupidity of the voters who voted for it!! The county doesn't know how to properly manage the money they have.
|
|
by Scott
|
03/14/07 10:45 AM
|
|
The distribution of Penny for Pinellas funds is based on a population formula. Since by default the County is the local government for the Unincorporated Population they get our portion of funds but use most of our revenues for Countywide Projects.
|
|
by JohnGalt
|
03/14/07 10:30 AM
|
|
Once again, brainwashed zombies vote for Big Brother to take their money, as government TV ads spin them into believing EVERYTHING is funded by the Penny Tax. These gullible voters should be ashamed. Our Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves.
|
|
by Erik
|
03/14/07 10:16 AM
|
|
The Bishop is a retard, money to the homeless alcoholic bums????
|
|
by Johnna
|
03/14/07 09:54 AM
|
|
I can understand the low turn out, last I was notified my polling place had changed. I could not even find my new voting location! Don't like the blackmail, "property tax will go up if this isn't approved" ~ government or mafia?!?
|
|
by pj
|
03/14/07 09:18 AM
|
|
need the penny because when we vote to get rid of the property tax...then you will see services suffer....
|
|
by Jason
|
03/14/07 09:18 AM
|
|
At least now the County Commissioners can take more trips to Hawaii like they did in past years past. This passed because of the onslaught of voters from the Northeast states that love taxes. They think it's great!
|
|
by Tom
|
03/14/07 09:01 AM
|
|
Will, did you notice early voting was more protax and support did drop after only a few days of opposition. You guys got what you wanted, shifting the tax burden from the rich; but sacraficed a lot of credibility with your biased coverage.
|
|
by Pete
|
03/14/07 08:47 AM
|
|
Has anyone every thought that the only way it passed was because all the highly motivated voters =(county and city leaders) vote yes! The rest of the voters said NO! Was it fair? NO Maybe they should ask again next year! Pinellas Pennies Pork Barrel
|
|
by Jim
|
03/14/07 08:39 AM
|
|
I think it's time for the County Commission to show some fiscal leadership and lower the property tax equal to the amount they will collect from the penny for Pinellas. They also need to re-define what essential services really are.
|
|
by Pete
|
03/14/07 08:38 AM
|
|
I did the math, only 6% of pinellas county citizens voted in favor of "the penny". Only 10% of the county voted (based on 2005 pop. est.) These figures are shameful. Everyone who voted, Thanks. Those who did not, Shame on You!
|
|
by Reggie
|
03/14/07 08:21 AM
|
|
The reason why I voted to extend the penny is because I do plan on living in Pinellas. Also because the penny has mostly been well spent in the past and the penny extension will help to keep our quality of life from eroding. Yes for Pinellas!
|
|
by David
|
03/14/07 08:19 AM
|
|
Congratulations Pinellas county, you've been snowballed again! The next bill that passes will increase our sales tax to 15% with the FALSE promise of lower property taxes. If anyone thinks the local government will lower taxes they're mistaken!
|
|
by George
|
03/14/07 08:17 AM
|
|
"Voter turnout of only 16%." The only people to blame are the people of Pinellas County. Voter apathy passed this tax again. Quit your whining and go vote next time!
|
|
by JB
|
03/14/07 08:10 AM
|
|
This is why democracy doesn't work. Give the power to decide to people who are uneducated and this is what happens.
|
|
by Bland
|
03/14/07 08:05 AM
|
|
A thought. Why not start a petition for a referendum vote to cancel the tax in the 2008 general election or when the 2.5% property tax referendum is voted on this year? Tax does not start until 2010 we can still stop it! Eliminate low turnout!
|
|
by chuck
|
03/14/07 07:58 AM
|
|
Gas tax, extra penny on sales tax tax, increasing property tax, phone tax, income tax, water and sewage tax. Im sure Im leaving out a lot. When is it enough? Keep giving the government money and they will spend it.
|
|
by Helen
|
03/14/07 07:53 AM
|
|
There was no valid reason to have this issue on a ballot in 2007.
I hope that all of the people who voted for this stupid tax intend to stay in Pinellas County until 2020 to pay for it. It would be unfair for them to move out of town now.
|
|
by Bill
|
03/14/07 07:48 AM
|
|
Well looks like the Pinellas County Pork Barrels will be over flowing with our pennies! More waste on their part. It's like a blank check! Why can't we make sure they spend it wisely? Make them show accountability for every penny
|
|
by Fred
|
03/14/07 07:42 AM
|
|
Like everything else the county does, they probably rigged the vote to get the tax back.
|
|