Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Property tax cut rolls on
By ALEX LEARY
Published March 17, 2007
TALLAHASSEE - Rejecting opposition from local governments, House Republicans on Friday voted to slash billions in property tax revenue from city and county budgets. The proposal, which is only the first step toward making the cuts a reality, calls for rolling back property taxes to 2001 levels, with adjustments for inflation plus population growth, and a cap on future revenue collection. Doing so would shave an estimated 18 percent off the average property tax bill. But it would also strip $5.5-billion from local coffers and limit future spending. Friday's vote by the House Policy and Budget Committee comes as the Legislature and governor try to find a solution to the property tax problem. The Senate has yet to fully develop its proposals. "It didn't have to be this way," said Rep. Ellyn Bogdanoff, R-Fort Lauderdale. "Local government could have recognized the windfall revenues generated by the real estate boom and it could have been returned to taxpayers long ago. However, they have chosen not to act and so we must." Reacting to complaints, Republicans voted to leave three groups out of the property tax rollback: 30 rural counties with narrow tax bases, tax-supported public hospitals, and child services councils, including one in Pinellas County. But those exemptions represent only a fraction, about $300-million, of the overall cuts facing local government. The rollback is one of two plans House Republicans want to accomplish. Their top goal is a constitutional amendment to replace property taxes on homesteads with a 2.5-cents-on-the-dollar increase in the sales tax. That plan also would incorporate the rollback but it would begin at 2003 levels, saving local governments millions. And the sales tax revenue also would go back to cities and counties. "If I were a city or county, that constitutional thing may be looking real tasty," said Rep. David Rivera, R-Miami. Not much looked good Friday to local government officials and their lobbyists. "It's going to be ugly," said Clearwater Mayor Frank Hibbard, who was not at the meeting but testified before the House last week. Clearwater officials estimate up to a $20-million loss. "We're going to have to look at closures of libraries, rec centers. We'll even have to review our community policing program," Hibbard said. Unlike last week, when there was a virtual train of opposition, Republicans got some testimony on their behalf. "Rather than take a good, hard look at their spending, counties and cities across Florida are spending my hard-earned tax dollars on lobbyists and lawyers and redundant studies," said Jill Dorson Chi, a business owner in Nassau County. "They are using scare tactics and threatening cuts in police and libraries and vital services rather than cutting fat." The 24-7 vote sent the bill to the full House. Three Democrats joined Republicans in support of the legislation (HB 7001). Democrats tried to add amendments that would have carved out exemptions for police and fire budgets and programs mandated by the state. Their intent was to paint Republicans as insensitive to homeland security and other basic needs. "We need to send a message here from Tallahassee that we care about law enforcement," said Rep. Jack Seiler, D-Wilton Manors. Republicans killed each of the amendments.
[Last modified March 17, 2007, 02:31:27]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by mike
|
04/24/07 01:55 PM
|
|
i agree with removing property taxes, but there has to be an amendment to protect fire and police.
|
|
by Guy
|
03/25/07 12:12 AM
|
|
Remove homestead property taxes entirely! They hurt everyone from retirees to first time home buyers. Counties reap a huge and unfair increase in taxes each time an older home is sold and revalued, and they deliver no extra services to the property.
|
|
by John
|
03/19/07 05:07 PM
|
|
Ken, FL has one of the highest property tax rates in the country. Overall, taxes may be low, but our salaries are low too, so everything evens out.
So lets get rid of the property tax & add 2.5% sales tax.
|
|
by Ken
|
03/19/07 11:40 AM
|
|
Take a look at any non-partisan analysis of the tax rates of the 50 states - FL's rate is higher than only 6! And still people want gov't to do more - but tax even less. If you think FL taxes are too high - move to Connecticut! Or DC, or.......
|
|
by JR
|
03/19/07 10:07 AM
|
|
I agree local gov should have cut millage rates as the property values skyrocketed faster than the budget needed. Taking the excess income and finding ways to spend it was bad fiscal management.
|
|
by tom
|
03/18/07 08:10 PM
|
|
pay the same tax for your property with
save ours homes appreciation and when it is sold pay the appreciation tax. at least owners will have the money at that time instead of forcing from their homes after being raised here! charge developers more
|
|
by tom
|
03/18/07 07:44 PM
|
|
your property is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
if your NOT considering selling your home, why should you be paying what some dope says that it is worth. unless the county wants to guarantee that you can.pay appreciation tax after
|
|
by John
|
03/18/07 02:49 PM
|
|
Property taxes have nearly doubled in the last five years. Where is all this tax money going? Local government spending is ludicrous & out of control.
It's time for drastic substantial cuts dictated by the Florida Legislature & the citizens of FL.
|
|
by Jim Parker
|
03/18/07 06:28 AM
|
|
politicians only like tax cuts when it's their baby--and they can claim credit. We need a single/simple tax plan and the sales tax looks less painful than the other alternatives.
|
|
by Drew Finn
|
03/18/07 12:33 AM
|
|
No problem for Pinellas - they will just find a way to collect more pennies!!! No stopping our "Dept of Graft & Corruption" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
by Ann
|
03/17/07 04:14 PM
|
|
Whatever tax relief method is chosen, it should be substantial and quick before everyone is taxed out of there homes.
|
|
by Jack
|
03/17/07 04:12 PM
|
|
Elimination of property taxes for 2.5% state sales tax is pretty much good for everybody. Everyone should be paying for services including renters & homeowners. This way illegals & criminals will also help pay.
|
|
by sara
|
03/17/07 04:12 PM
|
|
Now I think all those officals that want to close down services need to roll back their raises to the same level as the taxes.
|
|
by Tony
|
03/17/07 03:06 PM
|
|
Does Joe really think he has any say in how his local goverment spends his money? Always the doom and gloom, cut police, fire, parks and help for the eldery. What did they do before the property values sky rocketed? We had police, fire, ect. then.
|
|
by Jim
|
03/17/07 02:23 PM
|
|
Only the Rubio proposal addresses homestead property value differences, transportability of home basis, caps commercial and 2nd home tax growth, while placing realistic spending restrictions to local government. No other proposal so far has done all
|
|
by JT
|
03/17/07 09:15 AM
|
|
Mayor Hibbard should stay in Clearwater and run government more cost effectively instead of lobbying to control more of your family's money. Of course he does have those boat slips to build now so I suppose we should all be more understanding...
|
|
by Frank
|
03/17/07 07:04 AM
|
|
John is another of the uninformed easily swayed by a foolish state legislature.
|
|
by Joe
|
03/17/07 07:03 AM
|
|
The unfunded state mandates will continue, therefore, we will cut what the local citizen wants in order to fund what the state mandates. Leave taxing to the locals and not Tallahassee. I want to make my own decisions, I am a voter.
|
|
by John
|
03/17/07 05:48 AM
|
|
It's about time the Florida Legislature did something about this uncontrolled spending by local government. Maybe finally the property tax rates will start dropping before everyone has left the state. I urge everyone to applaud your legislature.
|
|