Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Cover blown, ex-spy speaks
Valerie Plame, now known worldwide, tells what leaking her name cost.
By ANITA KUMAR
Published March 17, 2007
WASHINGTON - The room got quiet, and everyone instinctively leaned forward to hear. For years, other people had spoken for her. But at a congressional hearing Friday morning, Valerie Plame, now a famous American spy, told her story for the first time. Her voice was smooth and even, a tad on the soft side. She talked about how she was an undercover agent, taking issue with pundits and politicians who insisted otherwise. She talked about how she did not select her husband to go on a CIA fact-finding trip to investigate Iraq's alleged nuclear weapons program. She talked about how officials in the Bush administration "carelessly and recklessly" leaked her name for political reasons. "We in the CIA always know that we might be exposed and threatened by foreign enemies," she said. "It was a terrible irony that administration officials were the ones who destroyed my cover." Bush administration officials are accused of revealing Plame's name to the news media as retaliation against her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson IV, who in a July 2003 column disputed the White House's reasons for the war in Iraq. No one was ever charged with the leak, but Vice President Dick Cheney's top aide was convicted of lying in the three-year criminal investigation. Plame, 43, was the unmistakable star witness at Friday's hearing examining the White House's procedures for protecting classified information. Wearing dark pants, a blazer and light makeup, she was seated alone at a long table facing two dozen photographers and 10 House members who each had a color-coded diagram of every person known to have leaked her name. Almost all of the committee members who showed up at the hearing, on a day many House members were out of town, were sympathetic Democrats. Each thanked her for serving her country before proceeding to ask her the same few questions: Was she really covert? "I was a covert officer, correct." Did she give anyone permission to reveal her name? "No." What were the repercussions of the leak? "It has jeopardized and even destroyed entire networks of foreign agents, who in turn risk their own lives and those of their families to provide the United States with needed intelligence," Plame said. "Lives are literally at stake." She disputed those who had repeatedly argued that she was not undercover because she had a "desk job" at CIA headquarters. She said only a handful of people knew she was a CIA agent who had traveled abroad on secret missions as part of the Counterproliferation Division as she tried to find and prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction. But Republican Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia said he has seen no evidence that the leakers knew she was covert. "What we haven't been able to establish here is who knew who was undercover and who was in a covert status," he said. During nearly two hours of testimony, Plame said she and her husband "had indications" for about a week in the summer of 2003 that syndicated columnist Robert Novak might reveal her name. She reported that to her supervisors. A week later, on July 14, 2003, her husband came in with the morning newspaper, throwing it on the bed and declaring: "He did it." "I quickly turned and read the article, and I felt like I had been hit in the gut," she said. "It was over in an instant." Plame has said next to nothing publicly all these years, letting her husband speak for her every chance he gets. She became a Washington celebrity anyway. There was that Vanity Fair photo shoot in a scarf and sunglasses, those A-list parties from Georgetown to Hollywood, and that seven-figure book deal. A movie is in the works. A civil case she and her husband filed against several high-ranking members of the Bush administration will keep their names in the headlines long after their move to New Mexico. Since the Democrats recaptured Congress in November, they have vowed to hold the Bush administration accountable. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee the same one that forced baseball stars to talk about steroid use is not only investigating who leaked Plame's name but also the faulty intelligence that led up to the war in Iraq. The committee had tried to get Plame to testify a half-dozen times but succeeded only after the criminal trial of Cheney's chief of staff, Scooter Libby, ended in a conviction. Plame told lawmakers that she did not ask her husband to go on the Niger trip in 2002 to investigate whether Saddam Hussein had bought uranium, a critical ingredient in nuclear weapons. Plame said a CIA colleague suggested her husband, who had experience in Africa, go to Niger after the vice president's office called her unit asking for information about Iraq's nuclear weapons. Her first reaction, she said, was that her husband's trip would mean she would be alone taking care of the couple's then 2-year-old twins. That same day, Plame's supervisor asked her to ask Wilson to come to CIA headquarters for a meeting the next week. The supervisor also asked her to summarize the plan in an e-mail to the Counterproliferation Division chief. Part of the e-mail would be used by her critics to show that she pushed Wilson for the trip. "I did not recommend him," she said. "I did not suggest him. There was no nepotism involved. I did not have the authority." That conflicts with senior officials at the CIA and State Department, who testified during Libby's trial and told Congress that Plame recommended her husband. Now that Plame is finally talking, she doesn't plan to stop. She is scheduled to appear on MSNBC today in her first national TV interview. Times researcher Angie Drobnic Holan contributed to this report. Anita Kumar can be reached at akumar@sptimes.com or 202-463-0576. Time line of events in CIA leak case The conviction of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby followed 10 days of jury deliberations on charges stemming from the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name, though not the crime of exposing a covert agent. 2003 Jan. 28: President Bush asserts in his State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." March 19-20: The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq begins. May 6: New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof reports that a former ambassador, whom he does not name, had been sent to Niger in 2002 and reported to the CIA and State Department well before Bush's speech that the uranium story was unequivocally wrong. May 29: Libby asks an undersecretary of state about the Niger trip and learns that Joseph Wilson was the former ambassador who went. June 11 or 12: The undersecretary tells Libby that Wilson's wife works at the CIA and that State Department personnel believe she helped plan the trip. June 11 or 12: Vice President Dick Cheney advises Libby that Wilson's wife works at the CIA. June 13: Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward interviews Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage for a book. Armitage tells Woodward in a taped interview that Wilson's wife works for the CIA. June 23: Libby meets with New York Times reporter Judith Miller. During the meeting, Miller says, Libby tells her that Wilson's wife might work for the CIA. Libby denies saying that. July 6: The New York Times publishes an opinion piece by Wilson under the headline "What I Didn't Find in Africa" and appears on NBC's Meet the Press. Wilson doubts Iraq obtained uranium from Niger, and said he thought Cheney's office knew the results of his trip. July 7: Libby meets with then-White House press secretary Ari Fleischer. Fleischer says Libby tells him Wilson's wife works at the CIA and the information is "hush hush." Libby denies that. July 8: Columnist Robert Novak interviews Armitage, who tells him Wilson's wife works for the CIA. Novak says White House political adviser Karl Rove confirmed it the next day. July 10: Libby calls NBC newsman Tim Russert to complain about a colleague's news coverage. At the end of the conversation, Libby says, Russert tells him that "all the reporters know" that Wilson's wife works at the CIA. Russert denies saying it. July 11: Fleischer, on a presidential trip to Africa, tells two reporters that Wilson's wife works for the CIA. Rove tells Time magazine's Matthew Cooper that Wilson's wife works for the CIA. July 14: Columnist Novak writes that Wilson's wife is a CIA operative and that two unnamed senior administration officials said she suggested sending her husband to Niger to investigate the uranium story. Sept. 26: A criminal investigation is authorized to determine who leaked Plame's identity to reporters. Disclosing the identity of CIA operatives is illegal. Oct. 14 and Nov. 26: Libby is interviewed by FBI agents. Dec. 30: U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald in Chicago is named to head the leak investigation. 2004 January: A grand jury begins investigating possible violations of federal criminal laws. March 5 and March 24: Libby testifies before the grand jury. Libby tells jurors he forgot the information about Plame working for the CIA until he heard it from Russert. 2005 Oct. 28: Libby is indicted on five counts: obstruction of justice and two counts each of false statement and two counts of perjury. 2006 Sept. 7: Armitage admits he leaked Plame's identity to Novak and to Woodward. Armitage says he did not realize Plame's job was covert. 2007 Jan. 23: With jury selection complete, the trial begins. Feb. 20: Prosecution and defense attorneys make closing arguments. Feb. 21: Jurors begin deliberations. March 6: Jurors return guilty verdicts on charges of obstruction, perjury and lying to the FBI. A not guilty verdict was returned on one count of lying to an FBI agent.
[Last modified March 17, 2007, 02:06:54]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Zyskamdar
|
03/18/07 07:15 PM
|
|
Please explain how anyone leaked or outed MS. PLANE/WILSON when in point of fact MS. WILSON JOE WILSON published in WHO'S WHO that she was a C.I.A. employee well before the 'kerfuffle' with LIBBY/ARMITAGE et al??? How could she still be 'covert'???
|
|
by Gilbert
|
03/18/07 01:04 AM
|
|
This absolutely embarassing, the VP of the US, outing an operative. Had he served in the military, he would've known to shut up. As for Ms. Plame and her husband, they have done more for the US than the Pres, VP or any of their political cronies!
|
|
by Joe
|
03/18/07 12:50 AM
|
|
Is the watergate surveillance cop still in jail? Does MI6 betray its agents? Do we use polonium ?
|
|
by jim
|
03/17/07 06:32 PM
|
|
another left wing witch hunt i'd be more interested in hearing about berger who commited a crime !
|
|
by Paul
|
03/17/07 04:43 PM
|
|
Sometimes the truth takes some time to be said and heard. The Congress must continue its investigations into this corrupt administration.
|
|
by Tommy
|
03/17/07 03:55 PM
|
|
The more she talks, the higher the price of the book & Movie. The idea that her husband could report with any sincerity is biased by his anti-war anti-bush ideolgy. Balderdash!
|
|
by Len
|
03/17/07 03:51 PM
|
|
First time I've read St Petersburgh Times article. Bill O'Reilly is right. Good Grief! Can you gush any more? How can anyone believe this stuff. As a newspaper you are a disgrace.Wilson and Plame are left wing jokes. AND--you're serious! Says it all.
|
|
by Brant
|
03/17/07 03:35 PM
|
|
She was an analyst who drove to CIA HQ in Langley for work, every day. No way she was a NOC. If she was supposed to be NOC, then the CIA is more incompetent than I thought.
|
|
by RIck
|
03/17/07 12:10 PM
|
|
Anyone who would try and defend what the administration did is too far gone. These are smart guys with security clearances. Don't you think using the excuse that no one told them that she was an undercover/covert agent is child-like?
|
|
by Ken2
|
03/17/07 10:33 AM
|
|
Geezersgal - look at the time line again - where do you see any reference to the CIA filing a complaint with the Justice Department?? This whole issue arose from the howling wolves - not through any official channel! Duh!
|
|
by geezersgal
|
03/17/07 09:54 AM
|
|
Obviously the CIA considered her covert or they would not have filed a complaint with the Justice Department! Duh!
|
|
by Ken2
|
03/17/07 09:51 AM
|
|
Geezersgal - absolutely correct - but what did he report when he returned from Niger???? Know that and you will know all!!!
|
|
by Brant
|
03/17/07 09:50 AM
|
|
Why no mention of the bi-partisan Senate Intel Committee's findings that 1, Plame DID recommend Wilson for the trip; and 2, Wilson lied about his own oral report to the CIA when he claimed that there was no evidence Iraq sought uranium from Niger.
|
|
by geezersgal
|
03/17/07 09:17 AM
|
|
So whatif she had sent her husband to Niger! He was an obvious choice to make the trip as he had many contacts there. Why would that have made Wilsons report any different? Bush makes Nixon look like a saint in retrospect!
|
|
by Jim
|
03/17/07 09:03 AM
|
|
She was not covert. Covert is SECRET. Everyone knew who she was
|
|
by ken
|
03/17/07 02:57 AM
|
|
UNAMERICAN, YOU'RE ALL FIRED
|
|
by IssyWise
|
03/17/07 02:33 AM
|
|
Our president and VP uncovered a covert CIA operative to win a political trick in the press. They pose as supporters of the men and women risking lives for America, but would sell one out this cheap. How despicable! What petty politicians!
|
|