St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Details of killing caught on tape

Jurors view a videotape recorded during a friend's visit to the suspect in jail.

By JOSE CARDENAS
Published March 21, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

In a videotaped jail visitation, Eric G. Davis recounted to a friend that he first shot his wife in the arm.

"Then I just said (expletive) it. I just kept going," Davis is heard saying in the tape, which was played for jurors Tuesday during Davis' first-degree murder trial.

On the tape, Davis adds that he put the "last two bullets in her head as she was trying to open the ... door."

Davis, 28, stands accused of shooting Krystal Lee Davis, 26, in March 2006 in their duplex on Maple Way Street in Safety Harbor.

The couple lived there with four children: two she had from a previous marriage and two they had together.

Witness Robin Cannady told investigators that the night of the killing, Eric Davis came to her home with a group of friends she had been drinking with earlier that night.

Someone in that group told Cannady that they had picked up Krystal Davis and taken her home, and that Eric Davis went inside with her. While waiting for Davis outside his home, the rest of the group heard gunshots, and he came out alone. When he arrived at Cannady's home, he had blood on his shoes, authorities said.

Davis initially told investigators he shot her because he suspected her of cheating.

On the last day of testimony at Davis' trial, Assistant State Attorney Robin Augello showed jurors videotapes of two visits between Davis and longtime friend Vicki Hendry, 34, of Clearwater.

Arguing in part that Davis is mentally ill, defense attorney Edward Liebling asked Hendry whether she knew that Davis was trying to get help for his conditions.

"No, sir, not that I'm aware of," answered Hendry, who is caring for the Davises' two younger children, ages 3 and 5.

Defense attorneys put psychologist Sidney J. Merin on the witness stand.

Merin testified that Davis' unstable upbringing included physical abuse inflicted on him by his parents, who eventually did not play a role in his life. He said Davis' history of mental illness included a diagnosis of depression when he was 15.

Among his own diagnoses, Merin said Davis has bipolar disorder of the manic phase, impulse control disorder and that his long-term substance abuse may have been resulted from his rough upbringing.

One behavior resulting from the mental illnesses is overreacting to a perceived slight, defense attorneys argue.

In the videotape, Davis said he hated his wife partly because she abused the children.

"That's why I don't have any remorse for what I've done," he says. "I know it sounds messed up."

Davis' mental disorders are also responsible for various explanations he has given for his actions on the night of the shooting, Merin said.

Statements Davis has made that in some instances appear to be show premeditation can't be relied upon, defense attorneys argue.

"The main thrust of the doctor's testimony is you can't believe anything (Davis) says," defense attorney Serbo Simeoni said during a recess in the trial.

Assistant State Attorney Brian Daniels asked Merin about what Davis told the psychologist about the shooting.

"Did he tell you that he had the gun on his lap, thinking?" Daniels asked.

"Ask him again in a week and he may give you a different story," Merin said.

Daniels noted that Davis shot his wife, reloaded the gun bullet by bullet and shot her again as she was trying to open the door.

"Would that suggest to you that Mr. Davis had more of an opportunity to reflect on what he was doing?" Daniels asked.

"We don't know whether he was reflecting or this behavior was simply automatic," Merin said.

Daniels asked Merin what he would have thought if he knew Davis had told a prisoner in jail, "I'm trying to get to the mental hospital so I can do 10 years."

Said Merin, "That would have been interesting to know but it would have been (just) another factor."

Closing arguments are expected today.

[Last modified March 20, 2007, 21:26:19]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Sam 04/17/07 02:46 PM
He deserved what he got. None of you have much right to claim to know right and wrong. And just for the record I am the daughter of the main witness in this trial and the sister of the children he left orphans. Please pray for us and him. Thank you
by Daddy 03/25/07 08:18 PM
3 out of the 4 kids will have the same excuse come up in there trial in 15 years
by GAD 03/23/07 04:28 PM
I read the words 'he had a bad childhood.' Has the court considered the four YOUNG CHILDREN left behind. One dead Mom and a Dad that killed the Mom because of this mans poor childhood? I pray for this family.
by Lynn 03/23/07 07:57 AM
His childhood was beyond abusive, but more like horrific. However, he knew exactly what he was doing, not jealous controlling and long term abusive and the kids are in good homes doing well, don't assume their lives are ruined. You all need lives.
by ek 03/21/07 09:40 PM
The jury chose not to punish him too severely, although he didn`t qualify for the death penalty.THE JURY FOUND THIS MANIPULATER ONLY GUILTY OF 2ND DEGREE MURDER!! POOR THING!
by Ursula 03/21/07 08:46 PM
The justice system needs to get rid of these hired gun psychologists and just let the jury use common sense. This guy decided to kill his wife plan and simple. Lock him up and throw away the key!
by TB 03/21/07 07:18 PM
He was not pleading not guilty by reason of mental defect. His attorneys only wanted second degree murder considered and the jury considered and agreed. Unfortunately 4 children are left behind to live a bad childhood because of his actions.
by Ron 03/21/07 05:15 PM
Whether he is insane or not is a reasonable question to debate. What is not reasonable is the idea of "NOT GUILTY due to insanity". This needs to be removed from the books and be reaplced with "GUILTY Due to insanity". He is guilty of the crime.
by paul 03/21/07 03:55 PM
the attorneys are just doing their job and putting on the only defense they have. he will be found guilty of first, and they will use this same medical testimony to try and have his life spared. no one is walking away free and clear...calm down.
by Angie 03/21/07 03:09 PM
I am so tired of criminals wanting to blame their abusive child hood for the crimes they have committed. I was abused by my mother, and yet I dont have a problem living by the law. And as for substance abuse,it doesnt matter in a child custody suit
by Mark in Toronto 03/21/07 01:45 PM
This animal is definitely insane. No "sane" person kills another in cold blood. As for "Not guilty by reason of insanity" plea? This is insane in and of itself! He should be "GUILTY by reason of insanity" and treated and punished appropriately.
by BooBoo 03/21/07 01:39 PM
thats Discpicible.
by allicia 03/21/07 01:37 PM
this story is boring
by DANIEL 03/21/07 01:17 PM
Iam so fed up with people using a bad background as an excuse for whatever they want to do to someone else. People are exposed to right and wrong even if they have a hx of abuse. They know they are doing wrong and do it anyway.Because THEY want to!
by Mark 03/21/07 12:09 PM
Carol, get off your soap box. There are indeed times for a mental illness defense and despite what you think you know, it's very rarely used or granted. Read a book.
by Carol 2. 03/21/07 11:48 AM
To Frank - are you insane? The court should let him go free because he can't help it? What if the next victim of his "mental disorder" is a member of your family? Mental illness is an over-used defense and should be banned.
by Carol 03/21/07 11:07 AM
To Frank.............STOP IT
by frank 03/21/07 10:35 AM
he's a victim of his upbringing - he should be found not guilty - he has a mental disorder - that in its self is reason enough to let him free - he can't help it...
by Diane 03/21/07 10:30 AM
Damn, if depression is a defense, then anyone can kill anybody they want and be free and clear! He knew what he was doing, I don't give a hairy rat's a$s what he says. Shoot him and be done with it, the scum bag!!!
by amazed 03/21/07 10:13 AM
What ever happened to the principal of being responsible for our behavior?
by Robert 03/21/07 10:04 AM
I think that he should do 20 years because he's not mental and he knows what he did.
by Linda 03/21/07 09:53 AM
Ohhhh..he had a terrible childhood,they should just let him go then. NOT.Adults today with bad upbringings seem to be the majority, you have 2 choices, carry on the legacy or break the cycle. IT IS A CHOICE. mental illness my a**. Jealous husband.
by ek 03/21/07 08:00 AM
She had not been out drinking with friends. he had! she was at work and the so called friends had picked her up.
by Michael 03/21/07 05:02 AM
Is anyone else tired of this "Mentally ill" defense crap?
by Carol 03/20/07 11:10 PM
Okay- Here we go with another violent murder due to someone getting their but kicked when they were a kid. I'd like to stay and chat, but my Mom whipped me with a belt years ago so I have to go plan, act and execute harm to someone. Later...........
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT