St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Hospital execs stand by quality

By JODIE TILLMAN
Published March 22, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

By the looks of all those minus marks, Pasco County's five hospitals didn't fare well in a national evaluation released this week.

Two hospitals, Regional Medical Center at Bayonet Point and Florida Hospital Zephyrhills, performed below average in treating heart attacks, heart failure and pneumonia, according to the report by the Joint Commission, the nation's leading hospital accreditation agency. And none of the county's hospitals performed above the national average in treating the three conditions.

So what should Pasco County residents make of the findings? The Joint Commission says some hospitals are better than others in treating certain conditions and recommends patients do their homework.

Local administrators, meanwhile, cautioned against drawing conclusions about their hospitals based on the three overall scores.

Sometimes they say the explanation is in the documentation. Medical staff may have done what they were supposed to do but did not document it, said Regional Medical Center spokesman Kurt Conover.

"If you don't happen to record it, the data doesn't show up," he said, adding that the hospital has improved the documentation process since July 2006, the most recent date for which the Joint Commission's data is available.

Conover and others also said that there are other measurement tools for hospitals. He cited the American Heart Association's recognition of Regional Medical Center last summer as having exceeded the association's guidelines for cardiac and stroke care.

Community Hospital now includes the disbursement of aspirin in its admission and discharge orders for heart attack patients, said the hospital's quality control manager, Susanne Gammon. She said that some doctors had previously told patients to pick up aspirin at the drugstore but didn't document that request.

In addition, administrators say, the number of patients treated is so low in some cases that the overall score may be misleading.

Gammon said that in one quarter, Community Hospital had four heart attack patients who should have, within 30 minutes of arrival, received a medication that breaks up blood clots. Two did. A third was delayed because the patient refused to take it initially, she said. A fourth received the medication a couple of minutes after the 30-minute guideline.

The result: a 50 percent compliance rate.

"Just a couple of failures can cause your numbers to skew," Gammon said.

Each condition is graded on how the hospital fared on a number of different performance measures.

Under heart attack care, for instance, the benchmarks include: Did the patients get aspirin on arrival? Were they offered advice on how to quit smoking?

The study looked at how many patients were eligible for each treatment option and what percentage actually got it.

The report tallied up all the patients who were eligible for each treatment, and the percentage who got it, and rolled those numbers into the final figure, said Joint Commission spokeswoman Charlene Hill. A hospital that received a below-average score may have performed well on some treatments but received low scores on others.

Jim Conway, senior vice president at the nonprofit Institute for Healthcare Improvement in Boston, said the report can be an important education tool. He said he hopes patients use it to ask questions of their doctors.

He said history has shown that such reports are viewed more often by hospitals and insurance companies than by patients. Still, he said, the report is part of "an agenda for accountability."

Gammon, the Community Hospital official, said she realized people might be taken aback when they see signs signifying below-average performance in some areas. But she said the data is not new to hospitals, which have been making changes to do better on future surveys.

"We're already addressing" some of the problems in the report, she said. "We take this very seriously."

Jodie Tillman can be reached at (727) 869-6247 or jtillman@sptimes.com.

[Last modified March 22, 2007, 01:05:42]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by laura 04/06/07 08:47 AM
they should sent some of their dr.s back to school. they can't tell the difference from a hair line fracture and a deep tissue bruse. so i know not to go there if i am dying. be better off fixing my self be about the same what do you think so terribe
by Dave 03/22/07 06:53 PM
I BET IF THE HOSPITAL EXECUTIVES FAMILY WOULD NEVER EVER EVER WAIT 4 HOURS IN A EMERGENCY ROOM. THEY WOULD GET THE RED CARPET TREATMENT........AND I BET THEY WOULD HOLD OVER SOME NURSES FOR THEM TOO, AND PROBABLY HAVE THE KITCHEN OPEN.
by Tom 03/22/07 04:38 PM
Dick...your individual problem that you had is the fundamental problem with healthcare in this country. Dr. keep getting richer as the costs rise. Of course, the hospital execs point to this or that...let the spin begin.
by Dick 03/22/07 10:12 AM
Baynett point hosp. didnt rate normal but they sure rate high in billindg. my hospital bill foe 9 days 120,000 dollars for emergency sergury from Drs goof--some one getting rich NUFF SAID
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT