Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Crist: Get rid of touch screens
The governor tells Congress that he will push for optical-scan ballots in Florida.
By BILL ADAIR
Published March 24, 2007
WASHINGTON - Touch-screen voting machines would be virtually eliminated from Florida counties under a new plan from Gov. Charlie Crist. Speaking to a congressional panel that is examining nationwide election reforms, Crist said he will ask the Florida Legislature to adopt a new plan that would replace touch-screen machines used in early voting with optical-scan ballots. Crist's previous proposal had called for replacing the touch-screen machines used on Election Day with optical-scan ballots, but it would have allowed counties to keep using touch-screen machines for early voting, which accounted for about 20 percent of all votes in the 2006 general election. The touch-screen machines were necessary in early voting because they could display ballots from different precincts. Otherwise, a county would have to stock ballots for every precinct at each early voting site. Crist said his new proposal would rely on "ballot on demand" machines that could print a custom ballot for each early voter. The optical-scan ballot would be customized for the voter's precinct and would provide the paper trail that state officials want in the event of an election dispute. Touch-screen machines are used for early voting in 29 of Florida's 67 counties, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, Pasco and Sarasota. Crist's new plan would eliminate virtually all touch-screen machines. A single machine would be left at each polling place that could be used by visually impaired voters. "I think people expect and deserve to be able to have a verifiable paper trail in the most important thing we do in this country - exercise our right to democracy and freedom," Crist said after his testimony. The ballot-on-demand plan would actually reduce the overall cost of improving Florida's voting systems because the state would not have to pay to retrofit touch-screen machines with printers. Crist's original plan would have cost $32.5-million, but the revised plan would cost $28-million. The state has already received a separate $7-million for the polling-place machines for visually impaired voters. Crist said that if the Legislature approves the request, the new machines should be in place for the primary elections in the fall of 2008. He said he did not know whether they could be in place for the presidential primary, which is likely to be held in late January or early February next year. Crist's announcement was praised by Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Boca Raton. "The short and disastrous era of electronic voting machines in Florida has come to an end," said Wexler, adding that he hopes Crist's proposal "can serve as a model for the nation." Washington Bureau Chief Bill Adair can be reached at adair@sptimes.com or 202 463-0575.
[Last modified March 24, 2007, 01:01:41]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Laura
|
03/26/07 05:03 PM
|
|
We need confidence in the system. Computerized systems aren't providing that. We should also allow felons to vote once they have served their time. That would eliminate a lot of the hanky panky that goes on with "felon" lists on election and before
|
|
by Logan
|
03/25/07 04:10 AM
|
|
Somehow, I think there may never be an absolute answer to the voting problem in Florida. Even if it were possible to make voting so fundamentally easy, a 3 year old could do it, there'd still be people who would have some sort of difficulty.
|
|
by cargo
|
03/24/07 05:59 PM
|
|
Anybody who is too stupid to figure out a punch card probably shouldn't vote anyhow.
|
|
by Good'n
|
03/24/07 05:57 PM
|
|
Bravo!
|
|
by Drew Finn
|
03/24/07 05:31 PM
|
|
Cool - let's bring back the old voting machines - pull the lever to close the curtain and flip the switches. They made you feel like you were really voting.
|
|
by Mary
|
03/24/07 03:18 PM
|
|
What a waste of money. Just add paper receipt to your touch screen ballot and sturdier stands, and everything should be ok. Don't spend more money for a whole new system. Agree w/ Jay. And optical was just fine in Leon so why didn't we start w/ that?
|
|
by Jason
|
03/24/07 02:08 PM
|
|
Some kind of paper trail is only reasonable. Just because it is possible to vote via shady computer methods doesn't mean it is a good idea.
|
|
by how
|
03/24/07 01:26 PM
|
|
Now that the bush reigns are over, the damage is done. They got what they wanted... so does it really matter? They hijacked the elections already and nobody cares.
|
|
by Paul
|
03/24/07 01:11 PM
|
|
Optical scanning machines like in Leon County, Florida - absolutely the best I have ever seen, heard or read about.
|
|
by Cheryl
|
03/24/07 12:13 PM
|
|
Optical scanners ARE paper ballots and work fine in Ohio and in early voting.
|
|
by Tim
|
03/24/07 11:23 AM
|
|
Optical scan technology is paper based. As long as there's a paper trail, it works for me.
|
|
by Sean
|
03/24/07 11:21 AM
|
|
Bring back the punch cards! Paper trail, check, no computer security issues, check. And it appears ANY ballot counting method will have bellyaching by the losers, so let's go back to what worked for decades.
|
|
by Biff
|
03/24/07 08:19 AM
|
|
No! No! No! Charlie, either you don't get it, or you are no better than any other politician out to screw the public! Like oil and water, computers (any kind) and voting do not mix! Paper ballots! Manual counts! The ONLY (nearly) HONEST way!
|
|
by Jay
|
03/24/07 07:25 AM
|
|
This is stupid. The morons will still find a way to not fill the bubble, and we'll repeat the hanging chad fiasco. Most sensible way is for voters to write names of their selections. Can't write? That means you also cannot think & shouldn't vote.
|
|