Last mission to repair the Hubble telescope Hubble space telescope discoveries have enriched our understanding of the cosmos. In this special report, you will see facts about the Hubble space telescope, discoveries it has made and what the last mission's goals are.
For their own good
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
They're labels for "moist smokeless tobacco." It usually comes in round tins that range from over $4 a pop to discount brands for under $1.
Besides the major battles being waged in our Legislature this year, there's a spirited little war among the various smokeless brands.
One of the Big Four smokeless companies, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco (Skoal, Copenhagen) wants to change the way Florida taxes the product.
The other three companies prefer to keep things the way they are: R.J. Reynolds' sister company Conwood (Kodiak, Grizzly), Jacksonville's Swisher International (Silver Creek, Kayak, Redwood), and a foreign company called Swedish Match.
It comes down to the way Florida taxes "sin" and consumption - the type of levy known as an "excise" tax.
Buy a pack of cigarettes in Florida, and you pay a state excise tax of 33.9 cents, no matter if it's the fanciest smoke on the market. (You pay a sales tax too, but this fight is over the excise tax).
Not so with smokeless tobacco. Florida taxes it in a variable way - 25 percent of the wholesale price.
That's bad for high-end labels like Skoal and Copenhagen, but an advantage for "discount" brands that have rapidly grown in market share. Many customers have "traded down" to less expensive labels.
This brings us to House Bill 523 and Senate Bill 2402, which would switch Florida to a weight-based tax on smokeless tobacco. The Senate bill has a hearing Tuesday.
The effect would be to increase prices of the discount brands while making premium labels less expensive. Supposedly the state's take would stay about the same.
U.S. Smokeless contends it's about more than just gaining a leg up. Robert Shepherd, a consultant for the company, argues the switch would be better and simpler for tax collections, which have been snarled in lawsuits, and it would remove a loophole in which excise taxes can be lowered by fiddling with prices.
"Nobody would tolerate giving a tax subsidy to cheap cigarettes," Shepherd says.
Florida TaxWatch, the business-backed watchdog group, agrees in a position paper that "a uniform tax for all brands avoids erosion of the tax base."
Veteran lobbyist Ken Plante represents Swisher. "This is plainly and simply a way to grab some the market back," he says. Most states tax the product the way Florida does, and the state gets a benefit when prices go up, he says.
So, who to cheer for? If you agree with TaxWatch on the tax-policy question, or want a little break on your Skoal, then support the bills. If you want to keep the cheapest stuff cheap, oppose them.
And if you're a public-health advocate who wants to know why we're talking about which part of the tobacco industry to side with in the first place? Sorry, wrong number.
* * *
In the spirit of shameless self-promotion, I need to mention again that Tuesday from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. I'll be answering questions and comments from readers in an online chat on my blog.
Get to TroxBlog by going to www.tampabay.com, clicking on the "Blogs" link and looking for me. Or you can type in the address: blogs.tampabay.com/troxler.