Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Ballfields' location still unclear
The proposed site - Brooker Creek Preserve - comes with obstacles.
By THERESA BLACKWELL
Published March 26, 2007
EAST LAKE - The number of ballfields proposed for the piney acres in the Brooker Creek Preserve has been downsized from four to three by the East Lake Youth Sports Association. But still unknown is whether the group will get permits to build those three fields. And if it does get permits, it's not certain where the fields would go. It turns out the site envisioned for the fields - 38.5 acres Pinellas County has leased to the association for $1 per year - not only has wetlands and wildlife, but it also is partly in a 100-year flood plain controlled by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. That's important because to build ballfields, land elevations would need to be raised. And doing that would affect flood patterns. Then, the excavation needed to offset raised lands would reduce lands available for ballfields. This new consideration is just the latest twist in what has been a protracted effort by the youth group to get the okay for ballfields in the preserve. Preservationists have worked hard to thwart the plans for the fields. As an alternative to Brooker Creek, county commissioners have directed staff to look for possible sites elsewhere in the East Lake area. The youth group's new plans to build three, rather than four fields, might make it easier to find alternative sites. Commissioner Karen Seel said Friday she would like to see whether the fields could go on property owned by Pinellas County schools at the southeast corner of East Lake and Keystone roads. The school district has tentative plans for a school on the western portion of the 44-acre property, said Paul Cozzie, the county's director of culture, education and leisure. The eastern portion is lower in elevation, and wetter. "I don't know how much of that is buildable," he said. Cozzie said county staff continues to meet with school officials to consider the location, but he added that they are also looking at property on the Cypress Woods Elementary School grounds and property adjacent to East Lake High School. The two sites both have wetlands, Cozzie said, so he doesn't know what can be built there. Against all this talk, children are registering for youth sports programs at record rates, said Kutchins. "We're beating the hell out of the fields and now we're going to be beating them more," he said. He said the association has 10 fields on property it owns, but it needs about five to 10 more to accommodate all the children who want to play. "We're just living with this," he said, "and it's a travesty." Theresa Blackwell can be reached at tblackwell@sptimes.com or 727 445-4170.
[Last modified March 25, 2007, 23:32:37]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Drew Finn
|
03/26/07 10:50 PM
|
|
Ballfields and such really don't matter anyway. Sooner or later the entire area will be covered with condos if the developers who run our state have their way anyway.
|
|
by Jane
|
03/26/07 04:29 PM
|
|
The East Lakers would shut up their whining quick if they could see the fields the rest of the county's youth soccer players have to use. Come on down and trip in the holes at Southside or Northeast! Share the muddied HS AND MS field at Seminole!
|
|
by Maria
|
03/26/07 03:52 PM
|
|
I hear that the trees were planted and the original ecosystem is long gone. But it is still a place of peace and beauty....perhaps one of the last places in Pinellas that can be called that.
|
|
by Sam
|
03/26/07 03:34 PM
|
|
I think we have enough ball parks in pinellas, as a voter I was on a committee when the county wanted our input, I voiced we need MORE GREEN SPACE
|
|
by John
|
03/26/07 01:38 PM
|
|
There are quite a few golf courses in the East Lake area - use them for ball fields.
|
|
by Bill
|
03/26/07 01:08 PM
|
|
If there are so many obsticles in the way, why don't those who want to play ball think of other places to build and play. How about school and church properties? Preserve the natural lands and wildlife and don't put other property in danger of flood.
|
|
by Reggie
|
03/26/07 12:06 PM
|
|
All interested parties should contact our County Government and let their voices be heard. Urge our County Government to protect these preserves/endangered lands from non preserve uses for as long as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
|
|
by JT
|
03/26/07 10:13 AM
|
|
It is a shame that voters did not get to decide the fate of the Brooker Creek property before it was purchased and declared a "Preserve".My intuition tells me that some special interest absorbed folks would not have been so selfish about the use then
|
|
by Jo
|
03/26/07 09:22 AM
|
|
Brooker Creek Preserve. What part of "PRESERVE" do these people not understand?
|
|