St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Court says Tampa owes $18-million

By COLLEEN JENKINS
Published March 31, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

TAMPA - The city of Tampa is back on the hook for a nearly $18-million jury award owed to a man who crashed with a city Water Department truck.

Eleven years after the near-fatal wreck, Ramiro G. Companioni Jr. hasn't received a penny from the verdict.

Until Friday, it looked as though the trial was headed for a do-over.

City attorneys had persuaded Circuit Judge Herbert Baumann to order a new trial after they learned that two jurors failed to disclose felony convictions.

But the 2nd District Court of Appeal on Friday reversed the Hillsborough judge's ruling and said the personal injury award from the 2004 trial - the largest ever against the city - should stand.

Attorneys on both sides of the case learned about the opinion from a news reporter. One was happy with the appellate decision.

"This is wonderful!" said Dominic O. Fariello, who argued the appeal for Companioni in March 2006.

One wasn't.

"We're disappointed," city attorney David Smith said.

Companioni's motorcycle slammed into the back of a city truck Nov. 26, 1996, on Hillsborough Avenue near 50th Street. His attorney argued that the truck caused the crash by veering dangerously across three lanes of traffic.

Companioni, once a successful chef, learned to walk again after nearly having his legs amputated. His right knee was fused and he could not bend at the waist. He now sells hot dogs outside Tampa Bay Buccaneers games and at car dealerships.

The two judges in the majority wrote that the city failed to prove that an unfair jury issued the verdict.

The judges said some unqualified people inevitably land on jury panels because prospective jurors self-report their criminal histories. But their presence alone, without proof of bias or prejudice, was not enough to set aside a jury verdict.

In a concurring opinion, Judge Darryl Casanueva said the city might make a case for prejudice. But he faulted the attorneys who represented the city at trial for not questioning jurors about their criminal backgrounds even though one juror admitted on a questionnaire to having been accused of a crime.

The latest decision still leaves 44-year-old Companioni with "a paper verdict," his attorney said.

Any judgement of more than $100,000 against a city requires approval by the state Legislature. That process itself can take years.

Smith said the city has other appellate issues pending before the trial court and will talk with its outside counsel to determine what steps to take next.

Fariello is hopeful a settlement might now be reached in mediation.

Colleen Jenkins can be reached at 813 226-3337 or cjenkins@sptimes.com.

[Last modified March 31, 2007, 01:13:44]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT