Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Unfixed dogs may cost their owners
By BILL VARIAN
Published April 3, 2007
TAMPA - Letting Sparky keep his swagger could soon cost his owners some cash in Hillsborough County. County Animal Services is mulling whether to impose an annual fee of as much as $150 on dog owners who refuse to get their animals fixed, an idea that's getting pooh-poohed by pet breeders. The proposal also calls for a litter fee for each brood produced. The proposal is not so much aimed at reducing the number of unwanted dogs who end up at the animal shelter, though that would be a side benefit. Rather, it seeks to cut down on dog bites. Animal Services records show that these so-called "intact" dogs are responsible for nearly 75 percent of dog bite incidents reported in Hillsborough County since 2000. Most of the offender dogs are male, though the new fee would apply to intact females as well. "We're looking at this as an opportunity to take public safety, with respect to dog bites, to another level," said Bill Armstrong, the county's Animal Services director. Hillsborough County Commissioner Kevin White last month asked Animal Services to explore additional ways of addressing dangerous dogs. His request came after a highly publicized mauling of a Plant City toddler by a family pit bullterrier tethered to a tree. "It's very unfortunate that law-abiding citizens have to compensate for the people not abiding by the rules," White said. Animal Services has pitched a number of ideas to an advisory panel, from increasing educational efforts to adding staff to more proactively comb neighborhoods to bumping up fines for people who fail to register their dogs. So far, the intact dog and litter fees have drawn the most ire. "I'm not convinced that spay and neutering a dog will change its personality to the degree that it's being proposed," said Mary Manning-Stolz, a former member of the advisory committee who has since spoken in opposition to the proposal, though she now lives in Pasco County. "I think that's simply a Band-Aid to look like you're doing something." Manning, who breeds long-haired dachshunds and is president of the Tampa Bay Kennel Club, said it's already expensive to show dogs, which cannot be fixed in some competitions. She said the county should more stringently address problem dogs and their owners. Dawn Williams, of South Tampa, who recently sold a chihuahua-dachshund designer mixed breed known as a chiwheenie by placing a newspaper classified ad, noted that a veterinary visit for shots, registration and neutering can get expensive. "They should pay us to get them fixed," she said. Armstrong, with Animal Services, said none of the proposals are firm. He is taking them to commissioners for guidance Wednesday.
[Last modified April 3, 2007, 07:17:23]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Mary
|
05/19/07 10:41 PM
|
|
Great Idea, I wish they would do that here.
|
|
by orlando
|
05/04/07 10:05 AM
|
|
I have an idea, why dont we spay and nueter the law makers so they have real first hand knowledge, if they go through it with ease then we will do the animals. i would like to know where these stats come from?
|
|
by orlando
|
05/04/07 10:02 AM
|
|
i think it ridiculous to think that spaying or nuetering will keep a dog from attacking, proper education and teaching folks that no matter how cute a dog is they have to keep in mind that they are still pack animals not children.
|
|
by Tom
|
04/17/07 02:44 PM
|
|
Anyone and everyone who owns an intact dog is a breeder and thus intents to profit from the pups. That is enough justification to me for charge them more - aka business rates.
|
|
by Crystal
|
04/06/07 08:34 PM
|
|
I was shocled to find out that the reg. tag money and fines are not A MONEY MAKER for the county. so strick that one from the "HATERS CLUB LIST"
|
|
by Crystal
|
04/06/07 08:29 PM
|
|
of course Mary Stolz is against it as she is a BREEDER..go figure. Ijust spent time at the animal svs and you wouldnt beleive how many are purebreds. Mr Armstrong should be appaulded He is inthe trenches everyday due to the breeding problem..Enough!
|
|
by Belinda
|
04/05/07 09:37 AM
|
|
Such a great idea!! I love this.
|
|
by Belinda
|
04/05/07 09:33 AM
|
|
What a great idea!!! Its a known fact that most animal bites are from intact pets. Besides, having your pet fixed is much healthier for the animal. Why wouldn't anyone want them spayed or neuthered? Maybe because they are a stupid person. Yes!!
|
|
by Nancy
|
04/04/07 03:51 PM
|
|
Pets, both cats & dogs, should be fixed, but it will not solve the problem. Owners who have their animals registered are the ones who will be paying. I do think it should be manditory to have your pet microchiped.
|
|
by Anna
|
04/04/07 01:36 AM
|
|
We should enforce this law for dead-beat parents, not dogs. This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of and only seems to me as a way for the county to collect more money from its citizens and boost business at the vet clinic.
|
|
by Kelly
|
04/03/07 10:48 PM
|
|
I agree Cats as well as Dogs should be liscensed and leashed,such as all automibles should have tags ,and be legal.
|
|
by Vic
|
04/03/07 10:02 PM
|
|
Pets that are not "fixed" would NOT be a problem is the procedures were offered for free...PERIOD.
|
|
by pat
|
04/03/07 07:44 PM
|
|
If you want an animal you need to take care of the animal.Why not get your dogs fixed? there are sooooo many unwanted dogs and CATS.
|
|
by Roger
|
04/03/07 06:11 PM
|
|
This is anoher tale of uneducated politicians. Personally, my Golden Retreiver turned agreesive after getting fixed. My Englis Mastiff is unchanged and wouldn't hurt a fly. The owners should be fined or face stricter penalties.
|
|
by Barbara
|
04/03/07 05:46 PM
|
|
Let's fix the humans to keep murders down.
|
|
by Robin
|
04/03/07 05:08 PM
|
|
I agree with HCAS. The problem is growing worse and worse as the years go by. I hope things work out that allows this to happen. Maybe people will take more responsobility by realizing this is the only alternative. Good luck to HCAS.
|
|
by Susan
|
04/03/07 04:30 PM
|
|
I guess the county will make us fix our children when they become disruptive and hurt somebody.
|
|
by Shirley
|
04/03/07 04:25 PM
|
|
Why does EVERYONE always have to be penalized for the few who just don't care. It's the dog owners that s/b responsible, NOT the dog. They are the way we treat & train them. I have a lrg 130lb Rottweiler who is better behaved than most humans.
|
|
by Resident
|
04/03/07 04:11 PM
|
|
Spaying female dogs is major risky surgery especially in older dogs; causes weight gain, diabetes and shortened life expectancy in female and male dogs; and does not fix irresponsible pet owners of unrestrained dangerous dogs i.e. pit bills.
|
|
by michelle
|
04/03/07 04:03 PM
|
|
I think this is just another way to get us breeders to pay more money.I understand there are many unwanted animals but most people do not pay good money for an animal then it turn up in the pound. Dogs that bite will bite reguardless of being fixed.
|
|
by David
|
04/03/07 03:52 PM
|
|
I think any dog should be " fixed " unless it is specifically used for breeding and then it should be registered as such. what about Cat owners ... Cat owners should have to follow All the same rules as dog owners,
Shots, license, Leash.
|
|
by Heidi
|
04/03/07 03:45 PM
|
|
I make a few hundred dollars over the eligiblility limit for assistance. My pet is spayed and licensed and well cared for. Its a lifetime commitment of the animal!
|
|
by Heidi
|
04/03/07 03:42 PM
|
|
I know of several animals that got kicked out of their homes because they weren't fixed and either made a mess by spraying or meowing too much. Boo to the poor judgement of the owners!
|
|
by Heidi
|
04/03/07 03:41 PM
|
|
It is too often that those that do not spay or neuter thier animals..don't consider the amounts of animals that are euthanized due to the effects of indiscriminate breeding. Some people shouldn't have animals...there are alot of irresponsible owners
|
|
by Heidi
|
04/03/07 03:40 PM
|
|
I think that if you can't pan out $150 for your champion blood line animal..you probably shouldn't own one!
|
|
by Heidi
|
04/03/07 03:37 PM
|
|
It's about time...dog and cat owners should be fined for each animal not fixed. There are too many ignorant owners that think that the breeding process is natural /w/out thinking of the consequences.
|
|
by Linda
|
04/03/07 03:15 PM
|
|
this is an excellent idea, the funds collected should help in funding all of the animal facilities that do house adoptable pets
|
|
by Pattie
|
04/03/07 01:43 PM
|
|
Yes, all pets should be spayed and neutered. For every puppy and kitten birth, there are that many shelter animals who cannot find forever homes. I wish Sarasota County had a law like that, too.
|
|
by TANYA
|
04/03/07 12:30 PM
|
|
IF YOU ARE A RESPONSIBLE PET OWNER, THIS ISN'T AN ISSUE. ALL ANIMALS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE FIXED. AN ANNUAL FEE SHOULD BE ENFORCED TO BREED. THERE ARE TO MANY UNWANTED ANIMALS DUE TO STUPID OWNERS. I PRAY IT PASSES.....
|
|
by Terri
|
04/03/07 10:45 AM
|
|
Any responsible pet owner believes in spaying & neutering. Especially if not a purebred animal. The idea that forcing reponsible pet owners to pay a yrly $150 intact fee is going to somehow make the non-responsibe pet owner to pay up is ridiculous!
|
|
by STEVE
|
04/03/07 10:43 AM
|
|
WELL , HERE IS ANOTHER THOUGHT HOW MANY VETERINARIANS PRACTICE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA ? WHAT IF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT WOULD GIVE THEM A " WRITE OFF " AND THEY CAN SUPPLY THESE SERVICES FREE OF CHARGE TO THE PER OWNER ?
|
|
by Sally
|
04/03/07 10:41 AM
|
|
This is an arbitrary and punitive fee. If you want to cut down on dog bites, mandate muzzles!
|
|
by Ralph
|
04/03/07 10:25 AM
|
|
why not license and register all animals in hillsborough county and this should give accountibilty to all animal owners,as car owners we get cited for no seat belt.
If there is no tags daggling from the collar of an animal walking the neighborhood?
|
|
by Kay
|
04/03/07 09:24 AM
|
|
This seems silly to me. Neither of my dogs were fixed and had no aggression. The female was high strung so eventually I got her fixed but I saw absolutely no change in her personality after that. Need to address problem dogs and owners.
|
|
by Rebecca
|
04/03/07 09:15 AM
|
|
Unfortunately, this proposal will only target law-abiding, responsible pet owners and those dogs that are the least likely to bite. Is this just an effort to create revenue????
|
|