St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Clearwater Beach landlords fight ordinance

By MIKE DONILA
Published April 4, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT
photo
[Times photo: Jim Damaske]
Helen Dexter strains to hear a question from City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides on Tuesday. A group of Clearwater Beach property owners is suing the city, saying they should be allowed to continue to rent homes for less than a month at a time. Dexter said her family has rented out their property for many years.

Saying the city of Clearwater never enforced its short-term rental ban until 2003, a group of longtime landlords finally faced the city in court Tuesday in an effort to continue leasing their homes to vacationers.

At issue is whether more than 30 houses along the affluent north beach can be rented for less than a month.

The city contends it has long outlawed short-term rentals in residential neighborhoods but acknowledges that it didn't define "short term" until April 2003. Under the law now, leases of less than one month are prohibited.

But the homeowners say the city never enforced the ban until after 2003. And they argued that short-term leasing has been part of beach life since the 1930s. The property owners are seeking to be exempt from the 2003 language.

The city is "going back in time and trying to prove that rentals of less than a month were prohibited," said Marion Hale, an attorney for the homeowners. "They've got a right to go forward and make it illegal, but they don't have a right to go back."

Tuesday's nearly five-hour bench trial in front of Judge Nelly Khouzam included testimony from nine property owners, real estate brokers and former renters.

"No one ever complained about it," said longtime local attorney and circuit judge Owen Allbritton, 80, a former renter. "And it was very common knowledge that you could rent."

Helen Dexter, 98, said her stepfather built the family's Eldorado Avenue home in 1930 and began renting it out a few years later. Her daughter, Lissa, said the family continues to rent the home to help pay property taxes.

"We're finding it increasingly difficult to keep the house," she said.

But the city argued it is well within its authority to restrict commercial activity in residential settings.

Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said the city codes were established to "protect and preserve the integrity and value of the neighborhood." Commercial uses, like renting short term, are clearly prohibited in the city's laws and have been for decades, she said.

None of the landlords who testified asked city zoning officials if it was okay to lease, and most didn't obtain the occupational licenses needed to rent out property, Dougall-Sides said.

Once city leaders were made aware of the violators in 2003, they began citing them, she said.

While short-term rentals have been going on for decades, it didn't start blossoming until the early 2000s as insurance rates and property taxes increased, and big development started gobbling up beach hotels. Adding to the trend was the Internet and the ease it brought to advertising properties.

As tourists were looking for a place to stay, some second homeowners were looking for a way to bring in more income to pay for the escalating costs to keep their homes.

Instead of charging $1,200 to $2,000 for a month's rent, property owners found they could charge the same price per week.

But complaints from permanent residents also rose. Chief among them: Raymond Massieu, a retired Army lieutenant colonel, who documented case after case of loud noise, trash and traffic jams for city officials.

Massieu, 67, testified Tuesday that he filled five writing pads full of notes, documenting what houses he felt were violating the city's ordinance. During testimony he suggested that some of the homes in the lawsuit weren't used as short-term rentals until after the 2003 ordinance was passed.

Since litigation started, the city has gone after a number of violators but has left the landlords involved in the suit alone.

Judge Khouzam said she'll decide in the next couple of weeks whether to grandfather those homes into the ordinance.

Either side can appeal the ruling.

Fast Facts:

Short-term rentals

The issue: Longtime landlords of short-term rentals in the affluent north Clearwater Beach neighborhood have sued the city for its 2003 attempt to crack down on rentals of less than one month. The landlords say the city's vague, pre-2003 code allowed short-term rentals. But permanent residents have sought the short-term rental ban.

The venue: Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Court

The resolution: Expected from Judge Nelly Khouzam by the end of the month.

[Last modified April 3, 2007, 21:28:54]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Ted 04/10/07 07:46 AM
Carmel-by-the Sea in California has weekly rental homes and motels among million dollar properties and what a thriving community. Wake up to 2007 !
by Quiet professional 04/09/07 09:18 PM
I'm a quiet professional non-drinking family man who is paying $2000 for a weekly rental this month specifically to have a quiet peaceful place to enjoy. Does this spell problems for the locals? I doubt it. They should wake up and see the alternative
by Mike 04/09/07 10:44 AM
I bought my home in 3/2005. Have put over $100K into to improve the neighborhood, but my neighbors think I'm ruining their quality of life because of friends neighbors, etc. coming and going. They spend their days looking at my home. It's harrassment
by Jenn 04/04/07 03:49 PM
Why does the city think renting to people 30 days will attract a better class of people? If the taxes and insurance were not so ridiculous the homes could be rented for less. We all pay when property rights are trampled upon by government.
by JM 04/04/07 03:31 PM
I own resort props and have found that weekly rental homes in older communities are better maintained than the residential homes. In order to generate the revenue the consumer must feel as if they are getting the value expected in a resort area.
by Mary 04/04/07 08:29 AM
What did the city think was going to happen when they ruined affordable lodging?
by Ross 04/04/07 08:06 AM
Not only did virtually all landlords not get an occupational lic. they are required to register with the County if their intent is to rent for less than 6 or 7 months. If the county received 12% tourist tax then why didn't they confirm licenses req.
by Lisa 04/04/07 07:52 AM
The beach motels used the city easement for their private parking for 50 years, but the city still took that land back when it tore up Coronado. Too many beach people want it both ways. They live in 1950 on some issues, in 2007 on others. Selfish!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT