St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Bush blasts war critics

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published April 4, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - President Bush denounced "irresponsible" Democrats on Tuesday for going on spring break without approving money for the Iraq war with no strings. He condemned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's trip to Syria, too, accusing her of encouraging a terrorism sponsor.

With Congress out of town, Bush used his speech in the White House Rose Garden to try to take the upper hand over Democrats who are making increasing forays into foreign policy as his term dwindles and his approval ratings remain low.

Democrats, buoyed by recent Republican defections from Bush on Iraq, shot back that they are the ones pursuing effective solutions overseas in response to a national desire for change from his approach.

"We are not going to allow the president to continue a failed policy in Iraq. We represent the American people's vision on this failed war," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said at a ceremony for a new Nevada National Guard armory near Las Vegas. "We have said time and time again the troops will have everything they need."

Speaking a day before he heads out of town for six days for events in the West and an Easter break at his ranch, the president said Democrats are failing their responsibility to the troops and the nation's security by leaving for their own recess after passing bills to fund the war that contain time lines for American withdrawal.

Given his promised veto of anything containing a deadline - and the likelihood that his veto would be sustained on Capitol Hill - Bush said Democrats are merely engaging in games that "undercut the troops."

"Democrat leaders in Congress seem more interested in fighting political battles in Washington than in providing our troops what they need to fight the battles in Iraq," Bush said.

Nearly two months ago, Bush asked for more than $100-billion to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year. Congress has approved the money, but the Senate added a provision also calling for most U.S. combat troops to be out of Iraq by March 31, 2008. The House version demands a September 2008 withdrawal.

These bills still must be reconciled before legislation can be sent to the president.

"They need to come off their vacation, get a bill to my desk, and if it's got strings and mandates and withdrawals and pork, I'll veto it," the president said. "And then we can get down to the business of getting this thing done."

Not so fast, Democrats responded.

"Americans want compromise, not a cowboy-style showdown," said House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C.

Fresh from a briefing by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the president sought to put pressure on Democrats by detailing ways that delaying the money could harm troops and their families.

After the current $70-billion war appropriation runs out in mid April, Bush said, the military would have to consider cutting back on equipment, repairs and training for National Guard and Reserve forces. After mid May, he said, more steps would be considered, such as delaying or curtailing the training of some active duty forces.

Despite Bush's warnings, dire consequences can be avoided even after the money starts to run out. It has become routine in recent years for Pentagon accountants to move money around in the department's half-trillion-dollar budget to make sure operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are not disrupted. The money is repaid, usually with minimal disruption, when the president signs a new war spending bill.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, Bush and Congress have about three months to resolve their standoff before Iraq operations would actually be affected.

On another topic, the president took issue with a two-day stay in Syria by Pelosi that began Tuesday.

As the speaker prepared for meetings today with Syrian President Bashar Assad, Bush said she was sending dangerous signals.

State-run newspapers in Syria published news of the visit on their front pages, with one daily publishing a photograph of Pelosi next to the headline, "Welcome Dialogue."

Bush said meetings with many high-level Americans have done nothing to persuade Assad to control violent elements of the militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah, to halt efforts to destabilize Lebanon or to stop allowing "foreign fighters" from flowing over Syria's border into Iraq.

[Last modified April 4, 2007, 01:44:33]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Gerry 04/04/07 08:49 PM
According to one of the paragraphs above, the Pentagon Budget of 1/2 TRILLION DOLLARS can be used to make sure the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are not disrupted. Aren't you tired of Bush's cries of wolf.
by geezersgal 04/04/07 08:29 AM
Not surprising but you didn't hear him complain when a group of republicans visited with Assad 4 days ago! Why isn't that included in the article?
by Sam 04/04/07 02:04 AM
The Bill to further fund the Iraq war was passed by Congress. Whether the troops receive the funding is up to Bush. If Bush veto's the Bill then it will be HIS actions that stop the additional funding of the troops not Congresses actions.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT