Sports
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Anglers can help reel in longlines
By Terry Tomalin
Published April 6, 2007
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Times photo: Martha Rial]
While recreational anglers have had to put up with bag limits and closures, longliners have been harvesting gag, left, and red grouper.
|
|
ST. PETERSBURG - Ask most offshore anglers what they most often fish for and they will probably reply "kingfish and grouper."
Anglers have been catching their share of king mackerel in recent weeks. We are right in the middle of the spring run. The fish swim south in the fall to winter in the Florida Keys, then run north to fatten up during the summer months in the waters off the Panhandle.
Kingfishing has been nothing short of spectacular this past decade. But that wasn't always the case. Large-scale commercial netting nearly wiped out the kingfish stocks and the baitfish they prey on.
But thanks to one forward-thinking angler, government officials stepped in to stop the slaughter. Now, thanks to local hero Gene Turner, the west coast of Florida enjoys one of the most vibrant recreational king mackerel fisheries in the United States.
Next to kingfish, the most popular offshore species is grouper. Most local anglers target red grouper and gag grouper (sometimes mistakenly called black grouper) in waters 20 to 50 miles offshore.
However, during the past two years, recreational anglers have watched as regulation after regulation has been passed limiting their access to these popular species. While sport fishermen endure emergency closures and bag limit reductions, they wonder why the federal government has not taken more drastic measures against what most of the "rec" sector considers the most destructive fishing practice in the Gulf of Mexico, bottom longlines.
For those of you who are unfamiliar with the practice, some commercial fishermen use miles of line and thousands of hooks to catch the bottom-dwelling grouper. Opponents of longlines believe the gear catches everything from sea turtles to sharks, in addition to millions of pounds of grouper.
Longlines are indiscriminate killers - they hook both small and large grouper - but the undersized fish don't stand a great chance of survival upon release. In fact, a common practice on many longline boats, according to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, is to use undersize fish as bait. The commercial fishermen call these undersized grouper "red mullet" or "maggots."
The state of Florida long ago banished longlines from its waters. But the federal government has been slow to act. The National Marine Fisheries Service, which is part of the Department of Commerce (which also oversees the Economic Development Administration and the International Trade Administration), has been criticized for favoring commercial interests.
The battle between the recreational and commercial sectors (with the NMFS waffling somewhere in between) has reached a boiling point. Federal officials are currently reviewing stock assessments for both red and gag grouper, after recreational interests, most notably the Pinellas County-based Fishing Rights Alliance, raised questions about the government's science.
The grouper issue will be discussed again in June when the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council holds its next regularly scheduled meeting. Not since the net ban has an issue so united the recreational fishing community. There's a petition circulating (www.gopetition.com/online/11535.html) urging federal officials to reconsider proposed rules that most anglers believe are based on voodoo science.
Meanwhile, the commercial community has been recirculating an industry buyout plan that would reduce, but not eliminate, the longline fleet. Any plan that stops short of banning bottom longlines in the gulf is doomed to failure.
An alternative plan, promoted by the FRA, would finance a buyout through a recreational grouper stamp. If 500,000 offshore anglers all bought a $10 grouper stamp the first year, $5-million could be raised to compensate the commercial fishermen for their losses.
Within five years, the longliners could be paid to convert to less effective, but less destructive, bandit gear. The writing is on the wall. Recreational fishermen are a tight-knit group, and many inshore anglers would support their offshore brothers and buy a grouper stamp, simply because it is the right thing to do.
But I am just a lowly outdoors editor whose opinion carries little weight in the halls of Congress. You, however, have the power of numbers. Go to http://thefra.org to learn more about this and other important issues. Let your voice be heard before it is too late.
Times Outdoors Editor Terry Tomalin can be reached at (727) 893-8808.
[Last modified April 5, 2007, 10:14:46]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Capt. Jack
|
06/02/07 08:56 AM
|
|
Terry - Good article however, need to publicize a phone number or email to contact in Tallahasse to voice public opinions.
Keep up the great work!!
Capt. Jack Satterfield
|
|
by brian
|
05/12/07 12:48 PM
|
|
With all the new regulations concerning (going green)and protecting natural resources.Why should we foot the bill for them to change now.They should allready have done it theirselves.instead of giving them charity to change,charge impact fees for not
|
|
by LEE
|
05/11/07 04:51 PM
|
|
Why is it that the masses are punished for the few? Rec fisherman can in no way catch the amount of fish or do the damage that commerical fishers do. Shrimpers drag the bottom, longliners kill the young and undersized, and the Rec fishers are screwed
|
|
by ed
|
05/01/07 07:38 PM
|
|
no wild population can withstand commercial harvest.commercial hunting had to go .asdoes longlines the solution is not tighter rec. regs the bag limit on red grouper was reduced by 80% now the data base was wrong but the limit stays and the problem
|
|
by Jim
|
04/27/07 04:33 PM
|
|
I am a conservative republican but i am all for banning long lines. If a $10 stamp will do it, great. We also need to enforce existing longline regulations
|
|
by Daniel
|
04/24/07 06:49 AM
|
|
I understand that commercial fishermen want to keep their jobs. What they fail to understand is that they're putting themselves out of business. America is the land of opportunity. Sell the boat and the gear, buy a computer, and trade stocks.
|
|
by Eric
|
04/16/07 01:08 PM
|
|
I think the idea is excellent, and is a step in the right direction. The devistation that occurs to the fish population is astounding. I have found myself reluctant to keep what "keeper grouper" I catch hoping my actions, and those I fish with help.
|
|
by Fred
|
04/13/07 05:39 PM
|
|
Please find and read this months national geograpic magazine.It is all about money hungry bluefin tuna fishing companies.Money hungry is the problem there and money hungry is the problem with the long line grouper fihermen.Just clean out the ocean .
|
|
by PIER RAT
|
04/12/07 07:38 AM
|
|
I'M AN AVID BOTTOM FISHERMAN AND SUPPORT THE STAMP AND AM AGAINST THE LONGLINES BUT LETS NOT FORGET THE RED TIDE KILLS.I SAW THOUSANDS OF DEAD 20 LB. GROUPER A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO FROM IT.
|
|
by James
|
04/11/07 08:22 PM
|
|
In texas where these long line boats come from. The rec fisherman is allowed to keep more red snapper than the commecial fisherman. The people who set on this board that makes recomendations to the feds,own these boats. Someone tell me I am wrong.
|
|
by John
|
04/11/07 04:26 PM
|
|
I occasionally take a party boat for grouper, and have done well at the Skyway pier. I support the stamp and would even if I didn't target grouper so my kids and their kids could.
|
|
by Greg
|
04/11/07 02:08 PM
|
|
Longliners should be stopped, however, I do not agree that to do so, there should be fishing stamps imposed on other fishing, for payment to the longliners.
Longliners were curtailed TX and the fishing there improved.
Why not FL also?
|
|
by chaz
|
04/11/07 12:38 PM
|
|
growing up in fla, ive seen frist hand as to what commerical fishin can do if unchecked its sad and a shame,,,money rules,,,,,,,well whats going to happen when the fishstocks are all gone???????
|
|
by Larry Chapman
|
04/11/07 10:40 AM
|
|
I don't target grouper or kings but I am very concerned with the health of our oceans and all things that live in them. Our fisheries must be protected, not just for recreation, but for the general health of our planet (our home).
|
|
by Stan
|
04/09/07 10:29 AM
|
|
I support a grouper stamp and do believe the bottom longlines are damaging the population.
|
|
by Joel
|
04/09/07 08:23 AM
|
|
Longlines are indiscriminant killers and
should not be allowed in Federal Waters. Will this continue until the recreational fisherman can not even take a single fish? What a waste of a
precious resource! It's time to even
the "playing field"!
|
|
by Ed
|
04/08/07 07:43 PM
|
|
I must agree, without a doubt! Look what happened when the net ban was passed!!! I have seen kingfish year round this past winter. The first time in years.
Florida is tourism, not commercial fishing. Oranges from Ca.?? and grouper from Mexico!
|
|
by Linda
|
04/08/07 05:28 PM
|
|
The community must support the rejuvination of our waters. Recently, when I was in Canada, I witnessed first hand the devastation of their fishlife from bottom trolling long liners. There is nothing left. Please continue to make the public aware.
|
|
by Al
|
04/07/07 05:59 PM
|
|
Outlaw the lonlinners, Use the MMFS council for bait. Save our fish. Cutting the limit on rec. fishermen cost the retail shops money. Gas tax, hotel and resurants. More money spent on rec, fishing than by commercial fishers.
|
|
by Troy
|
04/07/07 04:45 PM
|
|
I am sure glad that someone in the media is speaking up. There is a sustainable fishery in the Gulf of Mexico for small scale "individual" type commercial fishing. It is when we bring industry into resource that we have a problem. Commerce=no,resourc
|
|
by Capt.. George
|
04/07/07 08:44 AM
|
|
Terry I am 100% with you on this issue. I have a question, on the MMFS Council, are some of its members either represent or own commercial fish houses? Also why have the Federal Goverment allowed the dumping of contaminated water on our reefs.
|
|
by Bob
|
04/06/07 01:47 PM
|
|
Lowly outdoor writers and politicans seem to have a common tread, they can't
speak or write without a hint of a personal agenda.Conservation? No! Who gets the fish? Yes! Science for all-forget it. If we weren't all just so self-serving . Oh, well.
|