Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Shutters may no longer be optional
A bill would require homeowners to buy storm protection in order to get any type of building permit.
By TOM ZUCCO and JENNIFER LIBERTO
Published April 10, 2007
TALLAHASSEE - People who own homes along the coast valued at more than $300,000 may have to open their wallets a lot wider when they want to have a fence built, their roof repaired, or do any kind of work that requires a building permit. A bill passed out of the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee Monday proposes that starting Jan. 1 coastal homeowners who need a building permit for any reason must also buy hurricane shutters. And even if homeowners have no work planned, they may still have to shop for shutters. The bill also would require that those same coastal homes will not be eligible for coverage under state-backed Citizens Property Insurance unless they have shutters. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Bill Posey, R-Rockledge, said matching grants of up to $2,500 are available through the My Safe Florida Homes program, "and $2,500 should more than cover cost of shutters." But numbers provided by the Florida Alliance For Safe Homes FLASH, a nonprofit that promotes disaster preparedness, showed that $2,500 is about the average cost for only the cheapest protection - temporary panel shutters. Far less expensive plywood is not an acceptable protection under the My Safe Florida Homes program, said a program spokeswoman. The bill has at least one more committee stop before it reaches the Senate floor. It also lacks a companion bill in the House. Gov. Charlie Crist said he had not heard about the shutters requirement until Monday. "But it certainly sounds wise," he said. "It sounds like a smart thing to do." The Senate also unveiled in a separate bill Monday its own round of fixes to the special session legislative package, which included a few of the same fixes that have drawn criticism in the House. The bill removes some consumer protections for those businesses that purchase commercial property insurance. For example, the state's consumer advocate would lose the ability to review and give a grade to commercial property insurers. Also, the bill changes provisions that force companies to pay claims within 90 days of receiving them to apply only to residential policies, not commercial policies. When Sen. Ted Deutch, D-Delray Beach, questioned Posey about protections for small business owners, Posey said he'd be willing to work with him to include allowances for smaller businesses whose claims should not take a long time to process. But what drew most attention Monday was the proposal to tie the purchase of hurricane shutters to building permits and Citizens policies. During the special session, the Legislature had already strengthened building codes in the wind zones, requiring all new construction be built with protective coverings on every window and door. This bill would go even further, forcing more existing homes to meet the same requirements. Citizens, by far the largest property insurer in coastal areas, insures about 240,000 homeowners in the Tampa Bay area. The affected area includes nearly the entire Florida coast. In the Tampa Bay area, the region typically lies west of U.S. 19 in Pasco, Hernando and Citrus counties. The region does not include Hillsborough County, but does include all of Pinellas, home to about 104,000 Citizens policyholders. Shutters can cost anywhere from about $2,000 to more than $25,000, depending on the number of windows and type of protection. And forcing homeowners to buy them could present a financial burden for many. The counter-argument, Posey said, is that Florida insurance companies, including Citizens, paid about $36-billion in property damage claims after the eight hurricanes of 2004-05. That led to massive rate increases and policy cancellations, a problem lawmakers tried to address in January by allowing Citizens to compete with the private market, and insurance companies greater access to the state-backed reinsurance fund. But both measures also placed the state at far greater risk for losses should several major storms hit the state this year, and instead of premiums being lowered an average of 24 percent, the average savings are about 11 percent. "We have the perfect storm set up for the economic future of this state," Posey said during the meeting. "If the people of this state make a commitment to harden their property to the best of their abilities, hurricanes will not be a major threat and the hurricane crisis will be solved." "This is an issue of insurability," added Sen. Don Gaetz, R-Niceville. "It's a piece of legislation that will do more to reduce rates than anything we did in special session. "This calls for personal responsibility." House insurance expert Rep. Don Brown, R-De Funiak Springs, said he understood the idea of requiring homes insured by the state-run insurer to meet stronger building codes, because all insurance policyholders subsidize Citizens customers to some extent. Requiring Citizens policyholders to meet mitigation standards reduces the financial risk for all Floridians. However, he didn't fully understand the idea of forcing other homeowners to buy and put up storm shutters without first figuring out what other types of vulnerabilities they have. Brown says that's why he's a major proponent for home inspections to pinpoint the best way to strengthen homes. "If the roof is going to come off anyway, just saying, 'They must put shutters on,' is ... well, let's just say they need to rethink that," Brown said. Times staff writer Shannon Colavecchio-Van Sickler contributed to this report. Tom Zucco can be reached at zucco@sptimes.com or (727) 893-8247. What's next The bill has at least one more committee stop before it reaches the Senate floor. It also lacks a companion bill in the House.
[Last modified April 10, 2007, 00:46:23]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Caroline
|
03/07/08 01:39 AM
|
|
Inspector just cited me for no permit to put in my own windows and says will need to install hurricane shutters. Crazy! Not near water or trees. Am widow on set income.
|
|
by John
|
06/24/07 07:34 PM
|
|
I disagree with this story. $2,500.00 would not be enough to buy Hurricane shutters for a home. I work as a contractor an am working on homes in the French Quarter in New Orleans and Hurricane shutters ar selling for $800.00 to $1,200.00 a pair.
|
|
by Wendy
|
04/29/07 09:50 AM
|
|
It sounds like our legislators are voting on something once again without researching all the implications of this bill. They haven't addressed the prop tax issue,why just storm shutters and where is the research that shutters actually help?
|
|
by ENRICO
|
04/26/07 07:09 AM
|
|
I AM AN ARCHITECT AND A GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN FLORIDA. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH RIGOUROUS CODE CHANGES TO KEEP UP WITH INSURANCE CO. REQUESTS TO KEEP THEIR POCKETS LINED WHILE THEY CRY POVERTY. THE GOV'T SHOULD GIVE US GRANT $ TO AID IN THIS PURCHASE!SOS
|
|
by Barb
|
04/20/07 09:52 AM
|
|
Good Policy, except they should include all homes not just 300,000.00 or above
|
|
by Sharon
|
04/19/07 09:54 AM
|
|
I did storm damage assessment in '04&'05 & 98% of interior damage to homes was due to roof damage not windows!Why are ins.companies dictating bldg.code issues?Ins.,prop.taxes,gas,food etc.is skyrocketing/wages are stagnant!Let's clean house in Govt!!
|
|
by Marianne
|
04/12/07 07:56 AM
|
|
Total joke & incomplete solution! $2500 won't cover cost of shutters & insurers give biggest discounts for roof hardening. Installed HVHZ shutters on all 3 windows & doorwall of interior townhome for $3500. Citizens Ins reduced my premium by $100.
|
|
by Paul
|
04/11/07 03:58 PM
|
|
Rediculous!! What about the impact windows I bought??? Just as good as a shutter, not to mention energy savings! These lawmakers are absolutely absurd! More attacks against Florida cirizens. If they keep this up, they be no one living here!
|
|
by Jim
|
04/11/07 01:36 PM
|
|
Impact resistant windows should qualify for discounts because there protecting a home 24 hrs a day.Windows also help with energy consumption, shutters dont. Shutters only work if your there to put them up.And yes a window can break with shutters.
|
|
by Karen
|
04/11/07 09:04 AM
|
|
Why just shutters? What about impact resistant windows? If you have upgraded your windows you don't need shutters. How about reinforcing the roof? Shutters don't help if the roof flies off. Seems like another knee jerk reaction that will cost us.
|
|
by John
|
04/10/07 11:15 PM
|
|
I had the cheaper metal panels installed, that can be removed and put up in minutes, hundreds not thousands, and you can do it yourself, they sell the panels at Home Depot, etc. They WILL keep the roof on, keep the windows from blowing out.
|
|
by Todd
|
04/10/07 09:58 PM
|
|
Unlicensed contractors must be very excited. I don't suppose there is an exemption for the pensioner who's house over-appreciated and now they have this surprise waiting for them. Maybe they'll get a Save-Our-Windows exemption.
|
|
by Greg
|
04/10/07 07:48 PM
|
|
So let me get this straight. If i dont have shutters and my home gets roof damage, i have to spend the money to get shutters before i can buy my roof. So i have to put shutters before shelter of my children. Another bill to screw the citizens.
|
|
by Pete
|
04/10/07 06:52 PM
|
|
So, my 86 year old fixed income Aunt needs a permit to complete a $300 emergency roof repair and thanks to our government she has to spend $5000 on shutters first? Her roof will remain as leaky as Christ's concern for our elderly.
|
|
by kathy
|
04/10/07 06:43 PM
|
|
If someone has enough money to live on the beach, why should taxpayers foot the bill for their shutters? They should have them anyway.
|
|
by Pat
|
04/10/07 04:43 PM
|
|
This smacks of lobby effort on the part of the shutter business.And try finding a reputable company who can do this for you within the next couple of years-they're all booked! Or you can't get references.Is there a list somewhere of companies to use?
|
|
by Fred
|
04/10/07 04:34 PM
|
|
This is ludicrous! Anybody who thinks they can get decent shutters for $2500 has marbles in their head for brains. And how about if you already replaced your windows with hurricane impact windows ? Now you have to cover them up with shutters?
|
|
by Fred
|
04/10/07 04:03 PM
|
|
Cowardly legislators will make shutters mandatory but not take action to guarantee coverage. As useless as they have always been.
|
|
by Jeff
|
04/10/07 03:58 PM
|
|
Anyone know the stock symbols of shutter manufacturers? Looks like Sen. Bill Posey has some relatives in the business.
|
|
by Teresa
|
04/10/07 03:53 PM
|
|
Here we go again. My insurance company (not Citizen's) won't offer me a discount for any type of shutter that is not permanently installed. I live in a Historic district and design review doesn't allow for those type of shutters. Catch 22
|
|
by Cheryl
|
04/10/07 03:38 PM
|
|
I think its a good first step. Its not intended to hurricane proof a home, but reduces the damage. If you live in a high risk area, why would you expect other taxpayers to help pay for damages to your home? This bill should cover ALL coastal homes.
|
|
by Carol
|
04/10/07 03:23 PM
|
|
To Lisa - the answer to your question is simple - money. Not every one who lives on the coast can afford the hurricane shutters we very much want to buy because we're tapped out after paying taxes and insurance.
|
|
by Pat
|
04/10/07 03:23 PM
|
|
Lets talk about the massive profits made by insurance companies during 2004-05. Let me know where I can get superior storm shutter for that price.
|
|
by Jim Hale
|
04/10/07 03:18 PM
|
|
Bill Posey speaks and acts like a republican, and is working for the insurance co. not for the people he was elected to represent. He should resign. He is an enemy of the people.
|
|
by brian
|
04/10/07 03:13 PM
|
|
It is very good idea to install shutter. But are there any reasonable way of installlation , I mean costwise? Too much money it cost to poor people does not not help them at all.
|
|
by Pat
|
04/10/07 03:08 PM
|
|
This is yet another assault on the poor homeowners in Florida, as well as probably being unconstitutional! To shutter my entire home would cost well over $20,000.00 and I would still not be protected against flooding. It's a shutter lobyist's dream!
|
|
by Dick
|
04/10/07 03:04 PM
|
|
Besides being unnecessary and just plain stupid, the idea of mandating shutters is another example of government running amok. It will not achieve the objective. It will only increase everyone's cost and will not reduce insurance premiums.
|
|
by Amanda
|
04/10/07 02:48 PM
|
|
What if you have hurricane windows?
|
|
by Nancy
|
04/10/07 02:44 PM
|
|
Hurrican shutters are great, but to force homeowners to buy them is a bit much. We are all getting hit by higher insurance rates already. Enough is enough!
|
|
by kyle
|
04/10/07 02:41 PM
|
|
I need shutters on a house that won't be here if we have a cat 4 just so that I can put up a fence or get a new roof..... Let me open my shutter so they can look at my birds.
|
|
by CPK
|
04/10/07 02:29 PM
|
|
The legislators just dont get it ! How can you afford the shutters on your home if you cannot even afford your homeowners insuracne bill to pay, period ! Im all for having shutters if i know i could afford it, beyond my high insurance rates.
|
|
by Renee
|
04/10/07 02:21 PM
|
|
Where can I get shutters for $2,500?!
|
|
by GRIMMY
|
04/10/07 02:14 PM
|
|
WANA BET YOUR RATES DO NOT GO DOWN
|
|
by Claude
|
04/10/07 01:59 PM
|
|
Tests conducted by Miami-Dade have shown that at 120 miles/hour a 2 x 4 goes right thru hollow concrete blocks!
Next step huricane panels for the whole house? Watch shutter prices going up if this bill passes!
|
|
by GW
|
04/10/07 01:39 PM
|
|
If this "hardening" is of substantial benefit as purported, then why is the lower risk not reflected in the calculation (actuarial) for premiums ?
My house is hardened to the max & I submit to ins.co. soon. If it's "$100 time", I'll be upset too.
|
|