St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

As rebels yell, few listening

By DIANE ROBERTS Special to the Times
Published April 18, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

TALLAHASSEE - The young gents have put up a stockade, rough pine staves 10 feet high, all the way around the white-columned mansion on College Avenue. It's for Old South, the Kappa Alphas' annual sword-toting, belle-escorting, Battle Flag- waving party. They've got a couple of cannon in there, too.

In case the Yankees decide to reinvade the Southland.

Up the hill, in the Mary Brogan Museum's "AfroProvocations" exhibition, the Confederate battle flag has been given an extreme makeover, rendered in pink satin, sequins and feathers. Another one, entitled Bondage Flag, is in black leather and chains. A traditional version of the flag droops from a noose on a full-sized wooden gallows. The title of the piece by Sarasota-based artist John Sims is The Proper Way to Hang a Confederate Flag.

In case you thought the Old South past was dead - or even past.

Sims' work has unleashed the Furies of what has been called the "unfinished war." Robert Hurst, public relations director for the Florida Sons of Confederate Veterans, has called it an "abomination." The Sons demand that the Sims pieces be removed. The "Forget, Hell!" fraternity hollered all over the blogosphere. Anonymous callers threatened to come and tear the art show down.

The battle flag, in all its divisiveness, is still with us. Which is, of course, John Sims' point. At a fraught museum board meeting on March 26, Chucha Barber, executive director of the Brogan, was inclined to stroke the ruffled feathers of the SCV and their fellow travelers. In an op-ed piece for the Tallahassee Democrat she had promised to add "a most respectful history of the Confederate Flag" to the exhibit. Evidently there would be no mention of slavery, the klan or the flag's long afterlife as the banner of choice for racists from Coeur d'Alene to Cologne.

The Brogan board, to its credit, didn't think that was a good idea. One member, a former county school superintendent who'd had run-ins with the SCV, said, "You take one step back, you're going to get your tail whipped." Director of art exhibitions Cynthia Hollis, who had put "AfroProvocations" together, argued against trying to mollify "a group that first demands we remove work from the walls of the museum and then mounts a campaign of hate mail, hate e-mail and hate phone calls."

So the "AfroProvocations" show speaks for itself, unadulterated by any attempt to suck up to a bunch of ancestor worshipers. You could argue that Confederate apologists are at a considerable advantage anyway. One of Florida's more embarrassing statutes (256.10 if you want to look it up), still on the books, prohibits the "mutilation, defacing, and defiling" of any Confederate flag. It's also unlawful to "cast contempt upon the flags of the Confederacy."

Yet contempt is precisely what should be cast upon the battle flag. The SCV and other neo-Confeds claim they're all about "Heritage, Not Hate." But the flag's heritage is hatred - hatred, violence, injustice. It's an irredeemable symbol; it cannot be rehabilitated. However brave individual Confederates may have been, however noble they believed their cause to be, their society was predicated on the barbaric institution of slavery.

Nonetheless, the SCV is lobbying the Legislature for a Confederate flag license plate. So far, the bill is going nowhere. And despite fears that legislators might use the "AfroProvocations" show as an excuse to cut funding for museums, according to Malinda Horton, with the Florida Association of Museums, there haven't even been rumblings of outrage.

The battle flag will never completely go away: the Kappa Alphas have to fly something over their fort. But this year, 2007, the 200th anniversary of the birth of Robert E. Lee, maybe all Southerners should take to heart what Lee told his die-hard Confederate officers: "Abandon your animosities and make your sons Americans."

Diane Roberts, a former Times editorial writer, teaches English and writing at Florida State University.

[Last modified April 17, 2007, 21:28:12]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Arthur 05/01/07 08:54 PM
Looking back, I would say our founding fathers were traitors two. What gave them the right to take up arms. If you judge them by the same standards for being a traitor during the Civil War the would be, but Hey, winners write the history books.
by Arthur 05/01/07 08:33 PM
The hate organizations who use these flags should come up with there own "original" design, and leave these flags alone. Would everyone be up in arms If they were using a Pirate flag? Would everyone find this flag now "Offensive" ?
by Ed 04/29/07 09:53 PM
I disagree with Ms Roberts and am proud of my southern heritage and the flag allows me the right to honor my dead ancestors that fought for their state of Alabama rights and never,from my research, ever owned slaves and were all good Christian men.
by Wayne 04/29/07 12:33 PM
THE BATTLE FLAG IS NOT THE SLAVE FLAG THE BONNEY BLUE IS, WHITE STAR BLUE BACKGROUND NO STRIPES
by Jonathan 04/28/07 06:42 AM
Diane: The flag used to import africans into this country for slavery was the stars and stripes!! The battle flag had nothing to do with it! If you want to confront the evils of slavery, look at the Middle East and Africa. Check facts first!
by Jerry 04/27/07 11:35 AM
To Diane Roberts Regarding your hatred for all things Confederate I say you are totally full of BULL. I am a proud Sourtherner and well read on the War of Northern Aggression. To hell with you! Long may it wave & Kiss My Grits!! Jerry W. Harbin
by Richard 04/27/07 10:45 AM
The battle flag only represents the Army of Northern Virginia. During the war, there were many flags carried into battle by the south, including the Virginia State Flag, whose motto is "sic siemper tyrannis." Should these flags be replaced as well?
by jack 04/27/07 03:14 AM
Ms. Roberts, perhaps you forget that those Southrons in the 1860s and their descendents today ARE Americans. Abandoning ancient animosities does not mean one must forget one's past, despise one's ancestry or cease to mourn one's dead country.
by Vaughn 04/26/07 06:50 PM
What is considered barbaric today was a way of life for thousands of years, and it still is today in many parts of the world. Why not treat the Stars and Stripes the same way? It flew over many slave ships for 200 years, but near a Confederate flag.
by Too Tall in Texas 04/24/07 01:13 AM
Lady, how dare you suggest that my uncles and father who fought & died for the USA in WWII (and who also honored and respected their own Confederate fathers) aren't "Americans". Talk about prejudice! Get thee to a therapist.
by Charles 04/23/07 07:01 AM
This is the same old story of half-truths against the descendents of Confederate soldiers. My ancestors did not own slaves. They were hard working farmers fighting an invasion of their state by northern soldiers. The State of NC was their country.
by John 04/20/07 02:02 PM
For those of you that think that there are no people of color that wave the Confederate flag - go to http://www.thesouthernamerican.org/colour.html and check it out. There are black members in the SCV and the UDC. It pays to do a little research.
by Clint 04/20/07 10:27 AM
It is historically ignorant teachers like you that's the reason I took my daughter out of the federal indoctrination centers you call the school system in lieu of home schooling.
by WildBill 04/19/07 12:19 PM
"Heritage not Hate" simply means we don't hate anyone because of their ethnicity. It doesn't apply to whining, self-righteous, guilt-slinging hypocrites like you. And if it serves to "divide" people like us from people like you, so much the better.
by Henry 04/19/07 02:21 AM
Ms Roberts. "The first law of the historian is that he shall never utter an untruth. The second is that he shall suppress nothing that is true. Moreover, there shall be no suspicion of partiality in his writing, or of malice." - Cicero (106-43 BC)
by Spence 04/18/07 10:30 PM
Linclon's first inaugural address:"There needs be no bloodshed,violence, if the feds can hold, occupy and collect the duties and imposts, no invasion, no use of force against the people anywhere". Wow! Sure sounds like give me your money or ELSE!!
by alan 04/18/07 08:26 PM
Say what you want to say, the southern states left the union to maintain their way of living. What about the racism and Jim Crow laws that were enacted after the war? Lee and the rest of the Confederate army were traitors and deserved to be hanged.
by Clint 04/18/07 07:22 PM
Diane, who gave you the power to decide who and how someone should honor their ancestors? Would you dare tell black people, Mexicans, Muslims, gays, women and others tht they should be ashamed of their heritage as you believe Southerners should?
by Terry 04/18/07 07:02 PM
I hope this woman doesn't teach English and Writing with the lack of knowledge that she brings to Southern Heritage and History.
by Pam 04/18/07 06:04 PM
You've got it wrong..... there aren't "just a few" listening. There are more than you could ever imagine. The decision to denounce anything Confederate or Southern only strengthens our reslove to increase our numbers. See ya at the polls!
by Jeff 04/18/07 05:36 PM
The controversial battle flag was not the original flag. The original looked too much like the US flag and in order to keep units on both sides from shooting their comrades it was changed. I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct.
by Zeek 04/18/07 05:36 PM
Thank God Ms Roberts is not a history teacher
by Jeff 04/18/07 05:34 PM
Ms. Roberts needs to research history before writing her article. Only 3% of southerners owned slaves, it was the emotional issue for the war. The majority of confederate soldiers fought for states rights and because the north invaded their homes.
by Terry 04/18/07 05:27 PM
You perpetually offended people need to get a life! The battle flag is a beautiful symbol of resistance to tyranny. What anyone else has SAID it means doesn't change the facts. It will ALWAYS fly over the South.You can believe that! Yankee go home!!!
by Don 04/18/07 03:27 PM
Racist groups find the American flag popular, also. I am a proud American-and I am a proud decscendant of confederate soldiers. Honoring the confederate flag does NOT make me less of an American. Animosity is destroying the heritage of others.
by Barbara 04/18/07 03:15 PM
If it's really about heritage, then why don't we see any southern blacks displaying the flag? Because it's really about racism and hate!
by Steve 04/18/07 02:59 PM
Jim- Lee was a traitor? That is spin! No Confederate was ever convicted of treason.Read about the non-trial of Jeff Davis.YOU brush up. Alex-The SCV did indeed go after the KKK about the flag back in the 70's I believe. Courts ruled for KKK. 1st amm
by Curt 04/18/07 02:47 PM
Hint, the hate groups that misuse the Confederate flag also misuse the US flag. The media needs to get off their soap box and make a better effort to distinguish true heritage groups and hate groups and not lump them all to gether.
by Harry 04/18/07 02:45 PM
If the Confederate Flag suffers a past of hatred, injustice and violence, then so too does Old Glory....where is the outrage there?
by Charles 04/18/07 02:41 PM
Lee may have said "abandon your animosities...", but I am sure he would be turning over in his grave at the onslaught of the media to villify the banner that his soldiers so valiantly fought under.
by Donna 04/18/07 02:35 PM
The winners of wars write history.If Geronimo had won the war,The history books would have told completly different story!People are only biginning to understand that we have been lied to by the northern goverment.
by Allen 04/18/07 02:30 PM
Yankee Lies! The states that broke away from the union knew all to well the war was not just about slavery.It was about northern aggresion! Unfair taxation, embargos, and goverment interference.Sound Familiar?The same reasons we broke from England!
by Chris 04/18/07 02:15 PM
I invite everyone who believes this trash to read:"A Southern View of the Invasion of the Southern States" by Captain S. A. Ashe.The book was published in 1911 and contains facts about the war that are backed by historical documents.Demand the truth!
by Keith 04/18/07 02:08 PM
It is a shame that public funds are being used to pay a person who holds such skewed, revisionist attitude. Ms. Roberts, I hope your little liberal heart feels better after writing such drivel. My ancestors fought an invading army, not for slavery.
by Jim 04/18/07 01:37 PM
Remember, Robert E Lee was a traitor. The war was about slavery. No amount of spin can stop that. The confederacy was created to defend slavery which make it much different from the USA. Brush up on th history of slavery, the US and the Civil war
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT