Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Columns
Rowden passes the buck to the People
By JEFF WEBB
Published April 19, 2007
Diane Rowden's name won't appear on the ballot for re-election until 2008. But the outcome may have been decided Tuesday. It's too early to tell if she won or lost, but it is fair to speculate that her unexpected - and transparent - actions Tuesday either will cost her votes, or pick up enough to return her to a third four-year term on the Hernando County Commission. I refer to the commission's 3-2 vote not to adopt a proposed ordinance that would have abolished the Spring Hill Fire Rescue Commission, and made the County Commission the sole governing authority over the fire district. Commissioners David Russell Jr., whose idea it was, and Chris Kingsley voted for it; Commissioners Jeff Stabins, Rose Rocco and Rowden voted against it. Then on Tuesday, before there was a word of debate on the merit of the proposed ordinance, before a peep was heard from the gaggle of lawyers nesting in front of the dais, and before the first impassioned plea from anyone in the audience, Rowden tried to pull the plug on the public hearing. Cancel it and replace it with a motion to let the People decide the fate of the fire commission, she cried. The People cheered, just as Rowden knew they would. She is, after all, a People Person. She couldn't get any support for her idea, and the public hearing went on as scheduled. But at that point it didn't matter that her motion had failed; she already had seized the opportunity to be a crowd pleaser. It is not exactly surprising that Rowden, who is somewhat of a professional populist, played to the crowd. It is surprising, however, that her sudden desire to let people govern themselves was a flip-flop from a week earlier, when she was squarely behind Russell's proposed ordinance. "It's the right thing to do," she told me then. Of course, she wasn't staring into the eyes of a couple of hundred angry constituents when she made that principled statement. As Rowden retreated Tuesday from her previous stance, she left the door open for Rocco to tiptoe through after she, too, took the easy way out by relinquishing her responsibility to voters. I can write off Rocco's decision as a rookie mistake. She hasn't had too many occasions yet to be put on the spot, and she certainly has not faced a group that rowdy and thirsty for politicians' blood. But Rowden has sat in the hot seat so may times she's left an indelible imprint. There is no doubt she knew what she was doing, why she was doing it and how it would affect others, including Kingsley. He also is up for re-election, but he had the courage to vote his conviction that this ordinance was in the best interest of Spring Hill residents. But I wonder if Rowden is as sure about how this might affect her. Sure, she picked a few hundred, maybe even a 1,000, quick votes with her expedient flip-flop Tuesday. But what about the more than 60,000 Spring Hill voters who weren't at the meeting? They are the ones who don't really give a hoot whether the fire commission or the County Commission runs things, as long as the ambulance or firetruck shows up when they need it. And what about the other 60,000 voters elsewhere in the county who didn't have a dog in this hunt, but who watched the chase from the porch? Rowden may run into a disapproving backlash there. "What can I say? I changed my mind," she said Wednesday. She did so the day before the public hearing, she said. It is fair to say this matter was handled clumsily. The county came off as hamfisted and haughty, and inadvertently made martyrs of the fire commission. It probably would have made more sense for the commission to wait until later this year when it had the final report from the consultant who is examining fire service for the whole county. Maybe the commission should have put it to a referendum in the first place and skipped this intermediate step of trying to kick the fire commission to the curb. There is room for reasoned disagreement on those topics. Sadly, there was precious little discussion among board members or the audience about the merits of the ordinance. Instead, it turned into a pep rally, and a debate about the merits of a referendum. Now we wait and see what the rest of the People have to say about independence for the fire district, as well as Rowden's bald-faced about-face. In the meantime, the fire district should enjoy doing as it pleases because Tuesday's vote reduced the County Commission to the role of a babysitter - except not that powerful. Jeff Webb can be reached at webb@sptimes.com or 352 754-6123.
[Last modified April 19, 2007, 08:00:54]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Ann Marie
|
04/24/07 07:41 AM
|
|
Agree with you,Jeff on this one, what do we need her for if we have to do her job.Russell tried to tell the people it is costing taxpayers more money to have the fire board and we can get the same bang for our buck without them.
|
|
by Joe
|
04/20/07 04:22 PM
|
|
I'm with you Cheryl. All of the County people were in on this scam. We need accountability on some county officials who stirred up this mess. Who wrote the 'laundry list'. That's what I want to know.
|
|
by Cheryl
|
04/19/07 06:06 PM
|
|
shown up to the commissioners meeting. The only negative comments I've heard...are from the papers...or spineless people...who write their comments into the papers. Wah, wah. Sour grapes. Show up next time. The only thing that was accomplished..
|
|
by Cheryl
|
04/19/07 06:04 PM
|
|
is giving the vote back to the people...where it should be...what is wrong with that??? Do you want these commissioners making all your decisions??? I certainly don't. Think about it!!!!
|
|
by Cheryl
|
04/19/07 06:01 PM
|
|
I think Diane Rowden should be commended. She doesn't owe her allegance to her fellow commissioners. She owes it to her voters that she represents. And they were speaking loud and clear. If people were for the ordinance...they should have...
|
|
by jim
|
04/19/07 03:32 PM
|
|
Rowden is a back stabber. It is not the first time. Time to get rid of her.
|
|
by Gary
|
04/19/07 01:11 PM
|
|
Typical politics. Why do you think these politicians spend so much time ( and money ) trying to accumulate votes prior to elections in the first place? Then, all they do is squabble and jockey for position after wards.
|
|
by Cheryl
|
04/19/07 11:30 AM
|
|
60,000 who don't give a hoot?? It's more like 60,000 who are misinformed, uninformed, or who may possibly have a JOB and cannot attend the meeting. All of your columns on this matter have been misleading and presumptuous. You shame your profession
|
|