St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Reckless gun bill defeated

By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published April 20, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

A reckless progun bill was defeated in the Florida House on Wednesday despite arguments that a vote was inappropriate just two days after the Virginia Tech tragedy. Rep. Baxter Troutman, R-Winter Haven, had hoped to delay debate, saying the subject matter was "highly inappropriate" considering media coverage of the massacre, in which a disturbed student named Cho Seung-Hui murdered 32 classmates and faculty members. The bill, which would have denied employers the right to ban guns from cars in company parking lots, was rejected by a key House committee and is likely gone for this session.

It was one of the more lucid moments in Tallahassee, where lawmakers can wind up casting votes based more on the influence of lobbyists than real-world realities. Any action that slows the proliferation of deadly weapons in inappropriate settings has to be seen as respectful of the Virginia Tech victims. Some lawmakers who opposed the bill said they were motivated by the property-rights issue rather than recent events. Gov. Charlie Crist, however, put the matter in proper context: "How can you not be impacted at least on some level by as horrific a tragedy as that was in our country?"

While defeat of this legislation may not prevent the next workplace or school shooting, it certainly takes a stand against the ubiquity of guns with increasingly deadly firepower in our communities. That is why some of the most respected businesses in the state opposed the bill.

"It's a matter of safety from our standpoint," said Derek Bruce, a lobbyist for Walt Disney World, which prohibits employees from bringing firearms onto park property. "We want to have a safe workplace and a safe place for people to come and visit."

No doubt the NRA will bring the bill back next year. No doubt NRA lobbyist Marion Hammer will continue to make such ridiculous assertions as, "This bill is about staying alive to get to work and staying alive to get home from work." Floridians don't need to carry guns to get to and from work safely. And whether the next debate is over property rights, protecting the next innocent victims or standing up to the bullying gun lobby, all will be sufficient justification for continuing to oppose this bad bill.

[Last modified April 20, 2007, 01:04:42]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Harold 04/20/07 11:19 PM
Employers should be required to post large signs stating that "This Is A Gun Free Zone" like I'm sure they have in front of their homes, so bad guys will know they can't take guns in there.
by Dan 04/20/07 05:27 PM
JKG, maybe not in their cars, but if the students w/ concealed weapons permits were allowed to carry a gun on their person, at least they would have had a fighting chance.
by Max 04/20/07 04:48 PM
John; Who died and left you God?
by JKG 04/20/07 01:33 PM
Right Paul, because if all those dead students had had a chance to run out to thier locked cars, in a remote parking lot, all that carnage would have been avoided! >:\
by John 04/20/07 01:25 PM
My company, my property, my rules. You don't like it? You have the RIGHT to quit and seek employment elsewhere. Otherwise enjoy the above average pay, medical benefits, and child care I (as an evil "corporation") provide, and leave your gun home.
by paul 04/20/07 11:41 AM
va. tech had a rule banning law-abiding students from bringing guns onto its campus. look how much that discouraged the shooter. congrats editors, you're 1 for 3 on gun votes and now use this space to gloat, but like jim said, this isn't over.
by Kitty 04/20/07 11:11 AM
Jane, nobody is having an abortion on their employer's property, and bibles aren't designed solely to kill people. However, employers already tell people how to behave in their off-hours in the form of drug testing, and hiring only non-smokers.
by Kay 04/20/07 09:49 AM
The chisel is out and the rock is being chipped away.
by Jon 04/20/07 09:46 AM
While the bible is a major cause of senseless violence, unless you beat someone to death with it, it really isn't much of a deadly weapon. Where as, you can kill 10 people in about 30 seconds with one clip. Don't give into fear, leave the gun at home
by Wade 04/20/07 09:24 AM
Companies have property rights. But are they going to search the cars of their employees? What is to stop a person from keeping a gun in the car a being quiet about it? If companies start searching cars, I think that will be over the top.
by Rob 04/20/07 09:19 AM
Tell the woman who has a restraining order against a violent/threatening ex that she is more safe unarmed to and from work.
by Joe 04/20/07 09:00 AM
The fact that guns were not allowed on campus certainly didn't stop Cho form doing what he did.
by Jane 04/20/07 08:39 AM
Should a business be allowed to forbid its employees from having an abortion or keeping a Bible locked in their cars on company propterty? It really is a "rights" issue.
by Carl T. Hahn 04/20/07 07:18 AM
It's about time politicians think for themselves, if that is possible, and throw the lobbyists out. How many people that hkave a weapon actually know how to use them and when.
by jim 04/20/07 06:21 AM
"A LUCID MOMENT?" No matter where one stands on this issue, it is remarkable to refer to this emotion-charged environment as producing a lucid state of mind. This isn't over.
by Tom 04/20/07 05:32 AM
It's nother victory for unreasoning fear and media-driven hysteria. Corporate bullying of employees will not stop the next massacre. And as we have seen at Virg Tech, Colombine and others, law enforcement is of little help as well.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT