Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Stanton told to return files
Largo says information was erased from his city laptop before he turned it in.
By LORRI HELFAND
Published April 20, 2007
LARGO -- Files were apparently removed from former City Manager Steve Stanton's city-issued laptop computer before he returned it last month, Largo officials say. A computer forensic expert hired by Largo said it appears a "significant number of files" on the laptop's hard drive were "destroyed, removed or altered," according to an April 12 letter from an attorney for the city to Stanton's lawyer. That has set Stanton at odds with the city, with Stanton's attorney saying he's done nothing wrong. But Largo officials said they believe some of the documents removed may include public records. Florida law prohibits public officials from destroying records except in specified circumstances. "The city is considering its rights with regard to potential civil legal remedies for the destruction or conversion of public documents and for spoliation of evidence," wrote attorney Kevin Johnson, whose firm represents Largo on labor matters. Apparently at least two portable storage devices, or USB drives, were used to store documents from Stanton's laptop, Johnson wrote. As a result, the city has demanded that Stanton produce any portable data storage devices that were used to store missing data so the city can retrieve public records. Stanton has said little publicly about the records. Early this week, he acknowledged using a Memory Stick with the laptop. Without being specific, he said that people were "yelling" at him about it and his attorney said he should not discuss the issue with the Times. He said he wanted to avoid litigation and might "wind up going to court" over this issue. He did not return later calls from the Times. Stanton's attorney said he is working with the city. She blamed the Times, which has requested records from the laptop, for exaggerating a nonissue. "There's nothing missing; there's nothing removed," said Karen Doering, senior counsel for the National Center for Lesbian Rights. "The city was fully aware he was going to take his personal items off the computer before he returned it. You all are the only ones creating an issue here where there really isn't one." The Largo City Commission fired Stanton, 48, on March 23, about a month after he disclosed that he planned to become a woman named Susan. Since then, Stanton has said he hopes to educate others about transgender people. He appeared on Larry King Live last week and the Daily Show with Jon Stewart Tuesday night. He also has applied for a job as Sarasota's city manager. As Largo's city manager, Stanton had a reputation for making public information accessible. He also was known for keeping close tabs on information coming into and out of City Hall. Last year, for example, a city employee was asked to resign after Stanton discovered that the man had improperly contributed $100 to the former mayor's re-election campaign. Stanton learned about the contribution after a sealed envelope labeled "Personal" had been delivered to the employee at City Hall. In contrast, the fate of Stanton's laptop has been a source of disagreement. A day before he was fired, Stanton's attorney told the city that since it had refused his offer to buy his city laptop, the computer would be returned "with a new hard drive." That's not acceptable, Johnson responded. Stanton was well aware that employees cannot expect any materials placed on a city computer to be private, he added. "City computer equipment must be used for city business only," Johnson wrote. "Thus, any documents contained on Mr. Stanton's computer cannot be considered 'private' or 'confidential.'" Harold Schomaker, the city's information technology manager, said employees are informed during orientation not to expect privacy with e-mails or Internet use. They're also told city devices are not meant for personal use, he said. Johnson also requested that no one "inspect, modify, copy, alter, damage, or even turn on the computer" until it was returned. The laptop was delivered to City Hall on March 23 and was stored in the Police Department's property room until it was inspected by E-Hounds, a Clearwater firm that specializes in computer forensics. City Attorney Alan Zimmet said "Steve says nothing he deleted and saved to the USB drive has anything to do with city business." The city wants to review the documents to make sure of that, Zimmet said. Experts can clearly detect when files have been deleted, said Susanne Nicholson, an expert certified through the International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners. "Computer evidence is easy to work with," said Nicholson, whose business, Midwest Forensics, is in Hillsdale, Ill. "Either the evidence is there or it isn't. It is very exact." Zimmet said he did not know how much information was missing, but Commissioner Andy Guyette, a technical director at Honeywell, said a lot of information can be stored on a flash drive. "You can get them with one gigabyte," he said. "You could probably get a very large book in one gigabyte." Stanton is writing a book about his life, and Guyette said he thinks Stanton may have done the work on his laptop. Guyette said he doesn't care about that, but is concerned there may be information missing from the laptop about Stanton's communication with his circle of confidants at City Hall. "That is a city computer," he said. "It is a public record. It should not have been tampered with." Lorri Helfand can be reached at (727) 445-4155 or lorri@sptimes.com.
[Last modified April 19, 2007, 23:49:16]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Lyssa
|
09/24/07 11:31 PM
|
|
Wait till the city crucifies her for leaving doughnut crumbs in her chair...next year it'll be that paperclip that she forgot to return.
It's your money, Largo
|
|
by Emma,
|
04/21/07 10:19 AM
|
|
I suspect if the city fired everyone that did something personal on a city owned computer, there would be no one left. Personal includes, reading the news, reading jokes that have been sent to you, and posting comments to this article.
|
|
by Drew
|
04/20/07 09:31 PM
|
|
Okay Largo - give it a rest already. Let Steve/Susan go quietly away an wish he would take Mayor Pat with him/her. Maybe the computer had the codes for the dimensions of garages in it, Lord knows they need that in Largo !!!
|
|
by T
|
04/20/07 09:24 PM
|
|
The city is trying to justify it's action by discrediting a person who faithfully served for 14 years. I used to live in Largo, I'm glad I no longer do.
|
|
by JS
|
04/20/07 09:23 PM
|
|
Okay, majority of people agree that he was fired because of gender issues. It's quite obvious the city is looking for a 'cover their butts' in case of lawsuit. All they are accomplishing is looking like the discriminatory fools wasting tax $.
|
|
by john
|
04/20/07 08:53 PM
|
|
well, this isnt the first time a newsreporter has made much to do about nothing. How about we focus on BUSH and less on Stanton. COME ON!
|
|
by Gilbert
|
04/20/07 08:34 PM
|
|
He was afforded the opportunity to get his job back, he lost. Now he steals public records, and continues to cause problems. What an amazing individual, simply amazing! If a person is patient, you can see the good vs bad in an individual. Hint, hint!
|
|
by Al
|
04/20/07 07:48 PM
|
|
How stupid can the city be to let him remove city property after he was terminated! They need a security upgrade!!!!!!
|
|
by Ann
|
04/20/07 06:20 PM
|
|
What docs does the city believe he deleted? Drafts of letters or meeting notes? His email address book? Old emails? Temporary Internet files? If the city isn't naming what type of alleged files then it needs to stop trying to hinder his job opp's.
|
|
by Andy
|
04/20/07 05:31 PM
|
|
The lawsuit against Largo is going to awesome for the taxpayers.
|
|
by Scott
|
04/20/07 05:29 PM
|
|
The City had a right to gain knowledge of what is on its own computers but the accusation Stanton is guilty of destruction of public records is vindictive. The labor attorneys know that's a lie. So do others in the administration.
|
|
by Rob
|
04/20/07 05:27 PM
|
|
It wasn't Steve that was using the computer for personal resons, that was Susan!
|
|
by Scott
|
04/20/07 05:26 PM
|
|
This is NOT about destruction of public records or evidence. Evidence of what? He isn't suing. This is a vendetta and a poor excuse for more billable hours.
|
|
by Scott
|
04/20/07 05:25 PM
|
|
The City labor attorney is wrong in the assumption that public records have been destroyed. There are surely copies to everything. No public records have been destroyed. The labor attorneys need to chill and stop the baseless accusations.
|
|
by Scott
|
04/20/07 05:21 PM
|
|
If Stanton's files were a "work in progress" they are not considered public records. Only after being made for consumption (transmitted to another person) would any files become public record.
|
|
by Terri
|
04/20/07 04:45 PM
|
|
It seems that the county is more concerned with finding out who Stanton's confidants were. Okay Largo, move on. Stop wasting the tax payers money.
|
|
by Kay
|
04/20/07 04:37 PM
|
|
How many people commenting below are doing so on company computers? This I.T. forensics guy can access deleted files. Why do they even care what was on his pc? Leave him alone.
|
|
by Told You So
|
04/20/07 04:28 PM
|
|
Lets hear from all the freaks who supported him before the hearing to fire him/This proves that sexual preference had nothing to do with it. He broke the very rules that he enforced upon fellow employees. It won't be long before he moves. Good Bye !
|
|
by Dallas
|
04/20/07 03:31 PM
|
|
Stanton should educate us about what resides on a transgendered person's company computer. Stanton clearly had data on the computer that would be detrimental to his situation in the public eye. This is another reason Largo can no longer trust him.
|
|
by TJ
|
04/20/07 03:20 PM
|
|
If the shoe was on the other foot Stanton would have fired whomever it was that did that, what a hypocrite. He can try to hide his dirty secrets but the truth will come out eventually. Hats off to Largo for firing the weasel.
|
|
by JJ
|
04/20/07 02:34 PM
|
|
Attention taxpayers...How do you feel now that you know Largo is hiring computer forensic experts to serve to get even with Stanton. Or even more, the litigation costs surrounding this whole mess. It's your money thier wasting. What a joke this is.
|
|
by JJ
|
04/20/07 02:31 PM
|
|
They should put this on the Jerry Springer show. Nasty politics at it's finest.
|
|
by spud
|
04/20/07 01:47 PM
|
|
The City of Largo has lost it! What are they afraid of? Leave Stanton alone clowns: Glad I do live in that redneck city.
|
|
by Brian
|
04/20/07 01:17 PM
|
|
This is what will make Stanton Decide to go after largo for discrimination Way to go the lawyers win again. You know that there are allot of fights out there so choose wisely.
|
|
by John
|
04/20/07 01:00 PM
|
|
Stanton's management history indicates he would have held an employee's feet to the fire if they swapped hard drives or used city computers for personal business as he clearly did. Why does he think the rules don't apply to him?
|
|
by Cindy
|
04/20/07 12:23 PM
|
|
There's nothing to be gained by the further embarrasement and humiliation of Stanton. Come on folks, let this thing go. Largo and the Times have more important things to concern themselves with. Move on.
|
|
by Winstone
|
04/20/07 11:52 AM
|
|
As an elder attorney, I opine that the statements by the city attorney fairly represent the state of the law. However, a cost/benefit analysis seems to dictate that it would be more beneficial for the city attorney to leave Mr. Stanton alone.
|
|
by David
|
04/20/07 11:27 AM
|
|
If you investigated this further you would find Stanton has fired several Largo employees for this - personal use of city equipment. This is just another example of his hypocrisy and double standards.
|
|
by Mel
|
04/20/07 11:14 AM
|
|
Stanton should be allowed to violate City rules and use the laptop for personal use. After all he is Transgender and protected rules don't apply.
|
|
by Paul
|
04/20/07 11:07 AM
|
|
Stanton is a proven liar. This just confirms a previously proven fact. He was not fired over his sexual preference - he is a crook and a LIAR. Where are all of his supporters now ? Why didn't he sue the city-because he knew what would be exposed !
|
|
by Elisabeth
|
04/20/07 10:51 AM
|
|
Seriously, leave the guy alone. I mean who hasn't had personal files on their work laptop that they deleted when they quit. Why are they trying to pick a fight??? He's not even suing them!
|
|
by TryHarder
|
04/20/07 10:48 AM
|
|
Those files can be retrieved. Even a Gutmann wipe (35 passes can be retrieved). Check slack space! True data destruction can only be achieved using a sledge hammer (in the right place). Now, if the files were encrypted then wiped, another story.
|
|
by JD
|
04/20/07 10:36 AM
|
|
Why did they not take his computer the day he was sent packing. The computer and any files on it belong the city and not him.
He had not rights to them when he placed them on hte computer.
|
|
by Harry
|
04/20/07 10:18 AM
|
|
I worked in govt. for 25 years and yes, your work laptop is taxpayer property. Everything on it is public. He is violation of our Sunshine laws. Good riddance. This shows his character.
|
|
by rebekah
|
04/20/07 09:33 AM
|
|
they should be happy he's not suing them and move on...
|
|