St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Hard choices on Pinellas jail crowding

By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published April 25, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

Pinellas County Sheriff Jim Coats didn't pin a star to his lapel with the intention of letting inmates out of jail. Yet he has found that to be the responsible approach to dangerous overcrowding at the county jail.

Coats was finally able to convince Pinellas-Pasco Chief Judge David Demers that the Sheriff's Office needs more authority to relieve pressure on an overburdened jail facility and staff. On Monday, the jail population was 3,573, well over the jail's intended capacity. More than 400 inmates are sleeping on the floor in overcrowded cells, increasing the chances of violence, disease and lawsuits.

Now Coats will be allowed to release some suspects at booking, but only if they are charged with minor offenses and pass a background check. His office will also be allowed to release some sentenced inmates early, but only under strict rules and if jail conditions warrant it. Coats is also planning to expand his electronic monitoring program, in which nonviolent inmates are released wearing an ankle bracelet that allows his office to follow their movements.

It took guts for Coats to push the issue to the front. He knows he will be criticized if someone released by his office commits another crime. Yet he faced up to his duty to protect the public, his employees and inmates in his care, most of whom have yet to be convicted of a crime.

"I'm already in a high-risk business," Coats said. "I'm willing to accept that responsibility considering what might happen if we don't relieve the overcrowding."

Even with his new authority, Coats will be able to address only a portion of the problem. He'll need help from the entire law enforcement and judicial community, and from county government to provide a long-term solution.

Judges will need to keep hearing dates and trials from backing up, city police will need to make fewer arrests for minor ordinance violations and the County Commission will have to push forward with jail construction. One facility that would add immediate relief is a new 400-bed medical wing, whose completion date inexplicably keeps getting delayed.

Ultimately, Pinellas taxpayers will foot the bill for more cells or unsafe jail conditions. Considering that it costs more than $80 a day to incarcerate an inmate, the alternatives Coats proposes are a deal. He deserves praise and public support for his effort.

[Last modified April 24, 2007, 21:43:15]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by ed 04/25/07 08:59 PM
Milton,? Tonee, wrong and quit playing the race card. Scott, wrong. County pays not state. A riot would cost the taxpayers Million$ not to mention lives. JT, I agree spend more on educ/keep people out of the system. Rehabiltation does not exist.
by tonee 04/25/07 02:00 PM
just like yesteryear...the more things change...the more they revert back or stay the same in some form, shape, or fashion...locking up individuals especally if they are black,hispanic,or poor is a form of control ....slavery in the 21St century!
by milton 04/25/07 01:37 PM
if you are black, poor, uneducated, hispanic, muslim, mentally incompetent....then according to society....in..this home of the "brave" land of the "free" place where you can be any body you want to be...but wait did you read the unseen print..?!?
by Bob 04/25/07 01:35 PM
How many of the inmates are non-violent drug offenders with no other charges?
by Jason 04/25/07 01:34 PM
Isn't the county all excited about using some former bus terminal to house the homeless? Why not use it for housing inmates?
by tonee 04/25/07 01:33 PM
if there were more and better alternatives for "offenders" instead of the political posturing and the blatant racism,favortism,shabby legal representation for the poor then we wouldn,t see nearly the numbers we see now but as we all know or should$$!
by scott 04/25/07 01:11 PM
Wade; they lock people up who aren't dangerous because the Sheriffs department gets "x" amount of money per day to house an inmate from the state. If they keep the cost below that payout, then the "extra" money goes to help fund other things.
by JT 04/25/07 10:52 AM
I am not looking for a deal, I want a safe community. Pinellas seems to attract homeless and criminal minded. How about using tents to house these folks in like out in Phoenix. Taxpayers and schoolchildren deserve better not criminals.
by Wade 04/25/07 10:47 AM
Why do we lock up people who are not dangerous? Save jails for those who represent a threat to society. Cite others, and have them appear in court. Our approach to jails and prisons does not make sense. We can't afford to lock up so many.
by Rich 04/25/07 09:36 AM
The Times should track the inmates who are released and see how many of them get re-arrested.
by leigh 04/25/07 09:02 AM
I dont know why they dont use house arrest more often. Putting people in jail is not going to turn them around, I think we need to look at the Arizona system, hasnt anyone realized yet that once they commit a crime they continue this path.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT