St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Cable bill loses a critical clause

By REBECCA CATALANELLO
Published April 25, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

TALLAHASSEE - In the telephone industry's multimillion-dollar battle for access to Florida's TV market, cable companies and consumer groups suffered a serious blow Tuesday.

With a unanimous vote and little discussion, the Senate Committee on General Government Appropriations undid what it took cable companies and consumer groups four weeks to achieve.

Sponsor Mike Bennett, R-Bradenton, removed language requiring companies entering a cable TV market to offer services to 50 percent of low-income residences - a provision inserted by Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, last month.

The bill would allow telephone companies to get franchising authority from the state, rather than local counties and municipalities.

Supporters such as Rep. Trey Traviesa, R-Tampa, who pushed a version of the bill through the House, say the increased competition could benefit consumers by $407-million. Opponents worry it would strip local governments of control and encourage market entrants to cherry-pick the most profitable neighborhoods.

Consumer activists for ACORN, Florida Public Interest Research Group and the Consumer Federation of the Southeast blasted the committee action as ignoring consumer voices, but cable industry leaders were more measured.

"This is a work in progress," said Steve Wilkerson of the Florida Cable Telecommunications Association.

[Last modified April 25, 2007, 00:55:45]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Laura 05/04/07 02:42 PM
You might want to check out some of the particulars of the NYS "Omnibus Telecommunications Reform Act" (A.3980A)." It allows statewide cable franchising but has many protections.seehttp://www.thealbanyproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=715
by Carl 04/26/07 05:50 AM
The removal of the buildout clause was the only way to protect the residents and promote competition from companies smaller than ATT. There are many but they could not afford to buildout entire towns on a short timetable. The bill is now a good one.
by BadBob 04/25/07 10:31 PM
Ask Californians how competition helped their electric utility rates. Hah!
by Diane 04/25/07 08:22 PM
Would someone please tell me why low income people are entitled to cable? Cable is a LUXURY, not a necessity.
by JT 04/25/07 04:07 PM
When Senator Fasano and ACORN are on the same page it is time to look at replacing him because I certainly would not elect them to represent me. Fasano is being led like sheep on the property tax and insurance issue. He is not really fighting for us
by John 04/25/07 07:42 AM
As stated previously, don't count the telephone lobby out, they have exercised control over the Florida Legislature forever and they are not going to let go of their strangle hold. Ma Bell has been resurrected in the new At&T
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT