News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
I followed the law, didn't trade favors
By TOM FEENEY Special to the Times
Published May 3, 2007
I would like to take this opportunity to address recent articles and editorials by the St. Petersburg Times regarding my association with a high-profile case.
First and foremost, I say without any hesitation that during my 16 years of public service, I have personally followed the law and in no way ever traded legislative favors for personal gain. Any suggestion otherwise is untrue and incredibly offensive.
The implication in Sunday's St. Petersburg Times article that I traded legislative favors to benefit a lobbyist is an outright lie. I take my responsibility and oath to this office very seriously and have represented constituents with the integrity they deserve.
In August 2003, I went on a trip to Scotland, based on an invitation to meet governmental dignitaries. I was told that a public policy group was sponsoring the trip. My staff contacted the House Ethics Committee prior to my going on the trip and was told that members had gone on similar trips in the recent past.
At the time of the trip, I personally paid for my flight out of Scotland, greens fees and other activities. As soon as I learned that there was concern about the trip and trip sponsor, I took it upon myself to request an opinion from the Ethics Committee on how to proceed to ensure that all legal and ethical steps were taken by me. I immediately followed their direction and wrote a personal check to the U.S. Treasury in the only amount that had been reported to my office at the time in association with the trip, as is standard practice.
I would like to clarify the fact that the House Ethics Committee has made no finding that I violated any House rules, and they have since closed their file on this.
On Sunday, the St. Petersburg Times editorial board implied that I conspired with criminals in order to receive personal gain, and I once again state with absolute conviction that I did no such thing. Investigations continue, and I have been told I am not a target of the investigation. I feel that it is entirely appropriate and necessary that there will be a thorough and immediate investigation, and I am happy to voluntarily provide information to investigators. I know that the more information they have, the clearer it will become that I followed the law.
As I have said before, and will say again, I am saddened and embarrassed to be associated on any level with anyone who abused the public trust. While I wish in retrospect that I had never been on that trip, I am certain that all facts uncovered will prove that I acted only in accordance with the law.
Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Feeney represents Florida's 24th District.
[Last modified May 2, 2007, 20:45:18]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Dan
|
05/03/07 01:59 PM
|
|
Feeney, you went to SCOTLAND, stayed at a 4 star resort, played golf at elite country clubs and are now saying you honestly believe this high falutin, lobbiest backed trip only cost $5,000? I can't even go on a mid-tier Disney vacation for that much!
|
|
by Ken
|
05/03/07 12:45 PM
|
|
Anybody could write this kind of "who me?". This guy still looks, walks, and talks like a duck. So his statement must be duck doodoo.
|
|
by Frank
|
05/03/07 12:25 PM
|
|
Democrats have never ever violated the public trust, or ever done anything immoral.
|
|
by Sam
|
05/03/07 12:09 PM
|
|
Do you take me for a fool sir, have you no sense of decency, you are a liar and a thief. Out of the historical respect for the sacred and trusted office you hold, you Tom Feeney should RESIGN.
|
|
by Milton
|
05/03/07 12:06 PM
|
|
Feeney's reply has the ring of a guy testing the CYA water......Everyone else on the trip is either in jail or forced out of office. Ethics from a Republican? yeah right!
|
|
by bruce
|
05/03/07 11:30 AM
|
|
How much did you "pay" for the trip? You left out this important point that would expose your hypocrisy. You need to resign because you truly don't have ethics, because if you had any at all, you would not have to ask others if your acts are ethical!
|
|
by Dee
|
05/03/07 11:10 AM
|
|
As the saying goes "He who protests too loudly etc." Need I say more??
|
|
by KG
|
05/03/07 10:06 AM
|
|
Feeney goes on an expensive golf trip with a powerful lobbyist, and wants us to believe there was no quid pro quo? please Mr Feeney, I was born at night, but not last night.
|
|
by mike
|
05/03/07 09:30 AM
|
|
I'm sure the House Ethics Committee will side with you, Tom. They are all probably republicans too.
|
|
by Satan
|
05/03/07 08:53 AM
|
|
Whateeeeeeevvvverr!
|
|
by mary sweeney
|
05/03/07 08:12 AM
|
|
then why did he lie on his taxes about the trip? reepublicans lie as if they were praying. hypocrites all the way around.
|
|
by Jim
|
05/03/07 08:00 AM
|
|
I agree, if he was moral, he couldn't be republican. He says he went on a trip and didn't know who was paying?!! LOL. He sounds like a dirty guy who knows he can beat the rap. Educated voters = no more "elected" Republicans.
|
|
by Moustache Peet
|
05/03/07 07:20 AM
|
|
Personal to Mr Feeny. Next time you go to Scotland don't do it on my dime. If you are going to take a vacation take it when your off work like the rest of us.
|
|
by David
|
05/03/07 07:10 AM
|
|
Nixon also "followed the law"-in letter but not in "spirit" or "ethically"- stop crying-you are for sale to the highest bidder-that's your business. Take your $ and shut up.
|
|
by jim
|
05/03/07 05:06 AM
|
|
Feeney's reply has the ring of a guy who is confident of his status and has the facts on his side.
|
|
by spud
|
05/03/07 05:05 AM
|
|
He is a Repuglican, that says everything you need to know about his ethics.
|