St. Petersburg Times
Tampa Bay
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Artist's work looked familiar

His ironic T-shirts delighted fans, but there was one small problem to overcome.

By S.I. ROSENBAUM
Published May 8, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT
photo
[Times file photo, 2004: Carrie Pratt]
Todd Goldman has admitted copying the work of a cartoonist named David Kelly. He and Kelly have reached a settlement, according to Goldman's press agency. But on the Internet, the public shaming continues.

photo
[Times file photo, 2004: Carrie Pratt]
By 2004, Goldman's company had produced 3,500 graphic designs and was selling close to $90-million worth of merchandise.

CLEARWATER - It was a kitty. Or maybe a squirrel. Either way, it was cute, and it was kneeling at a cute little bed, with a cute thought balloon over its head that said "Dear God, please make everyone die."

The image was pure Todd Goldman - the kind of ironic design that built his T-shirt company into a $90-million media business.

There was only one problem: Goldman didn't draw it.

He copied it, with a few small changes, from the work of a cartoonist named David Kelly.

In March, Goldman sold two oil paintings of the cat/squirrel for about $5, 000 each. In April, when Kelly found out about the paintings, he denounced Goldman as an art thief on a Web site.

What followed was an superheated Internet explosion.

Hundreds of angry artists and designers tore into Goldman's work, calling him a fake and a hack.

"Man, I can't wait for him to be brought down, " one blogger wrote.

Another publicly fantasized about "violently shoving this guy's pencils under all his fingernails."

Goldman, 38, has admitted copying Kelly's work, which he said was a mistake.

He and Kelly have reached a settlement, according to Goldman's press agency. But on the Internet, the public shaming continues.

Jim Benton, a fellow T-shirt designer, said Goldman's fans bought into his image as a creative, original artist.

"If you're in the business of 'clever, ' there's sort of a promise, a covenant: 'I promise to be clever, and you promise to love me and my cleverness, ' " explained Benton.

By copying another person's art, Goldman betrayed that trust, Benton said. "It's like if you find out a rock star is lip synching."

Innovated thinker hailed; sales explode

Goldman's art dealer, Jack Solomon, sees it differently. Goldman made a mistake, he said, but he doesn't deserve to be pilloried.

"The real story is that with the Web, anybody can go out and ruin someone, " Solomon said.

Goldman declined to be interviewed for this story, first dismissing the controversy as "false accusations and blogging, " then hanging up the phone on a reporter.

But he was happy to give an interview to the St. Petersburg Times in 2004.

"I just keep coming up with ideas and ideas, " he said then.

A University of Florida graduate, Goldman started his T-shirt company, David & Goliath, in 2000 with a $250, 000 loan from his father.

His first success was a series of shirts with crudely drawn figures and snarky captions: "Boys are smelly, " "Boys have cooties, " "Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them."

The designs got him noticed, and soon the shirts were selling at Bloomingdale's and Urban Outfitters.

Not everyone liked them. In 2004, a radio commentator named Glenn Sacks attacked Goldman for his "antiboy" shirts. Some stores stopped carrying them.

Goldman shrugged it off. His line had already expanded.

He added a series of shirts featuring "Goodbye Kitty, " an ill-fated cartoon cat. Then came "Eve L." the sinister goth girl, "Meatball" the fat guy, and dozens more.

Retailers couldn't get enough.

"Todd stood out as an innovative thinker, " Brandweek editor Karen Benezra told the Times in 2004, the year her magazine named Goldman one of its 10 Marketers of the Next Generation.

By that time, Goldman's company had produced 3, 500 graphic designs and was selling close to $90-million worth of merchandise.

New frontier beckons: the pop art world

He broke into the art world when a friend passed some of his designs to Jack Solomon, of the S2 Art Group, based in Las Vegas.

To Solomon, Goldman's designs were in the pop art tradition of Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein, but with a humorous streak.

"This guy is politically incorrect, " Solomon said. "America is so uptight, we're afraid to say the wrong word, but he does it in a very disarming and funny way. He makes fun of everyone."

Goldman sold the two paintings copied from David Kelly's work in Solomon's galleries. Soloman wouldn't disclose their exact price, but said that most of Goldman's oil paintings sell for $4, 000-$5, 000.

When Kelly discovered the sale, he contacted the Las Vegas Sun.

"Here's somebody taking my intellectual property and ruining it by making money off it, " Kelly told the paper. "Everyone can see that he traced it. There is no denying it."

Reached last week, Solomon said his client had made an honest mistake. Many of Goldman's designs legally incorporate existing art, Solomon said. Sometimes he licences designs from artists or uses art that isn't owned by anyone. In this case, he said, Goldman just didn't check to make sure the image was in the common domain.

"The guy knocked it off, but he didn't do it on purpose, " Solomon said.

After Kelly made his accusation, designers, cartoonists and T-shirt aficionados began to scrutinize Goldman's work online. They found many similarities to other sources.

Goldman's character "Goodbye Kitty, " for instance, bears a marked resemblance to a graphic from an old computer program, they said. The character "Meatball" seems similar to an illustration from a defunct spelling textbook. And many of Goldman's slogans are similar to those emblazoned on Jim Benton's T-shirts.

Benton said he won't accuse his colleague of plagiarism. But he said he was impressed with his fans for bringing the issue to his attention.

"For someone to send me something saying 'I think this person is stealing from you, ' that's a really new phenomenon, where a fan is becoming the custodian of the brand, " he said.

Settlement reached, but damage done

On May 3, Goldman's publicity agent announced that Goldman and Kelly had reached a settlement. Goldman would pay Kelly the money he earned from the paintings. Kelly agreed to drop his protest.

But some damage had already been done.

Solomon said that several galleries stopped showing Goldman's work. And the wholesalers who buy Goldman's posters canceled their orders and asked for refunds for unsold stock.

"I lost the three biggest poster distributors in America, " Solomon said. He wouldn't say how much money he and Goldman may have lost.

Solomon added that he called both of the collectors who bought the copied paintings. He explained that the paintings were plagiarized, and offered a refund.

Both refused, he said. One was delighted.

"He said, 'Oh my gosh, this is going to be a famous painting, ' " Solomon recalled. " 'I want to keep it!' "

S.I. Rosenbaum can be reached at (813) 323-1243 or srosenbaum@sptimes.com.

[Last modified May 7, 2007, 23:22:25]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Jennifer 03/06/08 02:25 PM
inspired artist. I'm not saying that what he did was right, but I'd like to see one of us normal folks, even an artist like myself build the comedic clothing franchise that Goldman has built.
by Jennifer 03/06/08 02:24 PM
You're obviously not thinking very indepthly on the subject. Do you know how difficult it is to come up with something today that is one hundred percent original? All art is inspired by other art, be it in nature or invented by some other also
by ebeneezerspooge 05/17/07 04:45 PM
Good God, that horrid smiling visage of his is going to give me nightmares for weeks. I can let the t-shirt thing go. Big business is evil and shifty by nature, but this douche is marauding as an artist, and that's where I draw the line.
by bullet 05/16/07 05:08 PM
There's a big diff between having similar works and stealing another's intellectual property. Goldman should know. He went from stealing ideas to pieces of artwork to the whole piece. He ripped off some corporate art, too. Check the website below.
by Brent 05/12/07 02:39 PM
Goldman is a symbol of everything that is wrong with art. The hack didn't even go to art school, he majored in accounting for crying out loud. His entire career has been based upon and built by lies. Hopefully his career as a (scam)artist is over.
by jess 05/11/07 08:57 PM
Some people must not know how BIG Tshirt companies work, they have MANY designers working as a team.Did you really think someone like Paul Frank designed every character in his tshirt line? Gimme a break, u people r drowning in a glass of water,dumb!
by Maritza 05/11/07 01:31 PM
It's not Dave Kellet. It's Dave Kelly. Two completely different webcartoonists, you know.
by Alluvial 05/11/07 12:29 AM
"The guy knocked it off, but he didn't do it on purpose, " Solomon said. "This guy purposely copied work that was not his own to make a profit, but he really didn't mean to copy anyone," Solomon said. (Fixed!) All art belongs to -someone.-
by Alluvial 05/11/07 12:29 AM
Goldman is as bad as Jeff Koons. He pays others to be creative for him. He brought the bad publicity upon himself. If you operate like a talentless hack, SOMEONE is going to call you on it eventually. He's shamed, but he's still got most of his money
by vanessa 05/10/07 05:49 PM
It sounds like everyone is mad because HIS T-SHIRT COMPANY (not him) made 90mil. If he hadn't, would people b this mad? all t-shirt companies knock eachother off, why do people care about this one? it's dumb, I hate that i wasted my time reading this
by IkaTaii 05/10/07 04:57 PM
Ben: It's important to note, though, that the other artistic factories are based on producing the artists ideas. Goldman's factory is based on producing other people's (he even admits to it in the releases).
by Picasso 05/09/07 10:25 PM
Good artists borrow, great artists steal.
by Ben 05/09/07 09:30 PM
While I agree that Goldman blatantly plagiarized, I must raise a point with Charlene. Every major Renessaince artist had a staff who worked on their master's art without recognition. Warhol had his "art factory." Chihuley has one too.
by Rick 05/09/07 08:38 PM
This is what happens when your rich daddy gives you money to build your own company. Too bad education didn't come with it.
by Sam 05/09/07 08:31 PM
Webcomics are generally garbage? I know it was a side comment, but still. Order of the Stick, Girl Genius, Schlock Mercenary, Questionable Content, Girly, PVP, Penny Arcade, XKCD; there are a lot of good comics if you bother to look.
by Anonymous 05/09/07 08:27 PM
High five, internet. Maybe not the ideal turnout, but we did pretty well for an artifically disconnected system of unintentional hierarchies. Maybe it wasn't huge, or even big, but this is one Anonymous who is feeling pretty good.
by Verbatim 05/09/07 07:34 PM
Here's a rundown on Goldman's swiping (thus far) - http://www.miketyndall.com/todd_goldman/
by who cares 05/09/07 04:56 PM
The guy admitted to wrong doing. Past having him compensate the original artists what can you really do. The updated art & anecdotes do the original artists justice. Let the man be, he will pay in some way or another. Step off the high horses people.
by Martin 05/09/07 02:02 PM
The web comics are generally garbage. Goldman's work is garbage. Way too much of a big deal has been made about nothing.
by Ray 05/09/07 11:35 AM
Goldman actually pulled up the threadless.com website and told his "artists" to go to town copying as much as they could. The similarities are obvious.
by Andy 05/09/07 11:22 AM
Now he just needs to compensate all of the other artists he's stolen from (and that's alot!).
by Nora 05/09/07 11:03 AM
There's always a 'Paul' in these art theft cases. Provide much original content for the world much lately, Paul, to say that artists 'deserve' to be stolen from? "Coke/Pepsi??" What a sad comparison to this case.
by Tony 05/09/07 10:00 AM
Todd Goldman has stolen from some many artists it is shameful. Everyone runs the risk of having a memory re-appear in their work, but this is just theft. I know because he copied/stole a design from a friend of mine at www.t-shirthumor.com
by Charlene 05/09/07 06:32 AM
This wasn't "accidental plagiarism". If you google, you'll find that the designs are so similar that there can't have been an accident. You'll also find that Goldman has a staff who thinks up ideas for him. What kind of an artist has a staff?
by Miko 05/09/07 05:13 AM
Everything Todd Goldman has ever made a dime off is stolen from someone else. He doesn't deserve a penny of that money, and the people who do haven't seen any of it. He should go directly to jail, not collect $200.
by Nora 05/09/07 02:29 AM
Of course Jack Solomon sees it differently. Why rock the gravy train? Yes, anyone can go one the net and ruin someone, but this story obviously hit a nerve with a _lot_ of people and its painfully obvious and sad that Jack is totally biased.
by tekel 05/09/07 01:52 AM
"this is going to be a famous painting?" That's not how art works, kiddo. Van Gogh: famous. All the people who copied him: fake. David Kelly painting: famous. Todd Goldman painting: fake as a three dollar bill.
by Dick 05/09/07 01:44 AM
It strikes me as funny when one person says someones art looks like theirs since really most art is just that...the same as everything else, give me a break most artist work is junk.
by Dave 05/09/07 01:08 AM
This article mentions one copying incident. Actually there are several *dozen* examples of Todd Goldman copying many other artists almost exactly. Do an Internet search.
by Kate 05/08/07 11:09 PM
He stole Eve L. from Roman Dirge (Eve L. = cheap Lenore ripoff) and Goodbye Kitty from a set of kitty emoticons, too.
by Paul 05/08/07 03:11 PM
So because it has a different origin, it can't be appreciated? It's not like this stuff is from an Old Master - for cryin' out loud... a seven year-old could do it! Face it, knock-offs make the American world go 'round. Coke/Pepsi.
by David 05/08/07 01:33 PM
As a cartoonist, if someone had plagiarized my work in this way, I would be extremely angry. I think Goldman is getting off easy, but I'm glad he's been exposed as a thief.
by John 05/08/07 01:12 PM
Goldman's a thief and a hack. Period.
by confused 05/08/07 12:52 PM
Goldman directly copied Chip Wass for his main "Boys are Stupid, Throw Rocks at Them" design, as well as another of Wass' illustrations of a girl. Heck, they were made for Intel. How is he getting away with stealing from an illustrator AND a company?
by JT 05/08/07 12:41 PM
I do a webcomics news podcast, and we reported on this weeks ago. Dave Kellet is a webcartoonist, So it's not surprising that most of the world has not seenthe original. Goldman has borrowed art and ideas form many while building his wealth. JT
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT