News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Attorney general's exit is long overdue
By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published May 20, 2007
Now that it has been arranged to have Paul Wolfowitz walk out the door at the World Bank, there is one bit of unfinished business: Alberto Gonzales. The attorney general is a cooked goose, except he and President Bush don't recognize the oven's been turned on. The revelations keep coming about Gonzales' lack of candor and his incompetence. The sooner he goes, the sooner professionalism and credibility will return to the Justice Department.
The latest scandal involves the role Gonzales played in invading the hospital room of then-Attorney General John Ashcroft. The riveting congressional hearing testimony of former Deputy Attorney General James Comey of that night in March 2004 raises serious questions about Gonzales' legal judgment and integrity.
Comey had been given the temporary powers of attorney general while Ashcroft recovered from gallbladder surgery. But when Comey refused to reauthorize the warrantless domestic wiretapping program because the department's lawyers had determined that it wasn't operating within the bounds of law, then-White House counsel Gonzales and then-White House chief of staff Andrew Card tried to wrench approval from Ashcroft at his hospital bed.
After a very sick Ashcroft refused, it appears that Gonzales went along with the reauthorization of the program despite its determined illegality. According to Comey, it wasn't until a mass resignation of high-level department officials was threatened that the wiretapping program was revised in accordance with department recommendations.
Gonzales remains confused about our system of checks and balances. He has defended the idea that the president can ignore the law when it constrains his warmaking - a dangerous and misguided reading of the separation of powers, particularly when the war at issue is the amorphous war on terror. Gonzales' appearance at Ashcroft's hospital bed demonstrates once again that he cares more about the president's agenda than fealty to the law.
Pile this on top of the debacle of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, a controversy that continues to grow as more facts emerge, and it is clear this attorney general is unfit for the job.
Only President Bush expressed increased confidence in Gonzales after he testified recently about the U.S. attorney firings before a Senate committee. Gonzales' frequent memory lapses regarding key meetings and conversations was disconcerting. He was unable to explain the conflicting accounts he gave of why these U.S. attorneys were fired and to what extent he was involved in the decisionmaking.
After Gonzales' confused performance, even some Republicans were disgusted. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said Gonzales should resign, and other Republicans have joined him.
Senate Democrats intend to hold a no-confidence vote to register the chamber's growing dissatisfaction with Gonzales. How much more heat is needed before Gonzales follows Wolfowitz, either by choice or by a push from the White House?
[Last modified May 19, 2007, 20:10:45]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Pat
|
05/23/07 08:33 PM
|
|
Sandra: heckuvajob, sore loser! Still licking old wounds of election losses?
|
|
by Kel
|
05/23/07 08:28 PM
|
|
We can guess what Busyboy is busy doing, reading DNC talking points. have any original thoughts?
|
|
by Sandra
|
05/22/07 02:41 PM
|
|
Heckuvajob, Gonzo!
|
|
by Busboy33
|
05/21/07 11:42 PM
|
|
@JH:
newsflash -- ALL the presidents can the 93 attys when they come into office, including W. This is firing in the middle of the term, extremely unusual (5 US attys canned in the middle of a term in last 25 years).
|
|
by Tim
|
05/21/07 10:34 PM
|
|
When the Attorney General of the United States Gonzales, made a statement that, "the Constitution doesn't guarantee habeas corpus", that statement should have lead to his immeadiate removal from office. www.ripoffattorney.com
|
|
by Tim
|
05/21/07 10:23 PM
|
|
Let's not forget this one: "The Constitution doesn't say every individual in the United States or every citizen is hereby granted or assured the right of habeas,' Gonzales told Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing."
|
|
by Sarah
|
05/21/07 01:59 PM
|
|
Reno is sooooo 6 years ago. Let it go, already. Gonzalez/Bush/Cheney are the problems du jour...
|
|
by Darryl
|
05/21/07 01:09 PM
|
|
I think that many Americans simply will not accept the fact that Gonzalez (and others) couldn't tie their shoes without permission. This mess, like Iraq and others, goes all the way to the top. Bush, Cheney, et al. need to go. Now.
|
|
by Allison
|
05/21/07 12:58 PM
|
|
Those that continue to harp about Clinton do so b.c they do not want you to realize how stupid they are to still be believing in the Bush admin. b.s. Bush has never been For the people, he has always been take advantage Of the people.
|
|
by Patrick
|
05/21/07 11:48 AM
|
|
Gonzales' removal from his post, whether by choice or by force, is way overdue. The question that remains is, will he walk out the door with a huge paycheck as Wolfowitz did? These people make more getting fired than some of us do working.
|
|
by JH
|
05/21/07 09:19 AM
|
|
Hey times editorial, what about when the Clintons fored all 93 US attorneys incuding those who were investigating crimes very close to them. How about the blatant misuse of the Presidential pardons. Can you say Marc Rich?
|
|
by KYJurisDoctor
|
05/20/07 09:13 PM
|
|
Maybe, just maybe there is a voice of reason out there that can convince Gonzales to be "nudged" out to a new post!
http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2007/05/get-ready-for-great-compromise-on.html#links
|
|
by Margaret
|
05/20/07 09:10 PM
|
|
Gonzales shares the arrogance of his boss. Because of his dishonesty and incompetence, Mr. Gonzales is incapable of leading the Justice Department. Bush may be the only one left unable to see this. The legacy of this Administration is disgrace.
|
|
by Pat
|
05/20/07 06:20 PM
|
|
What does Janet Reno have to do with Gonzales's? It's time for this administration to start fixing it's own self created problems. My goodness the Clinton's have been gone for awhile.
|
|
by jim
|
05/20/07 03:20 PM
|
|
right on, Bud. The Times was silent on the incompentence and venality of the Reno justice dept. What about the far-eastern woman whose trial Reno postponed until after the 2000 elections, Pauline Kanchanalak. She left the country on a plea deal
|
|
by CTurner
|
05/20/07 02:46 PM
|
|
For those whose spin-translator is out of order, I'll translate Bud's comment for you: "My guy got caught red-handed. Let's stop talking about MY guy and start talking about YOUR guy.
Back on topic: Gonzales is a disgrace, and needs to go now.
|
|
by Don
|
05/20/07 01:57 PM
|
|
Somewhere there is a bad smell within the administration. Who is next. You have to wonder, who will come out on top. Just watch the next election. The Bush camp is on very shakey ground.
|
|
by Dave
|
05/20/07 12:08 PM
|
|
Did I just see a "But...but...Clinton" reference there in the first post?
Janet Reno is ancient history. Current scumbags are the order of the day.
|
|
by Mark
|
05/20/07 10:42 AM
|
|
Bud, let me give you my take on Gonzales compared to Reno. Reno is an American who sought to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Gonzales is a Republican who doesn't know what that document is.
|
|
by Harold
|
05/20/07 09:20 AM
|
|
Just curious Bud, 2 wrongs do not make a right no matter what party is involved. Unfortunately, many politicians are more concerned about their own personal agendas. Where are men of morality who are willing to question these self-serving policies
|
|
by Bud
|
05/20/07 08:38 AM
|
|
Just curious about your opinion of Gonzales compared to Janet Reno?
|
|
by Tom
|
05/20/07 07:46 AM
|
|
"Fredo" is just following orders. His testimony should be proof to Congress just how far this administration is willing to go to circumnavigate the Constitution. A no confidence vote should be followed by an impeachment vote for his bosses.
|