News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Columns
The little House bill that could (be vetoed)
By HOWARD TROXLER
Published May 24, 2007
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Times photo: Ron Thompson (1995)]
If House Bill 9 is signed by Gov. Charlie Crist, you will not be able to walk along railroad tracks in Florida because it would considered trespassing.
|
|
He used to carry his guitar in a gunny sack
Go sit beneath the tree by the railroad track ...
As Chuck Berry's song tells us, Johnny B. Goode was from Louisiana.
It's a good thing, too. If Johnny tried to hang out by the tracks in Florida, under a bill just passed by our Legislature, he would automatically be guilty of trespassing.
"I didn't know I was lawbreakin'," our young Mr. Goode might protest as he was being hauled away by his gunny sack. "I didn't see a sign or anything."
But the deputies would just hand Johnny a copy of House Bill 9, which says you ought to know already that railroad tracks are private property -- no signs required.
See, the way our trespassing law works, you have to know that you're someplace you're not supposed to be.
A house or building, that's easy to tell. But here's what counts, when it comes to trespassing on somebody's land:
- The owner already told you to stay off.
- There were "No Trespassing" signs posted every 500 feet.
- You climbed a fence.
- The land was cultivated in a way that showed it was somebody else's.
This brings us to the 2,788 miles of railroad track in Florida -- usually not fenced or posted with signs. In fact, it would take 58,000 signs to do the job, the state calculates.
So this year our Legislature passed a bill filed by lawmakers from Jacksonville -- the home city of CSX Transportation Inc.
The bill adds protection to property that is "readily recognizable to a reasonable person as being the property of a railroad or railway company."
It was controversial. Although the bill passed the House 113-2, it squeaked by the Senate 20-19, and even then a senator tried too late to change his vote.
Now Gov. Charlie Crist has to decide whether to veto it.
The main opposition comes from the Florida Justice Association, previously known as the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers. The group says that the signs help law-abiding but unaware citizens.
(Florida ranks third nationally in deaths of railroad trespassers, a fact cited both by supporters and opponents.)
I talked to Jamie Holland, a board member of the lawyers' group and a national leader in railroad law. I asked: Shouldn't people know not to walk down railroad tracks?
It's not that simple, Holland replied. Remember that the railroad track is a staple of American culture. In films (Stand By Me), in music videos (Every Mile a Memory), in all sorts of ways, the image of walking down a railroad track is lasting, even romantic.
So it's easy for people to get the idea it's just another quasi-public route, Holland argued. Especially kids. So we need signs to remind everybody.
You know what? I'll buy that. Some people are gonna trespass anyway, but it can't hurt to remind the rest. Besides , it makes a heck of a lot more sense than some of the warnings our law requires.
So if I am the gov, I veto the thing.
- - -
At the risk of shameless self-promotion, I ask you to check out my online blog, TroxBlog, for fresh daily commentary, reader opinions and weekly live chats. Find the "Blogs" link on our web site, www.tampabay.com, or just type in blogs.tampabay.com/troxler. If enough people look at it, see, I get a cookie.
[Last modified May 24, 2007, 02:01:12]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Beverly
|
05/24/07 11:50 AM
|
|
Negligence:The doing of that thing which a reasonably prudent person would not have done or the failure to do that thing which a reasonably prudent person would have done in like or similar circumstances. Holding CSX liable for people's stupidity?
|
|
by Kay
|
05/24/07 08:45 AM
|
|
Thank you for being you. I've never seen a group of Representatives more easily led by lobbyists than ours - even Texans.
|
|
by Schauer
|
05/24/07 08:44 AM
|
|
It's not a "criminal" act the bill deals with but it appears to give the Railroad companies a pass in tort liability. Instead of having to put up fences to keep kids away from the tracks they can now say they were ingaged in criminal acts no liability
|
|
by jim you-know-who
|
05/24/07 05:15 AM
|
|
What if I decide that it's romantic/inspiring/rewarding for me to trespass on YOUR property Howard?
|