Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Health costs, retirement will bust budget, panel says
By STEPHEN NOHLGREN
Published May 31, 2007
TAMPA - Harping about balanced budgets, third-party candidate Ross Perot captured 19 percent of the 1992 presidential vote and the attention of winner Bill Clinton. The Clinton presidency took an unexpected tack toward fiscal conservatism. Now, America's chief accountant and an eclectic group of think-tankers are trying to emulate Perot. Calling themselves the "Fiscal Wakeup Tour, " they are criss-crossing early primary states to sound alarms about rising health care costs and retiring baby boomers. If nothing changes over the next four decades, Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare will consume about 20 percent of the nation's economy - equivalent to what the entire federal budget takes up today, Comptroller General David M. Walker told a forum Wednesday at the University of South Florida. Unfunded liabilities for the three programs over the next 75 years amount to $50-trillion, he said. "If we don't get our act together, my generation will be the first generation in our nation's history not to discharge our stewardship to the next generation, " Walker said. Joining Walker were Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, Alison Fraser of the Heritage Foundation and Jason Furman of the Brookings Institution. When pressed for specifics, they disagreed on solutions. Fraser, for example, thought Congress should extend Bush administration tax cuts, saying they stimulate the economy. Furman said the cuts deepened the federal debt, which will inexorably sap the economy. They all agreed that putting Social Security on sound footing will be easier than reducing Medicare's long-run costs. Walker threw out possible Social Security changes: pushing back the retirement age; skewing benefits toward lower-income people; raising the cap on taxable wages; and imposing an extra 2 percent tax to fund private, individual accounts. Florida's Republican senator, Mel Martinez, who invited the tour to USF, joked that his recent lead role in contentious immigration reform makes entitlement issues seem less imposing. "People say Social Security is the third rail of politics, don't touch it, " Martinez said. "The fact is, we have no choice but to touch it. If politicians keep punting the ball down the field so our children will have to deal with it, we have not done our duty." John Rother, policy director for the AARP, applauded the group for highlighting fiscal problems. But he cautioned against focusing too much on the federal budget and not enough on restraining health care costs. The government should use its buying power to lower prices and focus more on wellness, he said in a telephone interview. "We are not getting good value for health care dollars compared to other countries."
[Last modified May 31, 2007, 01:25:11]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by JT
|
06/11/07 12:26 PM
|
|
Those making over $100,000 are paying a lot into SS & Medicare. Does anyone believe they would do it if they are not able to fully participate? I would support an opt out plan if you don't want to keep steeling my earnings because I will get benefits
|
|
by Curry
|
06/01/07 04:24 PM
|
|
Social Security was never designed for an individual's sole support. Anyone making over $100,000 a year can not justify taking social security dollars from those in great and desperate need.
Funds must go to where there is the greatest need!
|
|
by Austin
|
06/01/07 04:21 PM
|
|
We must become involved in our own healthcare. We must take responsibility for ourselves and thosed in our care. We can not have government taking of everyone in the world. The dollars that are available must go to the most needy in our society!
|
|
by hmodoc
|
06/01/07 01:09 PM
|
|
Unless the consumer has realistic and reasonable expectation out of the entitlement health care programs AND physicians and hospitals can control their greed, nothing can stop the runaway train. HMOs and Pharma got more than their share of blame.
|
|
by Meriam
|
05/31/07 04:07 PM
|
|
Medical expenses are way out of line to begin with. In addition we are expending billions to help a people who hate us as much as they hate each other.
hat money is better spent in the U.S. where it is needed!
|
|