St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Woman convicted in equity fraud case

She and her husband, who was convicted last year, made about $70,000 in two years.

By JOSE CARDENAS
Published June 1, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

They were 20 homeowners from St. Petersburg to Hudson who owed little on their houses or owned them outright.

But when they sold their houses to a real estate agent and her husband, the homeowners became victims of fraud, a jury decided Thursday night.

Some lost their homes altogether. Others spent tens of thousands of dollars to get their homes back.

Synthia Ippolito, 37, was convicted of scheming to defraud and "equity skimming." She can receive a maximum of 30 years in prison.

Ippolito, a former Largo resident who now lives in Hudson, has seven children, ages 3 to 14.

"This person took all my savings and retirement money," Donna Chadwick, who testified during the trial, said in a letter to the court. "I now work two jobs to try to recoup the losses."

Ippolito's ex-husband, Christopher Nickelson, 45, was convicted in the scheme last year and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Jurors deliberated about three hours, rejecting a defense argument that Ippolito was a victim of domestic violence who was forced into some of the fraudulent transactions.

Between 1998 and 2000, Nickelson and Ippolito bought homes in which the owners had built up a lot of equity, Assistant State Attorney Evan Brodsky said.

They convinced the sellers to lend them about half the asking price on the houses they bought, authorities said. The couple promised the sellers monthly payments for a few years, followed by a final balloon payment.

The couple then went to private lenders, officials said. The lenders, individuals who made loans as investments, made a second loan to the couple for the rest of the purchase price because the properties had a lot of equity.

The deal was structured so the lenders' mortgages would have priority over the sellers' mortgages. That meant that if the couple stopped paying everyone, the lenders could take over the property.

At closings, Ippolito and Nickelson spent some of the money from the lenders on closing costs, down payments, and a few monthly mortgage payments. Typically, authorities said, they walked away with a couple of thousand dollars.

They put renters in the homes, but soon stopped making payments to the sellers and lenders.

The equity skimming occurred when the couple took rent money on mortgaged homes that were in default and spent it on themselves. Prosecutors said the couple made a total of about $70,000 from the transactions.

During the seven-day trial, defense attorney Robert Tager argued that Nickelson had been doing those transactions years before he met Ippolito. Ippolito, he said, wanted to learn from her new husband how to invest in property with no money down. She bought a few properties on her own in the beginning with no intent to commit fraud, Tager said.

Ippolito testified that in some of the later transactions, Nickelson coerced her through physical abuse.

[Last modified June 1, 2007, 07:02:15]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Bill 06/01/07 07:57 PM
Shelly, thanks for your response. If there is equity the second mortgage has a claim. The first mortgagee can't wipe out junior liens if it's adequately secured. What's going on here? How is it the junior position is getting wiped out?
by Steve 06/01/07 04:55 PM
Where is the coercion?
by SHELLY 06/01/07 04:13 PM
I have been following posts, kind of confused. Im reading last post from anonymous, maybe her family was involved also, this story may get bigger. I hope not, let this be a lesson for all to check out your realtor, buyer beware, seller beware
by anonymous 06/01/07 03:42 PM
It is a shame that a person who grows up and works around her parents real estate office, then becomes a licensed real estate agent hersel completely forgets all about ethics and morals.
by none 06/01/07 02:36 PM
Editor: You missed the real story.
by anynomous 06/01/07 02:23 PM
It is a shame that that the Jury never heard the testimony from another partner of Nickelson who testified to the judge that Nickelson physically abused them and coerced them as well. He has been doing this for almost a decade.
by SHELLY 06/01/07 01:43 PM
This is a scheme where 2nd mortgage never gets paid, bank forecloses and seizes property, buyer walks away with cash in pocket. All parties end up losers, buyer buys property under business or corporate name.
by flippingflops 06/01/07 01:03 PM
Is this the "buy properties with no money down" as seen on TV method? Does it have a pleabargaining chapter?
by Bill 06/01/07 12:17 PM
Trying to understand the extent Chadwick's loss. Get's cash, get's a 2nd mortgage lien. 1st mortgage forecloses, but that doesn't wipe out 2nd in a rising or stable market (ceteris paribus). What's the deal? Just opportunity and transaction costs?
by SHELLY 06/01/07 11:45 AM
I HOPE THE STATE OR COUNTIES CAN HELP THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LOST HOMES, MONEY. MY HEART GOES OUT TO THEM.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT