Video report
- For their own good
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
- More video reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Sure yard is bare, but there is a drought
In St. Petersburg, too little grass is a violation.
By MICHAEL KRUSE
Published June 1, 2007
|
Mitchell Bryant is one of the Lakewood Estates who received a code violation notice about his dead grass, as the city and the state is in the throes of a drought.
|
 |
|
[Times photo: Dirk Shadd]
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Times photo: Dirk Shadd]
Mitchell Bryant, 38, and his 2-year-old son Ellis pose in the front yard of their home in St. Petersburg. Bryant is among the scores of people around St. Pete who have been notified of code violations for not having adequate ground cover. Bryant says he's tried seeding a lawn. It failed. "There's just not enough water. Not now."
|
|
ST. PETERSBURG -- A city codes investigator recently drove through Lakewood Estates and decided to send violation notices to residents whose lawns had too little grass and too much "bare dirt." To which those folks replied: What? There's a drought on! Take Mitchell Bryant. The pastor of the Old Landmark Cathedral Church lives on Alcazar Way. His lawn looks ... thirsty. "You'd think they'd be more sensitive to the atmospheric conditions and hold off on the letters," he said one recent evening when a reporter knocked on his door. "I don't know what you're supposed to do. You're kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place." Or at least a dry place. Rainfall over the last year and a half is way below where it needs to be. One-day-a-week watering restrictions have been in effect since January. Some much-needed rain is forecast for this weekend, but that's probably not going to change the many spotty, dusty, decidedly un-green lawns not just in Lakewood Estates but across the region. St. Petersburg code compliance folks say they just want to help. "In a tough time like this, with the drought, we really, truly do try to work with residents," said Todd Yost, the assistant director at the city's code compliance assistance department. "But at the same time we want to try to figure out how to keep that dust down and cover that dirt. "There will not be a fine," he added. Yet. This doesn't appear to be happening anywhere else in the Tampa Bay area. There's no "bare dirt" code in Tampa. Or Clearwater. Or Hillsborough County. "I don't know how you could ever enforce something like that," said Dexter Barge, Hillsborough's director of code enforcement. "If your front yard is all dirt," Tampa code enforcement boss Curtis Lane said, "you won't get in trouble." The letter in St. Petersburg went out to a lot of people, and all over the city, not just Lakewood Estates, Yost said. It said things about "the conditions," "the health and safety of residents," and making "our neighborhoods nice places to live." It also referred to these "bare dirt areas" and cited Chapter 16, Sec. 16-1064 d (2). The code says the owners of one- and two-family properties must maintain a "herbaceous layer of sod" -- that means grass -- "or ground cover plant material." Decorative gravel? Not okay. Crushed stone? Also not okay. Bryant, the pastor, said that in the past year he planted some Bermuda grass and some winter rye. Didn't take. He even went to Home Depot and bought a fancy green seed spreader. "I tried," he said. "There's just not enough water. Not now." The reality is that most lawns in most cases should be able to survive even with just the once-a-week watering, said Angela Polo-Maraj, a landscape education specialist for the Southwest Florida Water Management District. The reasons for grass that's gone and not just brown, she said, probably have to do with more than just the current drought. Yost says all he's asking is that the folks who got these letters call the code people who sent them. A fine could come but only after "a very lengthy" process. "We're talking months," he said. At this point, he said, residents will get some literature about Xeriscaping. That's a term that comes from a Greek word that means dry. It's a landscaping method that uses trees and shrubs and different sorts of ground covers that don't need as much water. In the meantime, though, Bryant has another idea. The pastor's going to pray for rain. Times staff writers Mike Donila, Bill Varian and Janet Zink contributed to this report. Michael Kruse can be reached at mkruse@sptimes.com.
[Last modified June 1, 2007, 01:45:15]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Bob
|
06/04/07 06:59 AM
|
|
What happened to common sense...oh wait, this is florida we are talking about.
|
|
by Sal
|
06/01/07 07:03 PM
|
|
Same rules in the homeowners associations. It is unfair that we can't either not have lawn or water enough to keep it alive. The agriculture interests are allowed to water continuously and that is to make a profit for themselves. No justice!
|
|
by Jamie
|
06/01/07 06:20 PM
|
|
Could the city improve its enforcement, yes. That doesn't change the fact that this guy is in violation. Not everyone that breaks the speed limit gets caught, but those that do have to pay the penalty.
|
|
by Gilbert
|
06/01/07 05:51 PM
|
|
You are darn right Tim, this is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Obviously, common sense is not part of the litmus test for city employees. Nor is temperment.
|
|
by Joe
|
06/01/07 04:40 PM
|
|
Denise - sure, groundcover sounds great. Then you get torpedo grass or other pest weeds growing in between, and you get a code citation for that instead. Xeriscape isn't so easy to maintain.
|
|
by pete
|
06/01/07 04:26 PM
|
|
This is the last straw! The city needs to pay this man and other people in the same situation loosing the money spent on grass and take care of the lawn. They took away the OUR water and murdered the product this man paid good money for.
|
|
by Tim
|
06/01/07 03:10 PM
|
|
When officious city employees have time to tell others what to do about their private property, it is time for voters to tell the elected officials whether they still have a job or not.
|
|
by STPete
|
06/01/07 02:51 PM
|
|
The article fails to mention that a lack of ground cover causes dirt to run from the property, clogging the stormsewers & causing more expensive flooding. There R plenty of drought-tolerant ground covers that would solve this & save everyone $.
|
|
by sara
|
06/01/07 02:26 PM
|
|
I like what denise has to say about native plants. Any suggestions on which ones? Sounds like a great solution.
|
|
by Jason
|
06/01/07 02:16 PM
|
|
I would have to say that my lawn is not anywhere near his dirt and I never watered that much to begin with. Seems like that lawn was that way before the drought. The city should have cited him when it was raining.
|
|
by ms
|
06/01/07 02:14 PM
|
|
I love your question Mikey. I'm sure ole Joe is looking into it, watch out Mayor Baker.
|
|
by Monica
|
06/01/07 01:38 PM
|
|
Check with Florida Botannical Gardens in Largo....I put seedum ground cover in my yard 5 years ago and this works much better than grass in Florida. It becomes like a pathway and is low maintenance. Go check out the pathway at Florida Botannical!
|
|
by OL' VETERAN
|
06/01/07 01:28 PM
|
|
Wasn't Dennis Rader a code officer?
Hmmmmmm.
|
|
by Eric
|
06/01/07 01:09 PM
|
|
Unless your building something or have a space for rent codes generally only responds to complaints. If you get cited, odds are your neighbors are the reason why. They're telling you to stop being a slob.
|
|
by Dan
|
06/01/07 01:07 PM
|
|
Just by looking at the picture I see several other codes violations- he's lucky he was only cited for the yard. Frankly that yard looks like it had problems long before the drought. I'm glad I don't live next door.
|
|
by Denise
|
06/01/07 12:40 PM
|
|
Lawns dont work in drought areas. Xeriscape is easy-get free mulch from city or tree service. Native plants attract butterflies, grow without much watering, look pretty, smell good, less work than mowing, provide habitat for wildlife. Much better!
|
|
by Bob
|
06/01/07 12:13 PM
|
|
St Petersburg is run by idiots. Plain and simple. A drought is on and we have water restrictions! What the heck does the city expect??? Just a way for the city to keep it's inspectors busy and money rolling in!!
|
|
by Rob
|
06/01/07 12:08 PM
|
|
I live in holiday (Pasco) and I have nice white river rock covering my front yard. No watering required, no dirt showing and it looks beautiful. Why won't St. Pete allow this? It saves water and is very low maintenance!
|
|
by Carolyn
|
06/01/07 12:01 PM
|
|
Looks like Mr. Bryant did not water his lawn at all. I live in Lakewood, water once a week and have a green yard. Properties like Mr Bryant's bring down property value in Lakewood Estate.
|
|
by Dorine
|
06/01/07 11:56 AM
|
|
Once again code enforcement is exposed as the revenue collection tool that it really is. Does anyone think that if this article hadn't embarrassed them, Pastor Bryant wouldn't have received a nice big fine after the letter?
|
|
by sylvia
|
06/01/07 11:56 AM
|
|
are all the yards nearby barren,too?- or just mr. bryants? if most people can maintain some greenery,no matter how sparse,it follows that mr.bryant can, too.don't mow too short,use a mulcher,&your clippings will create soil.weeds are green!
|
|
by Nee
|
06/01/07 11:48 AM
|
|
I agree wtih Patrice, What do the code inspectors lawns look like? If green, they may be in violation. On the other hand if you move into deed-restricted subdivisions don't get mad when they enforce deeds.
|
|
by MICHELLE
|
06/01/07 11:35 AM
|
|
MAYBE THEY SHOULD JUST TELL THIS HOME OWNER TO DO A RAIN DANCE OUT IN HIS LAWN AND SEE IF IT RAINS SO THE GRASS WILL GROW!! NO RAINS = NO GREEN GRASS. TELL THE CODE INSPECTORS TO COME BACK AFTER WE GET SOME RAIN!!
|
|
by RIchard
|
06/01/07 11:22 AM
|
|
I agree, grass doesn't grow on sand. But dirt is cheaper than sod. Mix it with the sand and then the weeds will grow! Now you have an herbaceous layer of sod.
|
|
by mikey
|
06/01/07 11:14 AM
|
|
Does Joe Waller know about this persecution??
|
|
by mikey
|
06/01/07 11:10 AM
|
|
Code inspectors make little money. Their only perk is "power" over people. This sounds like an example of that. A little research would show that the inspectors friends in the area probably received no warning. Another example of a poorly run City!!
|
|
by Barbara
|
06/01/07 10:47 AM
|
|
Forget the developers and start concentrating on the community of people who are already here and the problems that we face. Stop the harrasment and start concentrating on workable sane solutions.
|
|
by Barbara
|
06/01/07 10:45 AM
|
|
Once again the city of St. Pete is out of control. This happened with the police attacking the homeless and now code enforcement attacking homeowners. Come on Mayor Baker, how about some leadership where it counts!
|
|
by humph
|
06/01/07 10:38 AM
|
|
I fully agree with Barry,the 2nd poster.I would LOVE to have reclaimed water,but Medowlawn was obvioulsy overlooked.Hook-up should be mandatory for the entire city,leaving the potable water for DRINKING!
|
|
by John
|
06/01/07 10:20 AM
|
|
You better water them yards, or you may have a lien placed upon your property for failing to follow the Lakewood Estate code.
|
|
by Elston
|
06/01/07 10:04 AM
|
|
So if the city's so upset about dust and dirt, they should finish paving the damn alleyways. Hypocrites.
|
|
by To Sarah
|
06/01/07 10:02 AM
|
|
You forgot to mention that half the time when we're allowed to use our reclaimed, there's not enough pressure to even pop the sprinklers. My lawn is crispy. Build, build, build! What happened to the moratorium on adding new reclaimed hookups?
|
|
by GrimReaper
|
06/01/07 09:56 AM
|
|
Tuesday June 5 2007 the City of St. Petersburg issued Mitchell Bryant a citation for allowing his grass to regrow too fast. WANA BET this could happen ?
|
|
by Sarah
|
06/01/07 09:34 AM
|
|
We were sold reclaimed water with the promise of unlimited water, one fee. Now we have once a week watering AND the fee has increased. We were sold a bill of goods - AGAIN!
|
|
by Dennis
|
06/01/07 09:32 AM
|
|
Instead of just providing these poor residents with "literature about Xeriscaping", how about REQUIRING xeriscaping prior to approving any new developments? No more HOAs requiring golf-course lawns. No new permits unless xeriscaping is tied to them
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|