Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
EPA issues new water rules
Some streams and wetlands might lose Clean Water Act protection.
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published June 6, 2007
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration made it harder Tuesday for nonpermanent streams and nearby wetlands to be protected under the federal Clean Water Act. The new guidance issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers requires that for such waters to be protected, there must be a "significant nexus" shown between the intermittent stream or wetland and a traditional waterway. And the guidance says a determination will be made case by case, analyzing flow and other issues. Environmentalist argued that would negate the broader regional importance of many such waterways in the aggregate on water bodies downstream. Assistant EPA administrator Benjamin Grumbles said the new guidance to regional offices and officials "sends a clear signal we'll use our regulatory tools" to meet President Bush's promise of no net loss of wetlands. He said it "maintains the Bush administration's strong commitment to wetlands conservation." John Paul Woodley Jr., the assistant Army secretary who oversees the Corps of Engineers, said the policy "will foster ... predictability and consistency" in determining whether a permit should be issued to conduct activities in an intermittent tributary or adjacent wetland. Grumbles said the new guidance conforms with a ruling by the Supreme Court a year ago. A divided court said that while the government can block development in a wetland, even miles from a traditional waterway, it can do so only if there is a significant connection shown with the waterway. Environmentalists said the new rules will put in jeopardy many of the intermittent streams and headwaters that now fall under the Clean Water Act and result in less protection of wetlands.
[Last modified June 6, 2007, 00:42:01]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Lazar
|
06/06/07 10:59 AM
|
|
It is a pleasure to see reasonable rulemaking and guidance from the EPA. Making wetland decisions on a case by case basis makes more sense than applying broad gestapo tactics that do not benefit anyone or anything except the environmentalist fringe.
|
|
by Susan
|
06/06/07 08:41 AM
|
|
Intermittent flooding means IT STILL FLOODS. Many wetland areas are seasonal by nature. These people our out of it.
|
|