St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

EPA issues new water rules

Some streams and wetlands might lose Clean Water Act protection.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published June 6, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration made it harder Tuesday for nonpermanent streams and nearby wetlands to be protected under the federal Clean Water Act.

The new guidance issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers requires that for such waters to be protected, there must be a "significant nexus" shown between the intermittent stream or wetland and a traditional waterway.

And the guidance says a determination will be made case by case, analyzing flow and other issues. Environmentalist argued that would negate the broader regional importance of many such waterways in the aggregate on water bodies downstream.

Assistant EPA administrator Benjamin Grumbles said the new guidance to regional offices and officials "sends a clear signal we'll use our regulatory tools" to meet President Bush's promise of no net loss of wetlands. He said it "maintains the Bush administration's strong commitment to wetlands conservation."

John Paul Woodley Jr., the assistant Army secretary who oversees the Corps of Engineers, said the policy "will foster ... predictability and consistency" in determining whether a permit should be issued to conduct activities in an intermittent tributary or adjacent wetland.

Grumbles said the new guidance conforms with a ruling by the Supreme Court a year ago. A divided court said that while the government can block development in a wetland, even miles from a traditional waterway, it can do so only if there is a significant connection shown with the waterway.

Environmentalists said the new rules will put in jeopardy many of the intermittent streams and headwaters that now fall under the Clean Water Act and result in less protection of wetlands.

[Last modified June 6, 2007, 00:42:01]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Lazar 06/06/07 10:59 AM
It is a pleasure to see reasonable rulemaking and guidance from the EPA. Making wetland decisions on a case by case basis makes more sense than applying broad gestapo tactics that do not benefit anyone or anything except the environmentalist fringe.
by Susan 06/06/07 08:41 AM
Intermittent flooding means IT STILL FLOODS. Many wetland areas are seasonal by nature. These people our out of it.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT