Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Tobacco marketed to blacks
A lawsuit seeks more than $1-billion in damages.
By Helen Huntley, Times Staff Writer
Published June 7, 2007
Tobacco companies targeted African-Americans with sophisticated marketing aimed at getting them hooked on cigarettes and eventually killing them, says a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The marketing was "meticulously planned and executed with clear racist intent," says the suit filed by Miami lawyer J.B. Harris on behalf of African-American Gloria Tucker, of Coral Springs, representing the estates of her grandmother and mother. Annie Mae Swain, 80, died in 1994, and Dorothy Oliver, 72, died in 2000 of acute cardiopulmonary failure and other cardiovascular problems. Both lived in Broward County. The suit asks for more than $1-billion in damages from tobacco companies Philip Morris USA, Lorillard Tobacco, R.J. Reynolds and Liggett Group. The suit says the companies' targeted marketing included billboards in African-American neighborhoods, sponsorships of sporting events, endorsement deals with African-American celebrities and saturation ad campaigns in publications such as Ebony, Jet and Essence. Cigarette brands were even created specifically for the African-American market, including the "X" cigarette from Philip Morris and the "Uptown" from R.J. Reynolds. Both brands were later withdrawn. The Uptown was sold in packs of 10 and had higher tar and nicotine levels. Harris said that comedian Jay Leno once joked that R.J. Reynolds chose the "Uptown" name "because the word 'genocide' was already taken." The suit says the companies sold cigarettes with "complete and utter disregard for health and human safety, and in a systematic and deliberate manner meant to addict and ultimately kill as many smokers as possible, especially African-Americans." Wednesday's lawsuit is among what is expected to become a torrent of cases filed as offshoots of a 1994 tobacco lawsuit known as the Engle case. In rulings this past July and December, the Florida Supreme Court upheld lower-court findings that tobacco companies were guilty of fraud and negligence, and that smoking causes certain illnesses, including various types of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. However, the court said members of the class defined in the suit would have to file individual claims instead of being treated as a group. The class covers smokers diagnosed no later than Nov. 21, 1996, with one of the medical conditions listed in the lawsuit. Many Florida lawyers are gearing up to file cases, said Edward Sweda, senior attorney for the Tobacco Products Liability Project, part of the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University in Boston. Sweda said 60 to 70 lawyers attended a seminar the project sponsored in Miami in February on "how to try and win tobacco cases." Harris was one of the speakers. Philip Morris was the only tobacco company defendant to respond to the Times' request for comment. The company said it considered it premature to respond to any lawsuits filed as offshoots of the Engle case because it is seeking further review of the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. "However," the company stated, "if any individual cases do proceed, the company intends to vigorously defend them." Fast Facts: Targeted marketing The lawsuit quotes from what it identified as tobacco company memos and research reports on marketing to African-Americans: - "The brand's support must be seen as authentic and as being backed by other blacks - not as a big white company's tactic to sell to blacks." (from R.J. Reynolds' plan for marketing Salem cigarettes that included distributing free samples at night clubs, football games, concerts, traffic court and churches) - "This brand will leverage the black consumers' desire to use products which are distinctive and are associated primarily with blacks, and are more 'potent' (e.g., blacks drink malt liquor rather than beer.) ... Blacks are less concerned with tar and nicotine levels." (from R.J. Reynolds' plan for marketing Uptown cigarettes) - "Recommend that we introduce KOOL Ten's in black, low income and other value conscious neighborhoods and possibly college towns." (from Brown & Williamson's plan for marketing Kool cigarettes) Helen Huntley can be reached at hhuntley@sptimes.com or (727) 893-8230.
[Last modified June 6, 2007, 22:55:58]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Sara
|
06/08/07 08:42 AM
|
|
Oh please. If I eat crappy food I'll have a heart attack, if I smoke, I could get lung cancer. I know all this stuff, I take responsibility for my actions. I'm sick and tired of stories like this one.
|
|
by Jayson
|
06/07/07 05:19 PM
|
|
The ladies in hte case were both in their 70s & 80s, that mean that when they were hooked, cigarette makers claimed that they were health and not dangerous.
|
|
by Bill
|
06/07/07 03:31 PM
|
|
I used to smoke Newports. All this time I thought I was a white guy. Now I know how they got me. Damn those tobacco pushers!
|
|
by Dave
|
06/07/07 10:38 AM
|
|
I am sick of this racist crap. Cigarets are bad for you and everyone knows that. It is your decision weather to smoke or not. All they do is market to demographics such as teens, college students, and ect.. I have to agree with J he says it all.
|
|
by Diane
|
06/07/07 09:10 AM
|
|
Did they have to make this a black thing too? My uncle burned himself up in a chair when I was little. I wish my mom and I could both quit. They are killing thousands of all colors. They target kids too, ya know!
|
|
by Dorees
|
06/07/07 08:56 AM
|
|
If you are told a product is okay then you will use it. Consumers were lied to for decades and became addicted smokers. The industry added ammonia because it makes the nicotine more addictive. If you choose to smoke now then its your fault.
|
|
by Dorees
|
06/07/07 08:53 AM
|
|
No one was aware that nicotine was addictive accept the tobacco industry and the scientist who tested cigarettes.It wasn't until the states sued the tobacco industry back in 1997 that the tobacco industry admitted that they had lied for decades.
|
|
by Eugene
|
06/07/07 07:06 AM
|
|
As a 53 year old white ex smoker of 30 years, I only have myself to blame for making the dumb decision to smoke. People need to take responsibility for their actions and decisions regardless of what the money hungry lawyers tell us.
|
|
by Paul
|
06/07/07 06:16 AM
|
|
Here we go again, racist this, racist that. Its called targeted marketing. You go after a specific demographic and appeal to them. Duh! Its called personal responsibility. What, you aren't aware cigarettes are bad for you? How stupid can you be?
|
|
by J
|
06/07/07 05:59 AM
|
|
I have heard it all now!! The "Race Card" and cigarettes. I think all cowboys should sue Marlboro, what do you think?
|
|