Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Guest Column
Tax cuts bring relief, not crisis
By PETER NEHR
Published June 7, 2007
As a former Tarpon Springs city commissioner, I can understand why local governments are concerned about the possible cuts to their budgets. There are more than 30 other state legislators who have former local government experience, and to say that we in the state government do not understand local budgets is just not true. What is true, however, is that our state is facing an economic crisis and Floridians need immediate tax relief. At the meetings I and other legislators have hosted recently, hardly anyone believed that trimming the fat at the local government level will have the safety impacts local governments are threatening. When families have to trim their budgets at home, they do not start with baby formula, utilities and other necessities. They start with luxuries. I am asking local government to do the same. No responsible local government will put people in danger by cutting essential services like fire, police and ambulances first. While it is true that some counties have reduced their tax millage rate slightly, they have also greatly increased their revenues based on the rising value of home and business properties. The net result has been massive property tax increases. People need to know that in the last five years, local governments have increased their property tax revenues almost 84 percent. Since the year 2000, that increase was almost 100 percent. And if you go back to 1996, local government property tax revenue has increased by 148 percent. Florida taxpayers are being taxed many billions of dollars more than they can afford to pay and if this continues, Florida will start to experience the stoppage of job creation and economic growth. Right now more people are leaving our state than moving to our state. The Legislature gives Floridians a lot more credit than their local governments do. I believe that taxes for Florida property owners are too high, have grown too fast and are endangering families, businesses and our state's economic well being. I believe that property tax relief is not only possible but necessary. The important question taxpayers should be asking themselves is what would the local governments have done if the real estate market had not boomed and given them all that extra money to increase their budgets? Could they have survived? The answer is of course they would have and they will again. Here is what I and the Legislature propose as possible solutions: - Cities and counties should be required to cut their property taxes and the level of these cuts should be based on a formula tied to their past taxing performance. This will be more fair to those local governments that have been good stewards of your tax dollars and have made significant cuts to their budgets in the past. - There should be a statutory cap on future property taxes to ensure that governments cannot grow faster than your personal income. - Every category of property taxpayers, including businesses, should benefit from the mandatory tax cut and statutory cap. - Save Our Homes and the homestead exemption should be replaced with a new super homestead exemption based on the value of the homesteaded property. This plan will significantly cut property taxes for most. I would value any suggestions you have that would yield meaningful results for all the people of Florida. Peter Nehr of Tarpon Springs is a freshman member of the state House of Representatives. He can be reached at peter.nehr@myfloridahouse.gov.
[Last modified June 7, 2007, 00:03:33]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Bill
|
06/08/07 09:57 AM
|
|
Inconvenient Truth has it right. Roll back the RLE formula and cut state budget an equivalent way so schools aren't punished. Legislators think citizens won't figure this out, but they are more responsible for tax increases via RLE than local gov'ts.
|
|
by bob
|
06/07/07 02:26 PM
|
|
Nehr has no idea about how to address tje "proportial relief" to non homestedded property owners that is so badly needed.
|
|
by TC
|
06/07/07 11:15 AM
|
|
So then the FL population as not increased since 1996 and service demands are the same? How is the state cutting its own fat? 0.6% cut by Crist is not enough. It's easy for you to cut the taxes of local governments and not lead by example.
|
|
by Dee
|
06/07/07 11:13 AM
|
|
The school districts have also benefited from the increased revenue so they should also be subject to cutting the fat starting with top-heavy administration.
|
|
by Bland
|
06/07/07 09:04 AM
|
|
Rep Nehr, you get it. We do not have a tax problem, we have a spending growth problem. You can not spend/tax at a greater growth rate than personal income. Local government spent at too grate a rate. We need to elect new tax cutting leaders.
|
|
by Inconvenient Truth
|
06/07/07 07:50 AM
|
|
Rep Nehr - you just raised property taxes by $550 million through the required local effort for schools. It's hypocritical of you to slam local governments on the one hand, while you are raising property taxes at the same time.
|
|
by Lawrence
|
06/07/07 06:57 AM
|
|
Roll back salaries and benefits to 2001 levels and then adjust for inflation. The whole "keep our pay and perks, cut your services" shtick is going to bite you guys at the next election! Mark my words....
|
|