Special report
The surrogate
It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
- More special reports
Video report
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
- More video reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
A tax plan with specifics
Legislators propose rollbacks and expanded exemptions.
By ALEX LEARY and JENNIFER LIBERTO
Published June 9, 2007
TALLAHASSEE -- Top lawmakers proposed the largest tax cut in Florida history Friday, a sprawling $31.6-billion plan that would trim the average bill by 7 percent this year and give homeowners significantly lower taxes in future years. The five-year plan -- a blueprint for the special session that begins Tuesday -- was released just before 6 p.m. as a blizzard of numbers that seemed more reasonable than many had expected. "You always fear the worst, but I'm pleasantly surprised and optimistic," said Pinellas County Commissioner Susan Latvala, who as president of the Florida Association of Counties has been a leading voice against drastic tax reductions. "I think they listened to us, and they realize local governments provide vital services," she said. The plan has two major components. One is a rollback of tax revenues for local governments, and the other is a sharp expansion of the state's homestead exemption. The two pieces represent a hard-fought compromise between Senate President Ken Pruitt, who wanted to cut taxes more modestly, and House Speaker Marco Rubio, who wanted to swing a meat cleaver. Gov. Charlie Crist praised the effort. "It's looking very good to me," said Crist, who had earlier called for about $30-billion in cuts. "I'm very pleased and very grateful." But the early optimism did not mask a concern, especially among business owners, that the plan is designed to give the biggest cuts to homesteaded property owners, who already enjoy exemptions under the current system. It was commercial landowners, snowbirds and landlords who cried the loudest last summer for a break in property taxes because their bills have risen fastest. Yet, almost two-thirds of the new savings go to homesteaders. "It seems that the leadership in Tallahassee is unable to grasp a simple principle," said 60-year-old Marty Altner of Clearwater, a landlord and tax reform advocate. "An EMS worker helps someone who is bleeding to death before someone with a flesh wound. It's idiocy." And there were new fears Friday about cuts to local school budgets. While Pruitt and Rubio pledged to hold schools harmless in the tax deal, the proposal would cut school budgets by $7.1-billion over the next five years. Lawmakers will have to find a way to replace that money. "This is very unsettling and gives us a queasy feeling," said Mark Pudlow, spokesman for the Florida Education Association. "It's kind of 'trust us' deal." - - - The biggest challenge politically will be winning approval in the Legislature for the new "super" homestead exemption. Tinkering with the homestead exemption, available only to primary residences, means changing the state Constitution. That requires a three-fourths majority in the House and Senate, plus voter approval. Under the proposal released Friday, the current $25,000 flat exemption would be replaced by a system that provides a 75 percent exemption on the first $200,000 in home value. The next $300,000 would get an additional 15 percent exemption. So a home valued at $400,000 would be taxed on only $220,000. A minimum exemption of $50,000 would be guaranteed. Longtime homeowners who already have especially low tax bills because of the Save Our Homes cap on annual assessments would be allowed to keep their existing tax bill. But passage is hardly a done deal. If lawmakers can agree during the special session, the proposal must still get 60 percent approval in a statewide referendum, tentatively scheduled for Jan. 29, the day of the presidential primary. The heavy focus on homestead property owners could give rise to opposition from business groups who feel slighted. Aside from the local government rollback, businesses get relatively few benefits, including an exemption of $25, 000 in taxes on equipment. The local government tax rate rollback will be easier to enact because it requires only a straight majority vote of the Legislature before being sent to the governor. Under the proposal, property tax revenues for city and county budgets for the coming fiscal year 2007-2008, which begins Oct. 1, would freeze at the current year's level. Each local government would also have to make additional cuts to their property tax revenues of either 3, 5, 7 or 9 percent, depending on how much they had raised taxes between 2001 and 2006. The rollback plan would generate an average saving for all property owners of about 6 or 7 percent in the first year. Future tax revenue growth would be capped by the rate of personal income growth and population in a city or county. City and county elected officials could break the limitations through a supermajority vote. While supporting the homestead exemptions, Democrats said the plan could still be doomed if the school budget problem isn't fixed. "Now the state is going to step in and do the right thing?" asked Rep. Jack Seiler of Wilton Manors. "You're asking the taxpayers to take a leap of faith." Times staff writers Steve Bousquet and Will Van Sant contributed to this report. Fast facts: Homestead expansion Lawmakers are proposing a new "super" homestead exemption. Here's how it would work: - Primary homes would get a tax exemption of 75 percent of the first $200,000 of the home's value, with a minimum exemption of $50,000.
- The next $300,000 in value will get an additional 15 percent exemption.
- Other details: homeowners whose tax bills are lower under the existing Save Our Homes program would be "grandfathered in" to keep the lower tax bill.
Fast facts: Proposed rollbacks Lawmakers propose creating a five-tier system for rolling back city and county government budgets that follows a basic principle: The more a local government allowed taxes to rise with property values between 2001 and 2006, the steeper the rollback. Here's where local counties and cities would fare: 0 percent rollback: St. Leo, Belleair Shore and Temple Terrace 3 percent rollback: Pasco County and Safety Harbor 5 percent rollback: Hillsborough County, Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole, Plant City, Tampa, Pinellas Park, St. Petersburg, Tarpon Springs and Belleair 7 percent rollback: Pinellas County, South Pasadena, Kenneth City Dunedin, Port Richey, Clearwater and Oldsmar 9 percent rollback: Hernando County, Belleair Bluffs, San Antonio, Gulfport, St. Pete Beach, North Redington Beach, Belleair Beach, Largo, Madeira Beach, Treasure Island, Redington Beach, Redington Shores, Indian Shores and Weeki Wachee
[Last modified June 8, 2007, 23:45:57]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Kim
|
01/28/08 11:25 PM
|
|
Get rid of property taxes and go to a state sales tax. That way everyone will pay for schools and hospitals. Renters with kids pay nothing now, yet they still buy big screen tv's and expensive tennis shoes. Let them pay into the system.
|
|
by Larry
|
07/15/07 10:30 AM
|
|
The way property values have risen in the past 3 yrs, how long before a $200,000.00 home reaches $300,000.00 or $400,000.00 After that when the home stead ex. is phased out, will tax percentages increase enormously each year and taxes sore again???
|
|
by Jay
|
06/21/07 11:09 AM
|
|
Get rid of the subjective assessors office. Tax only on sq ft of property. Would be very fair to everyone. divide aggregate revenue by the aggregate sq footage to get tax rate. simple and fair.
|
|
by Julie
|
06/20/07 02:39 PM
|
|
Roll back taxes, but it doesn't have to effect the police, fire and schools. that's just a scare tactic Democrates use to stop the roll back.
|
|
by bill
|
06/16/07 07:41 AM
|
|
why on a 200000 home in your formula are you adding 50000 at step 3 the tax bill simply states 75 percent of the first 200000 and 15 percent of the remainder over 200000 adding those two numbers together should be the new taxable value i do not see
|
|
by leo
|
06/13/07 11:46 AM
|
|
what is the proposed cut for commercial property?
|
|
by John
|
06/13/07 03:11 AM
|
|
Yea, but doesn't UK have a huge sales tax?
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
06/12/07 09:57 PM
|
|
I have nothing against rolling back the millage rates as I have said in other blogs. That would keep the proportion paid by everyone the same, just less tax overall. The wealthy want more, though -they want a tax break on their investment properties.
|
|
by Stewart
|
06/12/07 02:57 PM
|
|
My UK house is >twice the size of FL condo (owned for >10years)yet I pay much lower property taxes on it.I don't mind higher taxes for non residents but I object to tax gouging.Just look at construction & job losses to see what it really costs FL
|
|
by WILLIAM
|
06/12/07 11:32 AM
|
|
AS A RESIDENT OF FLORIDA SINCE 1947 I SEE NO REASON TO VOTE FOR RELIEF FOR PART TIME REIDENTS. THEY USE OUR RESOURCES PAY TAX ON PURCHASES MADE IN FOUR TO SIX MONTHS AND HAVE THE USE OF OUR POLICE, FIRE, UTILITIES, ETC. YEAR ROUND. VOTE NO.
|
|
by jim
|
06/11/07 12:21 PM
|
|
how about lee county rollback which has seen large increases the last 5 years
|
|
by Roberta
|
06/11/07 11:25 AM
|
|
I just think all of this is interesting considering it seems to have come to a head after the abolition of the intangibles tax. I'm just curious what that tax went to pay for. Does anyone know?
|
|
by Gary
|
06/11/07 11:12 AM
|
|
Actually Joshu, by failing to rollback the millage rate when values go up, local govts ARE raising taxes. It's in statutes. While I agree that snowbirds knew what they were getting into, it's not fair or equitable. Save Our Homes created a mess!
|
|
by Terryl
|
06/11/07 11:03 AM
|
|
Why not charge 2nd and 3rd car owners 2 to 3 times the cost to licenses those cars. After all, if they can afford a 2nd or 3rd car they can afford the higher taxes. It makes as much sense as the current home taxes.
|
|
by David
|
06/10/07 09:27 PM
|
|
Only in Florida can the legislature tweak a pork barrel. The word is getting out to the other 49 states.
|
|
by Cracky
|
06/10/07 09:22 PM
|
|
Florida wants to increase the disproportionate tax burden on the backs of non residents. A non resident is defined as someone who can't vote and doesn't have any children using Florida's educational system.
|
|
by Maureen
|
06/10/07 08:18 PM
|
|
Your article doesn't mention the percentage rollback for Citru County or Crystal River. What are they?
|
|
by Ron
|
06/10/07 03:45 PM
|
|
What will happen to the mil rate as government feels they aren't getting enough revenue under this plan? Forget snowbirds, this has everything to do with people who bought homes in the last 3yrs. and being locked into your current home.
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
06/10/07 02:15 PM
|
|
Yes, I can see what the real estate market has done for our state. Northerners gobbled up all the properties as investments and created this crisis for homeowners and renters - and now they want a bailout.
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
06/10/07 02:12 PM
|
|
Let's quit using the term "snowbird" and address the issue properly. Tourists enjoy FL and pay sales tax only -good! Investors, vacation homers, flippers fuel developers and ruin the state for residnts and tourists -bad. No tax break for the latter!
|
|
by David
|
06/10/07 11:00 AM
|
|
The unmitigated gall, The Florida House and Senate have completed abandoned the voters in the state, by turning a deaf ear. All The forums, special tax meetings were nothing but a complete sham. 3-9 percent, a slap on the wrist to local governments
|
|
by NAL
|
06/10/07 10:43 AM
|
|
The state must end allowing school districts to have special referendems to approve higher or lower questions to increse the mill rate lasting 4-years. In Pinellas [1/2 mill] and Sarasota [1.00] (maybe others) have done this....and this must STO
|
|
by Norm
|
06/10/07 10:36 AM
|
|
CUT THE LOCAL SCHOOL TAXES THAT COMPRISE NEAR OR OVER 50% OF OUR LOCAL YEALY TAX BILLS!!!! IT IS TIME, LONG OVERDUE, TO CONTROL SCHOOL DISTRICT SPENDING, THEIR HIGH SALARIES, CONTROL THEIR BUDGETS, AND SO ON!THIS MUST BE PART OF THE STATE REFORMS!
|
|
by Barb
|
06/10/07 10:19 AM
|
|
GET INVOLVED--- http://propertytaxreformnow.com/
|
|
by Connie
|
06/10/07 01:20 AM
|
|
Keep taxing the folks from up north and you'll have a rude awakening when they stop coming to FL - you'll see how much they mean to your economy & real estate. Prepare for the bottom to fall out.
|
|
by Marc
|
06/10/07 01:16 AM
|
|
If Florida continues to balance it's budgte on the backs of snowbirds, there will be fewer and fewer each year and it will surely have a massive negative impact on FL's economy. It will further erode real estate values.
|
|
by JP
|
06/10/07 12:32 AM
|
|
Hurry up already! I just bought a house and the taxes will quintuple in JANUARY. Meanwhile, my neighbors will be paying $5k less than I am for the same size house PER YEAR! MADNESS!
|
|
by Sad
|
06/10/07 12:01 AM
|
|
You wanted dog parks,skate parks,after school programs, fireworks, park programs. Stop asking for extras,costs go down. Have kids? Entertain them yourselves. Have a dog? Walk it yourself. State gov set cop/firepensions.Hatelocal? Call state whenmuged
|
|
by James
|
06/09/07 11:04 PM
|
|
Can someone at the Times please do a story on what all this extra tax revenue is being spent on? 80% and sometimes more increase in revnue and they've spent every penny of it, so that services will have to be cut, because of a 9% rollback? How!?
|
|
by James
|
06/09/07 10:59 PM
|
|
Can't understand how they can collect 80% more in revenue and then threaten to cut services on a 9% roll back. Count me in on the CITIZEN INITIATIVE PLAN.
|
|
by Arlene
|
06/09/07 10:40 PM
|
|
Real estate values are falling like a rock.People cannot sell their properties. Rents are rising beyond what people can pay,tourism is being destroyed, yet when the state is near tax revolt,legislators do not listen. Snowbirds scream,rightfully so!
|
|
by Jared
|
06/09/07 10:10 PM
|
|
Jack and Jill live next door to each other. Jack bought before Jill, therefore Jack should pay less in taxes. After all, he does have neighborhood seniority. Sounds logical, right? Fix the STRUCTURE and stop the patchwork!
|
|
by Marie
|
06/09/07 09:55 PM
|
|
If Rep. Jack Seiler suggested replacing the State mandated portion of school taxes with a 1% increase in the sales tax rate we should elect him to run for Florida's governor. Let's wake up to what is fair for all property owners.
|
|
by Neal
|
06/09/07 09:53 PM
|
|
John, Where do I get the Citizens Initiative, It's time to vote all these bozos out - my next vote is going to be against every incumbent
What a joke! These greedy politicians got a 50% rise in their budgets and now dont want to give a cent back to u
|
|
by Joe
|
06/09/07 08:22 PM
|
|
When's the next election? All I know is if the word incumbant is by the name I'm voting for the other candidate. Join me in displacing all of these two faced liars, especially Charlie Crist.
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|