St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Tax ax would rip child safety net

Pinellas' Juvenile Welfare Board fears it will lose $19-million and need to cut more than 50 nonprofits.

By JOSE CARDENAS
Published June 10, 2007


Ten-year-old Sir Richard Evans of St. Petersburg plays his best hand Wednesday while attending a summer camp for children with visual disabilities at the Lighthouse of Pinellas in Pinellas Park. At The Juvenile Welfare Board one of Floridas 11 special districts received 64 million last year which it used to fund programs for children.
photo
[Douglas R. Clifford Times]
ADVERTISEMENT

If the Legislature opts for the biggest property tax rollback proposed so far, cities and counties wouldn't be the only ones hit, child welfare advocates say.

In Pinellas County, officials say programs for about 19, 000 needy children would face deep cuts.

Neighborhood family centers in poor areas would be threatened. Mental health services for children would be jeopardized.

That's because the Juvenile Welfare Board of Pinellas County could lose a third of its current budget of $62-million if property values were rolled back to 2001 levels, as some lawmakers propose.

The board was created by Pinellas voters in 1946 to support programs that benefit needy children. More than 93 percent of its budget comes from property taxes.

In response to a tax rollback, officials say, the board would have to cut funding to more than 50 nonprofit organizations in a worst-case scenario.

"It's going to take away the safety net for a lot of people, " said Dianne Clarke, chief operating officer at Operation PAR. "It puts families a lot closer to not being able to make it."

Operation PAR could lose 65 employees who help provide drug counseling and other programs to 30, 000 people, including children.

In setting priorities if cuts are made, Juvenile Welfare Board executive director Gay Lancaster said her agency chose to continue supporting child care, programs for middle-schoolers, programs that target child maltreatment and a few other "safety net programs" such as services to homeless children.

Of lesser priority are programs that are not as necessary to keep children safe or to help at-risk students.

Programs that could be cut include "neighborhood family centers" in poor neighborhoods such as Lealman and Campbell Park.

Mental health services would be gone, Lancaster said. Behavioral evaluations of juveniles charged with crimes at the courthouse would not be done.

The Juvenile Welfare Board staff consists of 60 positions, five of which are vacant and have been frozen. The board has added just one staff member in the past decade.

"The majority of our money ... is our services to children and families, " said Lisa Sahulka, the Juvenile Welfare Board's director of programs and finance. "That is the only place that we can cut."

Eye on special session

For now, board staffers don't know yet how much of a cut to expect. Nobody does.

With this week's special session on tax reform in Tallahassee looming, legislators have cities, counties and special taxing districts in the dark on the specifics of plans.

In recent days, the Senate president and House speaker have generally agreed to a broad framework for tax relief. It would include a rollback of local tax rates benefiting all property owners and a longer-term plan to ask voters in 2008 to create a super homestead exemption in lieu of the Save Our Homes 3 percent cap on assessments for homesteaded properties.

But child welfare officials worry that their programs could be newly vulnerable during this week's special session.

That's because city and county governments were the primary targets for property tax revenue reductions during this spring's regular legislative session. Special taxing districts such as hospital and fire districts also faced cuts on and off during the regular session.

But the Juvenile Welfare Board and 12 other "children's service councils" statewide had been exempt - at least in the proposal by the House. Collectively, the special taxing districts that support the councils raised about $500-million in property taxes last year.

But in the special session, the children's service councils are also subject to cuts.

To prepare, the Juvenile Welfare Board has calculated its potential cutbacks based on the harshest proposal so far mentioned - a rollback of property values to 2001 levels, which was promoted by the House in the regular session.

Under that scenario, the board would take in $19-million less in property tax revenues. That would force it to cut a third of the nonprofits from its portfolio.

"This is a very difficult thing that the Juvenile Welfare Board is having to go through, " said Dan Mann, president and chief executive officer of Lighthouse of Pinellas in Largo, whose funding for programs for blind children would be cut. "They know they are affecting lives."

Rolling back property tax assessments to 2003 or 2005 levels, both of which have been discussed, would leave local officials more money.

Also, a letter circulated by Senate president Ken Pruitt says reductions for special districts are still under discussion.

"They did say on Monday there would be special treatment for special districts, " said Kriss Vallesse, communications director for the Florida Children Services Council. The cuts "may not be as severe or as deep."

Just 3 percent

Of all the property taxes levied by various taxing entities in Pinellas, the Juvenile Welfare Board's budget accounts for only 3 percent of the total raised, Lancaster said.

"Our contention has always been that voters in 1946 saw the wisdom of instituting the Juvenile Welfare Board, " Lancaster said. "We're not quite sure why that should be tinkered with."

Jose Cardenas can be reached at jcardenas@sptimes.com or 445-4224.

[Last modified June 9, 2007, 20:56:28]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Celeste 06/12/07 11:33 AM
I raised a special needs child and NEVER asked for taxpayers to pay for more than what any other child would receive. We all must take care of our children, not the gov't. Even whole healthy children are neglected because of bad parents. Lower taxes.
by Concerned Citizen 06/11/07 05:52 PM
As everyone is selfish of THEIR needs and wants, I am concerned that these needs won't be met. Our future starts now people!!!
by Barbara 06/11/07 02:43 PM
Mike, you're sick. It may be your money you'll be parting with it one way or another: Maybe when the needy kids turn into drug addicted theives because they didn't have the support they needed when it really mattered.
by Paul 06/11/07 11:25 AM
The sky is falling, children will go hungry and barefoot, we're all doomed. Jeeesh, everyone seemed just fine before this run up in property taxes, why is it that the govt needs to spend all this money? We'll be just fine.
by John 06/11/07 09:59 AM
Cut out the pork instead of programs that make a difference. This sounds like a scare tactic being used to influence people on how much they really need our tax dollars. What about the $146 million tax surplus? Our local government is a joke.
by Cindy 06/11/07 07:46 AM
I wonder what their budget was in 2001? How many employees did they have then? Pinellas population has barely increased since then. Just more trying to scare us.
by Marty S. 06/11/07 06:46 AM
Unfortunately the 'safety net' has become a hammock for too many folks. Just another example of reckless liberal spending. Its time to pay the piper!
by Sasha 06/11/07 05:58 AM
Time to cut the waste out of government. There is plenty of money in the budget. Time to cut the waste from top down if you want all these programs to remain. Stop grabbing for the tax money without first cutting the fat from these programs.
by sylvia 06/10/07 12:59 PM
of course programs for children will be cut.kids don't vote, do they? if we ned to curtail spending, lets yank funding from those empty buses i see all over. we need a revamp of transport services to serve riders.not just more $ thrown at it.
by John 06/10/07 12:21 PM
Cut salaries to overpaid government employees (how many 100K a yr deputy mayors do we need anyway?) or cut funds to needy kids? Seems like an easy decision to me.
by DR 06/10/07 09:33 AM
I think if we help children when they are younger, we have a better chance of keeping them out of the system when they are older. Lets look at lowering these out of control insurance rates and keep the kids programs
by mike 06/10/07 05:07 AM
Hey, no offense to the needy kids, but i'm more needy and it's MY money!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT