Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Don't think quick fix
It's "a lot to ask" to get proposals before voters.
By JENNIFER LIBERTO
Published June 11, 2007
TALLAHASSEE - The Legislature kicks off its two-week special session on property taxes Tuesday, but the road to relief promises to be long and difficult. Lawmakers are almost certain to pass a rollback on the tax rates of local governments, which would provide some immediate savings, an average 6 to 7 percent, for anyone who pays property taxes. But Tallahassee veterans say don't be surprised if lawmakers cannot muster the votes to approve the "super" homestead exemption that has been touted as the concept everyone likes. To put the proposal before voters on the Jan. 29 ballot with the presidential primary, three-quarters of the Legislature needs to be on board, a tall order given that Republican leadership released no details behind the plan until late Friday evening. Voters need to weigh in because the homestead exemption is in the state Constitution. Democrats, while cautiously optimistic that Friday's proposal could work, complained all along that they were excluded from top-level negotiations. They are worried that the proposal cuts too much into the ability of school districts to collect taxes. Republicans are promising that schools will not lose money in the deal, and Democrats say that will be critical. Republicans will need some Democratic votes to get the three-fourths majority vote. "I cut my teeth in the (Bob) Graham administration, " said longtime South Florida lobbyist Ron Book, whose clients include cities. "If I learned nothing else, it's that you don't call and then have a special session unless you have a basic consensus agreement and you know where the votes are. "They don't have a consensus and they don't have the votes." That doesn't mean it can't all come together. After all, House Speaker Marco Rubio and Senate President Ken Pruitt have said for weeks that they agree on the basics; they just lacked a consensus on the details, in other words the amount of the rollback and the homestead exemption. Now, those details have been released, just in time for the session to begin. Veteran lobbyist Richard Gentry points out that almost every year the two chambers are billions of dollars apart on the state budget, and it nearly always seems to work out. Still, most predict lawmakers will have a rougher go of it than they did during the special session on insurance that was held in January. By the time lawmakers convened that session, they already had spent a full week dissecting particular bills. In addition, Republicans worked alongside Democrats throughout the insurance session, giving the minority party a voice that kept them from criticizing the final deal. By comparison, lawmakers will go into the property tax special session with only a handful of lawmakers - those directly involved in negotiations - fully versed in the complicated formula behind property tax cuts being proposed. "Given that traditional special session model, of you having a solution before going to the Legislature, the chances for success are 50-50 at best, " said Barney Bishop, chief executive of the business group Associated Industries of Florida, which hopes to see at least a rollback approved. The business community, usually a champion of tax cuts, is home to most of the skeptics of reaching a deal on the super homestead concept. Businesses have been among the worst hit by escalating property taxes, shouldering a rising share of the tax burden because of the breaks homeowners already enjoy. In fact, if lawmakers lower tax bills too much for homeowners, business owners could end up penalized further as local governments look for new ways, like fees, to recover lost money, a concern of AIF and the Florida Chamber of Commerce. Under the proposals released Friday evening, the bulk of the tax breaks go to homesteaded homeowners, which could rankle the already frustrated business community. Voters would decide whether to replace the existing homestead exemption and their annual Save Our Home cap with the new homestead exemption which would give a 75 percent break on the first $200, 000 of value. Homesteaded properties worth more would get an additional 15 percent off the next $300, 000 in value. So a home valued at $300, 000 would only be taxed on $130, 000. Those who saved more under the old system could stick with the old system. "You're asking, with less than five days to go, for 30 senators and 90 House members to vote on some kind of tiered plan that we don't know anything about, " said Adam Babington, the Florida Chamber of Commerce's property tax director. "It's a lot to ask." Even Rubio expects a struggle to get 90 votes in his own chamber to put a new homestead exemption on the ballot in January. The high vote count is necessary to amend the state Constitution, which also must be approved by voters. "I'm optimistic, but I think there will be resistance, " he said. "You can expect a full-court press and onslaught from those who never wanted property tax reform to happen. I think there are a lot of different ways to try to stop this from happening." He also predicts political consequences for those who stand in the way. "We're going to have a vote on property tax in Florida. It's either going to be on Jan. 29, and everyone cooperates, or it's going to be in November 2008 if they do not, " Rubio said. "Those who stand in the way of the largest tax cut in Florida's history happening sooner rather than later, I believe, will pay a heavy political price."
[Last modified June 10, 2007, 23:46:21]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Dale
|
06/12/07 03:14 PM
|
|
Politicans should quit trying to fool the public by cuting homesteaded propeerty tax and increase tax on rental and business property. Roll back spending to 2005 levels and cap future spending to 3% or growth factor.
|
|
by Dale
|
06/12/07 03:06 PM
|
|
The answer is simple. Eliminate the save our home cap. Roll local budgets back to 2005 levels. Cap local spending increases to 3% or percent of growth. Locals should cut most departments by 25% to eliminate non productive workers.
|
|
by Lyn
|
06/12/07 11:54 AM
|
|
More then likely we will get the shaft just like we did when they were going to reform the Homeowners Insurance issues. Mine went up not down. All they care about is telling us what we want to hear to get them elected to office.
|
|
by Bill
|
06/11/07 04:27 PM
|
|
The present one system is unfair. They propose two systems and you pick the one you like the most. Chaos.
Still no mention of how renters would would be helped. We need more details and examples of how the new system would work.
|
|
by Ray
|
06/11/07 03:24 PM
|
|
WOW 6 percent, WHAT SAVINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
by Bob
|
06/11/07 02:48 PM
|
|
Amen to Rubio's final comment! Property owners need immediate relief from high taxes and the home insurance scammers. For more recent home buyers it's a HUGE nut to crack and fear tactics like the less services threat are bull & we all know it!
|
|
by Richard
|
06/11/07 01:35 PM
|
|
Why is taxes not equal for all...I live here six months in my winter residence and do not homestead...unless this legislation doesn't provide major tax relief to me and many others....no more retirees will move here to spend there money
|
|
by Porter
|
06/11/07 12:44 PM
|
|
I agree completely with the final statement of this article. Any politician worth his/her salt would see that property tax reform is a must. Those that stand in the way should be shuffled from the deck on the next election. Let's all stand up!!
|
|
by jack
|
06/11/07 12:24 PM
|
|
Special session, what a joke. Just do the job you were elected to do. Quit the crying and do the job you swore to do. Lower taxes and insurance rates. This is what the taxpayers want. Do your job or get out! It's what we want, plain and simple.
|
|
by JT
|
06/11/07 11:22 AM
|
|
Rubio has it wrong. It is he who will pay for backing off of his Sales Tax Plan. Current plan is not going to be a solution. NEED DETAILS ON SOH GRANDFATHERING. Public doesn't trust GOVT. Better to do nothing than let them loophole folks out of SOH..
|
|
by James
|
06/11/07 11:22 AM
|
|
The Save Our Homes law was meant to protect Grandma when she can't afford the taxes on a property rising in value. How long will it be before we hear the stories of Grandma's taxes going up by 5-10% a year as her property escalates?
|
|
by Daniel
|
06/11/07 11:13 AM
|
|
I hope a better job is done tackling property tax woes than there was for homeowners insurance rates and availability, what a joke!
|
|
by kevin
|
06/11/07 11:01 AM
|
|
http://www.city-data.com/city/Atlanta-Georgia.html - just click and then access other cities
Avg house/Avg tax bill
Atlanta 218K/2538
Baltimore 200K/2160
Charlotte 160K/1765
San Jose, CA 625K/3951
Las Vegas 285K/1682
Clearwater, FL 220K/3600
|
|
by David
|
06/11/07 10:20 AM
|
|
It is not the Homestead property owners that need a break, it is the fst time owners, 2nd home owners, investors and commercial property owners that need releaf. If they don't get it, Florida will be in a serious slump for years.
David Yost
|
|
by Leah
|
06/11/07 08:50 AM
|
|
We hope the decision will be made as soon as possible. Florida needs a large tax cut so we can afford housing in our state. The increase in government money from the housing boom in 2004 & 2005 needs to be returned to the money available in 2003.
|
|
by Tony
|
06/11/07 08:50 AM
|
|
Why does the Legislature continue to give the biggest tax decreases to those who already get the most in tax breaks and to those who pay the least?
|
|
by Scott
|
06/11/07 08:24 AM
|
|
The rollback must return the $$ collected to the levels banked by local and state govt in 2002/03. We had plenty of services then, and if they were barred from collecting one penny more, we would have plenty of services now. Get it done or find a job
|
|
by Larry
|
06/11/07 07:59 AM
|
|
The tax cut debate is still mostly off-focus. The real debate should be over what services we want our state and local governments to provide. Tax cut proponents mostly hide behind empty rhetoric. They need to identify the cuts in services.
|
|
by JACQUE
|
06/11/07 07:19 AM
|
|
Get rid of property taxes. Raise sales taxes. Florida's biggest industry is tourism. Free money. Start a state income. Save our homes = stuck in our homes. Let us choose where we want to live. USE ELECTION TIME TO SHOW YOUR VOICE. THEY WORK FOR US.
|
|
by Gab
|
06/11/07 05:46 AM
|
|
...much difference in Clwtr when compared to before the real estate boom. Downtown is a joke. One more thing: Force cities to cut projects BEFORE necessities, such as boat slips BEFORE police. Or make it go to a publicized vote to chose cuts.
|
|
by Gab
|
06/11/07 05:40 AM
|
|
2)Prohibit tax increases beyond inflation
3)No SOH, allowing for grandfathering
4)Make cities show where ALL the money goes. Make them lay it out in kindergarten terms
I don't mind paying for amenities, but w/the tax increases, I haven't seen...
|
|
by Gab
|
06/11/07 05:35 AM
|
|
As a new homeowner paying who will pay over 2000 more in taxes than the previous owners who owned less than 10 years, here is what I want to see:
1)Cap local gvmt spending w/o punishing schools
|
|
by John
|
06/11/07 02:40 AM
|
|
We are ready to vote out everyone that stands in the way of substantial property tax relief. You can count on that. No matter what, let's get the statutory vote passed first.
|
|