News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Anatomy of a Senate failure
By DAVID S. BRODER Washington Post Writers Group
Published June 14, 2007
WASHINGTON - It is hard to say who looked worse in the Senate's impasse on immigration legislation - Democrats or Republicans - but the responsibility for reviving that measure clearly rests most heavily on the shoulders of Majority Leader Harry Reid.
It was Reid who decided last Thursday to pull the bill off the floor, after a small number of recalcitrant Republicans, led by Jim DeMint of South Carolina, blocked his efforts to clear away the remaining Republican amendments and move toward a final vote.
Reid abandoned the effort to pass the legislation, despite pleas from its leading Democratic sponsor, Sen. Ted Kennedy, to give it more time - and despite an offer from Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to pare down overnight the list of remaining Republican amendments to a manageable size.
Reid had decided that a week of debate before the Memorial Day recess and another four or five days last week was all the time the Senate could afford for what is arguably the single most important domestic issue on the agenda.
All this, from a Senate which had spent most of the past five months battling futilely with President Bush over a timetable for American withdrawal from Iraq - and which then closed down for three days over last weekend and used Monday for a debate on a purely symbolic vote of no-confidence in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Readers of this column know I am no fan of Senator Reid. When I wrote recently about his shortcomings as majority leader, the Washington Post received a protest letter signed by the other 50 senators in the Democratic Caucus, attesting to their devotion to their leader.
I may be risking another mass reprimand by what I am about to write, but here is what I know:
There's no doubt that DeMint, Jeff Sessions of Alabama and a few other Republicans were out to stop the immigration bill - and were conducting a filibuster by amendment. But McConnell, who supports the legislation and was eager to deliver a legislative victory to Bush, said repeatedly that the Republicans would vote to end debate after they had a chance to offer as many amendments as they did last year - when they controlled the Senate and passed a similar immigration measure.
By McConnell's count, they were nine short of that number when Reid tried to cut off debate Thursday night. Democrats have a different tally. Reid had been trying all day to cut a deal with the Republicans to dispose of a few more amendments, but was continually stymied by DeMint and Sessions. Reid said he would brook no more delay. But with McConnell withholding his help, only seven of the 49 Republicans voted for cloture - and it failed, prompting Reid to remove the immigration bill from the Senate floor.
In his pique, Reid was quick to label the rejected legislation as "the president's bill, " even though the White House had had less to do with writing it than a bipartisan group of senators, mainly members of the Judiciary Committee. Reid also put the onus on Bush to deliver more Republican votes to end debate, making that a condition for possibly reviving the measure - after the Senate finishes work on an energy bill some time next week.
His aides and associates insist that Reid really wants an immigration bill. But he went out of his way to rewrite that bill to meet the demands of organized labor by allowing a second vote on an amendment by Byron Dorgan of North Dakota to "sunset" after five years the guest-worker program that unions see as a competitive source of low-wage workers.
The Dorgan amendment lost by one vote the first time, but passed by a single vote the next time - as four conservative Republicans supported it in hopes it would become a "poison pill" that killed the fragile bipartisan consensus behind the bill. Reid himself supported the "killer" amendment.
Reid may think that Bush will suffer if immigration reform is killed. But the public is likely to put the blame where it principally belongs - on the leader of the party that runs the Senate.
David Broder's e-mail address is davidbroder@ washpost.com.
[Last modified June 13, 2007, 22:12:18]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by DM
|
06/14/07 10:12 PM
|
|
Good thing cost of goods and services without illegals working was brought up. Study by industry assoc. shows the average head of lettuce would cost 10cents more. Now how much less will your taxes be to subsidize cheap labor? Health care,schools,jail
|
|
by JT
|
06/14/07 04:29 PM
|
|
No amnesty.Secure the Border. Attrition through enforcement.Mexican people need to go home and fight corruption to make their country better.If Congress passes amnesty plan ask them how much of YOUR SS/Medicare will be given to the new Amexicans...
|
|
by Dave
|
06/14/07 12:55 PM
|
|
Without a guest worker program we will be paying 8 times as much for produce if we can find people to harvest. I am so tired of the simpletons who think only in terms of piecemeal legislation. We need the cheep labor to build their fence
|
|
by Tammy
|
06/14/07 12:39 PM
|
|
No amnesty = no hope when pictures of 12 million people being rounded up and put in boxcars to be shipped out of the country the rest of the world will know how Unamerican and selfish folks like Chuck and Trent are.
|
|
by MIM
|
06/14/07 11:51 AM
|
|
No Amnesty! Control the border, deal with those illegals now in country,enforce existing law of the land, punish employers of illegals,insist on English only on all govt documents/applications. Spend the money on the wall. It's not that complicated!
|
|
by Chuck
|
06/14/07 11:09 AM
|
|
Secure the Borders!!! Once the borders are secure, then we can talk about what to do with the law breakers living here now.
|
|
by Trent
|
06/14/07 10:11 AM
|
|
Why don't writers like this and Congress understand that the majority of Americans don't want this bill. We want secure borders and our current laws enforced. NO AMNESTY! How arrogant to act like they don't hear us!
|