Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Schools
District could shuffle pupils
A plan to assign kids to schools close to home would involve some upheaval.
By THOMAS C. TOBIN
Published June 14, 2007
Pinellas school officials have devised a way to scrap the choice plan and assign kids to schools close to their homes. But it comes with some pain. Implementing it quickly would force the district to uproot thousands of kids from their old "choice" schools and reassign them to their new neighborhood schools, starting in August 2008. Moving more gradually would allow students to finish out at their "choice" schools, but they would occupy seats that otherwise would go to neighborhood students. The transition to a neighborhood school system would take years to play out. The proposal by superintendent Clayton Wilcox aims to give parents what they have demanded for years - a system where every family gets a chance at a school close to home. Now it's up to the School Board to decide how to get there, be it fast or slow. The board meets next Thursday to hear Wilcox's proposal, which bears little resemblance to the 4-year-old choice system. Scores of details have yet to be sorted out before the plan is approved this fall, but many details have emerged in meetings this month between Wilcox and his top staff. Among them: -The district would be divided into eight "community sensitive" attendance areas for elementary schools, four areas for middle schools and two for high schools. -Within each attendance area, every school would be surrounded by a zone. -Students would be assigned to the school in the zone where they live. If the zone school is filled, they would be assigned to the next closest school. If a family didn't want their assigned school, they could ask to go to another school in their attendance area, providing there was space there. -Each attendance area would have a "rich variety" of regular schools and two or three special offerings, such as a fundamental school, magnet school or charter school. In addition, families could apply for a seat in a countywide magnet program. -Each elementary area would have at least one fundamental school, nearly doubling the number of elementary fundamentals. -Bringing students closer to home would make for shorter and fewer bus routes, saving time and money. School start times would be made more palatable. Money saved would go to special programs. -Each student's path through the school system would be predictable, with the progression from elementary to high school based on a family's address. -The district would scrap the current application process, with its numerous rules and multiple deadlines. If a family wanted a school other than the one assigned, making the change could be as simple as showing up at another school to ask if there's room. -The district would close a handful of schools to reduce overhead as Pinellas enrollment declines. Jennifer Crockett, a St. Petersburg mother of three who last year ran an unsuccessful campaign for School Board, said she liked the idea of the eight elementary attendance zones. They're smaller than the ones used under the choice plan. "But I'm unsure of the idea of saying, 'This is your school.' " Pinellas families may have gotten used to choosing schools, Crockett said. In fact, so many families have chosen or been assigned to schools far from home that district officials are finding it difficult to unwind the choice plan. Wilcox and his staff discovered the problem earlier this month as they started to research what a system of neighborhood schools would look like in Pinellas. They divided the county into eight attendance areas with a zone around each of the district's 82 elementary schools. Then they proposed that all elementary students would be assigned to the school in the zone where they live - usually the school closest to their home, but sometimes a school just "close" to home. District officials found that, based on the 2006-07 school year, a whopping 68 percent of elementary students would be in a school outside their new zone. Wilcox was incredulous. "There's no way, " he marveled during a meeting last week. "I just can't believe that choice could have moved kids that far." The choice plan was designed as a transition away from three decades of busing for desegregation. It encouraged families to try schools outside their neighborhoods as a way to voluntarily integrate classrooms. While choice fell short of its integration goals, it did get families to venture out. One example is McMullen-Booth Elementary in eastern Clearwater, which draws students from the far western part of the city, Dunedin, Safety Harbor, Oldsmar, East Lake and as far south as the Highpoint area. Less than 30 percent of McMullen-Booth's students from 2006-07 were in its new zone. "It worked perfectly, " Wilcox said of the choice plan, which effectively ended in May. Still, Wilcox said, the numbers seem at odds with what parents have said in surveys, polls and public hearings - that they want to be guaranteed a school close to home. If that is so, why have so many people chosen schools so far away? he asked. "Is closest to home really what people want when they say closest to home?" While some families ended up in schools they didn't want, about 80 percent of those who applied got their first choice. Deputy superintendent Julie Janssen worried about requiring families to immediately move from their choice school to their new zone school. "You're going to have so much movement that nobody's going to be happy, " she said. Wilcox and his staff have tried to come up with ways to lessen the pain of a quick transition. One idea is to let older kids - such as fourth- and fifth-graders or high school upperclassmen - finish out at their choice schools. The zones around each school are preliminary, their boundaries based on enrollment for the 2006-07 academic year. They were drawn with an eye toward each school's capacity, keeping neighborhood kids together and not forcing them to cross busy roads to get to school. Details and refinements will emerge in School Board meetings and public hearings this summer and fall. A final vote is tentatively scheduled for the board's Nov. 13 meeting. Thomas C. Tobin can be reached at tobin@sptimes.com or 727 893-8923.
[Last modified June 14, 2007, 07:15:01]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Kelly
|
06/29/07 08:45 PM
|
|
If the parents choose, the school board needs to allow students already enrolled in a school (and siblings) to "graduate" that school and it becomes the parents responsiblity to get their children to school. After that, they go to their zone school.
|
|
by Unbelievable
|
06/28/07 12:04 PM
|
|
My kids go to Fund. school in the new proposed zone 8. We live in the new Zone 1. There are no fund., charter, or magnet schools in the "new zone" 1. I'll move to a different state before I allow my kids to be uprooted from a school we love.
|
|
by concerned
|
06/15/07 04:44 PM
|
|
Middle school children are vulnerable emotionally-uprooting them from their friends and support system could have disastrous effects-they are only there 3 yrs. anyway - GRANDFATHER THEM as well as 4th,5th grade and high school from 10th up at least!!
|
|
by Natalie
|
06/14/07 09:39 PM
|
|
Im a student at St. Pete High and Im deffinently NOT MOVING HIGHSCHOOLS! this is the dumbest decision!!!! they should let the students choose since we are the ones that are going to the schools.
|
|
by Kristin
|
06/14/07 09:13 PM
|
|
I completely agree with centralized schools. I don't agree in changing kids schools once the family has committed to one. Let ALL kids be grandfathered in and have the parents get them there - just like we have to do now at all the Fundamentals.
|
|
by Eugene
|
06/14/07 08:49 PM
|
|
School Choice should have led the to "bankrupt" of inferior schools as parents non-chose them. Instead those schools were assigned customers and kept open as-is. The net effect was a game of musical chairs with less money for actual Education. END IT
|
|
by Melissa
|
06/14/07 05:53 PM
|
|
There is no way that I will allow my children to go to several of the schools that are listed in my area. I will end up paying for private school if I have too. Just let the children allready in school stay at that school if they choose too.
|
|
by Potential
|
06/14/07 03:44 PM
|
|
One of the positives of neigborhood schools is the potential for increased PTA numbers, teacher home visits, community pride, school volunteers, home/school/community collaboration, etc. The great thing is we can get rid of excuses if we ALL do it!
|
|
by fed up
|
06/14/07 02:37 PM
|
|
Gee.......you think that spelling and punctuation (perhaps even grammar) should be taught in schools? Amazing. Let's just get back to basics. Abandon zero tolerance and the FCAT scores. Exceed expectations. Teach the basics.
|
|
by Mitch
|
06/14/07 02:12 PM
|
|
Look no farther than the posts below as evidence of a substandard educational system - "there" rather than "their", "your" instead of "you're". End the bickering about where education is received and begin focusing on quality and accountability.
|
|
by Patrick Henry
|
06/14/07 01:15 PM
|
|
Bring back Bob Lassiter..........
|
|
by Gladys
|
06/14/07 01:13 PM
|
|
I use to live in pinellas county, dislike the choice plan, since moving to pasco county, my kids go to there near by school. I love it, that is how it should be for all schools. they need to take lessons from pasco county.
|
|
by Farrah
|
06/14/07 11:37 AM
|
|
How stupid are parents here this is a great oppertunity for low income families to get the education that they all have said thier children werent getting at the neighborhood school face it this works if you listen and follow the rules!!!!
|
|
by Gab
|
06/14/07 11:35 AM
|
|
Wow, sounds like how it was when I attended school in PC 20 years ago. MUCH BETTER! Save on gas, now focus on making ALL schools better and equal. Of course, state laws will have to change for that to happen.
|
|
by Barbara
|
06/14/07 10:40 AM
|
|
If people want their kids to continue in their current school, let them do so, but they must be responsible for getting them there. Put the $$ where they're needed: in educating the students!
|
|
by Michael
|
06/14/07 10:25 AM
|
|
School assignment based on neighborhoods? What futuristic thinking! You mean that now you can consider the schools in the area when you buy a home? What geniuses we have overseeing our school system! What's next? Raises for teachers with the saved $?
|
|
by Erika
|
06/14/07 10:10 AM
|
|
If you let the 4th & 5th graders stay, what about their 2nd grade sibling? And to enforce them to move in to the plan according, take away transportation!! That will really help the struggling families!(who will need gas money, too!)
|
|
by Erika
|
06/14/07 10:05 AM
|
|
Families did not "choose" to send their children to schools that were far from home. Choice "assigned" them to the school. I do not personally like the Choice Plan,but I am worried about implementing this as soon as this fall,it should be phased in.
|
|
by Monique
|
06/14/07 10:02 AM
|
|
You can't just take a child out of a school with no warning! We used choice to get the best possible school for our children. You can't just take that away now! It's not my problem there are flaws with program. GRANDFATHER those who want to stay!
|
|
by Nikki
|
06/14/07 10:00 AM
|
|
They gave us the choice program, they can't just yank kids out of their schools now! I have a 3rd and 1st grader attending a school out of our area. I DRIVE them every day. They need to be able to stay put and finish out their time at their school
|
|
by K
|
06/14/07 09:27 AM
|
|
My child better not be moved with this new plan as it was hard enough to get him registered and assigned a school because of errors made by the school district in registration process. They can't seem to do the job we pay them for!
|
|
by Kay
|
06/14/07 09:18 AM
|
|
With a child starting school in the next few years, I'm very glad to read this. It should free up much $$$. It's a free education and the only choice should be to accept it or not (& go private).
|
|
by TH
|
06/14/07 09:15 AM
|
|
YEA! Bring back the neighborhood school program. This will be great for the neighborhoods as well as those who are relocating into the market in the middle of a school year. Get it done soon!!!
|
|
by john
|
06/14/07 09:11 AM
|
|
I've seen the map layout and I think it's no better than before choice. I send my 2 jids to Palm Harbor because the schools in my area suck. Once again, we have elected people making a changes to a system without asking the voters what they think.
|
|
by James
|
06/14/07 09:08 AM
|
|
Now it is going to be important to maintain eqality in all the schools. Schools in one zone should not be inferior to schools in another zone. That was the whole point to integration - schools on one side of town had superior goods/services.
|
|
by DEE
|
06/14/07 09:00 AM
|
|
I think they should let kids in high school finish if they want at the high school they started in they have already started there and should be able to finish there it wouldnt be fair.they have all there frinds and teachers let them stay
|
|
by Pete
|
06/14/07 08:59 AM
|
|
I went to school blocks from my house and within walking distance for jr high and high school. When your young walking to school is great and you get to hang with your friends Having to go to school miles from home is crazy
|
|
by Jane
|
06/14/07 08:47 AM
|
|
What about magnets?
|
|
by Janet
|
06/14/07 08:40 AM
|
|
A child attending school in their own area is very important.I know from experience as a child who had to leave my freinds & attend a totally different grade school. I was devastated.Also, I walked over 2 miles a day to school.
|
|
by Laurie
|
06/14/07 08:36 AM
|
|
Pinellas Co School Board needs an overhaul. I received 3 letters in 1 day assigning my child to 3 different schools. 1st day of school I have no idea where he'll be going. Right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing! What gives Mr. Wilcox?!
|
|
by Dave
|
06/14/07 08:35 AM
|
|
Glad to see Wilcox got a chance to see how the choice plan has made it no choice plan. Now go back and take a look at the original data of the choice forms and I will bet many of those students did not get their first choice.
|
|
by Michelle
|
06/14/07 07:38 AM
|
|
As much as it may pain some parents to have to move their child I think it is for the best to not procrastinate. Get the job done. I do agree that 4th and 5th graders, along with 11th and 12th graders should be able to stay put. The rest will adjust
|
|
by Bob
|
06/14/07 07:19 AM
|
|
Arterial busing would be better. All schools would be a bus drop off - pick up area. Students would be responsible to get to their nearest school (elementary, middle or high) and would catch the bus to their school from there.
|
|
by Waz
|
06/14/07 07:11 AM
|
|
Please bring back a sense of community to our school system. I bet parent business and local goverment involvement will increase once the new school zones are implemented. Plus you might see some of the missing students return to the system.
|
|
by j w
|
06/14/07 07:01 AM
|
|
Dr. Wilcox and School Board, please expedite your decision, November is too late. The community needs as much time as possible to adjust to a new system. Make all schools good schools so that all students are educated and safe.
|
|