News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Columns
A tax cut for real, but then a shaky idea
By HOWARD TROXLER
Published June 17, 2007
Did the Legislature really do much in its special session last week about property taxes in our state?
Sure. Absolutely.
After years of growth, local governments in Florida will have to cut total tax collections next year. The gear is put into reverse for a year.
And from now on, each county and city will have a cap on tax growth -- taxes can't go up faster than personal income grows in Florida.
This is a major change in the way that the people of Florida are taxed and governed. It affects property owners of every kind.
What it will NOT do is roll back all the tax increases of recent years. This cut is moderate, not deep. The most any local government has to cut its taxes is 9 percent.
According to the Legislature, that's an average savings next year of $174 for owners of a homestead exemption, $199 for other homeowners, and $942 for commercial or industrial property.
But if you are unlucky enough to get another big hike in your property's value, it wipes out part of that tax cut for you. That's one thing critics don't like about this deal.
Another thing: Local commissions and councils can "override" their cap on tax increases. Depending on the amount, that would take a two-thirds vote, a unanimous vote, or even an election. But it's possible. Override fights might become an annual ritual.
- - -
The second half of what the Legislature did last week is more debatable. Now we will vote in January on whether to give Florida homes a second, even bigger tax break.
If the idea passes and becomes part of our Constitution, each homeowner will get the chance to trade his or her existing $25, 000 homestead exemption for a bigger one.
It isn't simple. There is some math and some risk involved in that choice. We'll be hearing a lot about it.
But the big picture here is that the Legislature came up with a bigger break for the Floridians who already have the best tax deal - homeowners protected by the existing Save Our Homes cap.
And yet even this idea wouldn't totally fix the problems of Save Our Homes. First-time home buyers and people buying a different house would still get a whopping new tax appraisal.
What good is a flashy new homestead exemption, if the total value of your house gets jacked up so high that you pay more taxes anyway?
Last, the "moderate" tax break we're getting this fall would be more than doubled over the next five years if voters pass the bigger homestead tax break in January.
Then we'd have bigger tax cuts, even to schools, with homeowners getting all the break and everybody else holding the bag.
We're in for a titanic fight with a lot of players. Schools, teachers, police, firefighters, public employees will warn about such cuts. Homeowners and the home industry might favor it, but other business groups will hate it. So, did the Legislature really do much last week? You bet it did. As to whether it was all good ...
- - -
There's lots of stuff about the session on TroxBlog, along with other opinions, readers' comments and weekly live chats about current events.
Click on the "Blogs" link on www.tampabay.com. You also can type in the address blogs.tampabay.com/troxler.
[Last modified June 16, 2007, 23:39:48]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by John
|
06/19/07 09:28 PM
|
|
...or local gov't could get a huge roll-back that would make this tax cut proposal look like chicken feed. They have the votes to do it statutorily too without taking it to a state-wide vote.
Local govt, be careful what you wish for!!
|
|
by John
|
06/19/07 09:26 PM
|
|
Joshu, i kind of hope this does not pass in Jan., then the Republican controlled legislature can pass a real roll-back via statutory. Maybe to 2001 levels. If local government is smart, they will get behind this tax cut plan or they could get ...
|
|
by Walter
|
06/19/07 12:54 AM
|
|
I wish the property tax would be lowered long enough for me to sell my house . I can't afford to wait 5 years .
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
06/18/07 10:24 PM
|
|
Cutting local government is a major plank in the GOP party line because it robs us of our most direct form of representation against exploitation by developers and corporations who created this tax mess. Vote "NO" to GOP corporate pandering.
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
06/18/07 10:18 PM
|
|
Vote "No" on any tax bill sponsored by the GOP - they only favor the interests of weathy developers and polluters - so you can bet its not the best deal for most Floridians.
|
|
by roger daleiden
|
06/18/07 03:59 PM
|
|
9% wont stop me fromleaving the state its peanuts on my $3200.00 taxbill it just another way to award the beauacrats for the money they stole in the past and gave each other big salaries and even unwarranted bonuses goodbye fl
|
|
by roger daleiden
|
06/18/07 03:59 PM
|
|
9% wont stop me fromleaving the state its peanuts on my $3200.00 taxbill it just another way to award the beauacrats for the money they stole in the past and gave each other big salaries and even unwarranted bonuses goodbye fl
|
|
by John
|
06/18/07 03:13 PM
|
|
Jim SOH has already defeated several constitutional challenges and won. Also, if you're a homeowner you too are protected by SOH, if you're a snowbird well, no residency? No voice.
|
|
by Patta
|
06/18/07 09:22 AM
|
|
Sounds like second home owners will not get any relief. Once the snowbirds feel the ineqity and leave the state, do you really think tourism alone will carry FL? The tax fix needs to be fair for all.
|
|
by Kim
|
06/17/07 08:14 PM
|
|
I am keeping my SOH.Look at your taxes on the electic& phone bill, and you are paying more than 1/3 for your water that Tampa.St.Pete has more money coming in and just spends it. Stormwater brings the city 0ver 1.5 million of free money to spend.
|
|
by John
|
06/17/07 04:26 PM
|
|
If this bill does not pass, the legislators needs to do an immediate deep roll-back of taxes to 2001 levels. They can do this via statutory thus not needing vote at polls.
|
|
by Dave
|
06/17/07 04:12 PM
|
|
I am still trying to find out what kind of tax break is going to be given to owners of second homes,it seems the state government have forgotten about second home owners.There is nothing being printed or mentioned about these homes?
|
|
by Gab
|
06/17/07 11:54 AM
|
|
I want this cap on spending further explained. I would save an very large amount by going to the new exemption, but I have zero faith in my are to not raise taxes. Cap them, but if THEY can override that cap, what's the point? It shoud be by vote.
|
|
by Walt
|
06/17/07 11:16 AM
|
|
This is the biggest bunch of -- . What's wrong with limiting the Counties assesment to the CPI?
|
|
by Dan
|
06/17/07 10:31 AM
|
|
Sounds like more double talk to me. Kind of like the where's the fence advertisement going around. In this case it's where is the tax cut?
|
|
by Eugene
|
06/17/07 10:18 AM
|
|
Another FARCE...more discrepancy between homesteaders & non-homesteaders.
|
|
by Jim
|
06/17/07 09:32 AM
|
|
It's time for the non homesteaded property owners to file a suit in Federal Court to find the save our homes cap unconstitutional and reverse the tax inequities that it caused. I wonder how all the cap people will feel when they get that tax bill.
|
|
by Jerry
|
06/17/07 09:32 AM
|
|
Sounds like the common person gets screwed again.
|
|
by Moustache Peet
|
06/17/07 06:52 AM
|
|
If it gives everyone a break on soaring taxes thats a good thing. I am keeping my SOH because I don't trust the politicians to find another way to tax me up the ying yang if I give it up. If the bill don't pass then what?
|