Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Debate turns on 1 word: amnesty

Supporters hope a ''touchback'' plan will ease concerns of foes of immigration bill.

By ANITA KUMAR
Published June 21, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - Conservative politicians, talk show hosts and bloggers have not been shy about denouncing a Senate immigration overhaul that they say rewards illegal immigrants with legal residency and citizenship.

As Congress resumes its debate this week, some senators may have found a way to appease those critics who simply describe the bill as "amnesty."

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, wants to force all illegal immigrants - not just those seeking permanent residence - to return to their home country before being allowed to return to the United States legally.

The so-called touchback provision, requiring illegal immigrants to return home, would make the path to citizenship slower, more difficult and therefore more fair, supporters of the amendment say.

Immigrant advocates warn that some immigrants will not risk a return home without a guarantee they can come back. Those who oppose citizenship for illegal immigrants say the change is largely meaningless, describing it as "amnesty with a road trip."

"I believe having the return provision ... is the right thing to do, " Hutchison said. "For some, it's not enough. For others, it's too much."

The amendment is one of about two dozen that the Senate will consider on the landmark immigration bill that congressional leaders hope to pass before the Fourth of July recess. It could give the bill the boost it needs to pass, or be significant enough to jeopardize the fragile compromise that has been carefully crafted during the last several months.

"I'm worried that in an effort to get the Republican support they need, they are pulling it so far to the right that they may lose Democrat support, " said Angela Kelley of the National Immigration Forum, which supports the bill. "It is looking uglier and uglier because of the nature of the amendments being floated."

President Bush has continued to make immigration one of his top domestic goals, but the complicated issue continues to divide lawmakers from both parties and both chambers.

The 627-page Senate bill would allow a path to citizenship for the nation's 12-million illegal immigrants, expand the guest worker program and increase security on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Two weeks ago, the Senate abandoned the bill after it lacked the support to move forward. Opponents had offered more than 300 amendments to extend the debate and argued that they should have been given more time.

Key negotiators including Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., helped resurrect the bill, partly by agreeing to consider about two dozen amendments.

The amendments, written equally by Republicans and Democrats, would increase the number of visas allowed for high-tech workers, give family ties more weight in the point system used to determine which immigrants get legal residence and criminalize those who overstay their visas, among other things.

The list does not include a fix to a controversial change made two weeks ago that would end the guest worker program in five years.

Opponents of the bill call the slew of amendments a sham because they could easily and quietly be removed from the bill by Senate and House negotiators later in the process.

"These amendments don't matter, " said Rosemary Jenks, director of government relations for Numbers USA, who opposes the bill. "They are basically for show."

Senate leaders and negotiators are closely guarding the list of amendments, which are still in flux. But Hutchison said she has been promised hers would be considered.

As the bill is written, illegal immigrants would be granted new Z visas, allowing them to remain in the United States. Those who want to be permanent residents or citizens would be required to temporarily go back to their home country after eight years, pay fines and learn English.

Hutchison's proposal would require the trip to the home country to occur earlier, in the first few years, and would pertain to all those who receive Z visas, including temporary residents.

"I think it helps. It deals with the impression that we are just fining people and then allowing them to be on a path to citizenship, " Sen. Jon Cornyn, R-Texas.

Immigrant advocates do not support the change, but some say they are willing to support it to get the bill passed.

"The most important thing is that we pass something, " said Tamar Jacoby of the conservative Manhattan Institute, who favors comprehensive immigration reform that includes citizenship.

A bill introduced in the House earlier this year would require illegal immigrants to leave the United States, though they would not necessarily have to go back to their home country. Some House Republicans are working on their own compromise that includes what is called the "touchback" provision.

"We've got a long way to go, " said Sen. Trent Lott, Senate Republican whip. "It's a delicate dance."

Times researcher Angie Drobnic Holan contributed to this report. Anita Kumar can be reached at akumar@sptimes.com or 202-463-0576.

Fast Facts:

What's next

The Senate expects to resume debate on immigration reform this week with a preliminary vote expected Friday. About two dozen amendments will be considered before a final vote is taken. If the Senate passes a bill, the House plans to consider its proposal in July. Negotiators from the two chambers would then try to hash out a compromise later.

The Senate immigration bill

The bill includes a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants after eight years if they meet certain criteria and return to their home country. It would expand the guest worker program, create a stronger verification system for employers and increase border security.

Some of the possible amendments

- Give family ties more weight in a proposed point system that will be used to determine who will be allowed legal residence.

- Limit new Z visas to those who have been in country for at least four years and have ties to communities.

- Forbid employers from hiring guest workers after a major layoff.

- Offer federal grants of $500 to immigrants for English classes.

- Ban immigrants from receiving any Social Security earned while illegal.

- Criminalize immigrants who overstay their visas.

- Double the number of green cards issued to parents of U.S. citizens.

- Offer refugee protection to Iraqi religious minorities.

- Authorize 10 new judges in areas with a high number of immigration cases.

[Last modified June 21, 2007, 01:00:45]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Doug 06/21/07 09:17 PM
Who is ever going to read or understand a bill that is over 600 pages. As usual, a bunch of political crap.
by Tom 06/21/07 05:23 PM
It is still amnesty. If I go and commit a felony can I recieve amnesty? Punish the business that hire the illegals and kick the illegals out, children too. Give their jobs to the people on welfare.
by Joanne 06/21/07 05:21 PM
Bill is so cumbersome it will not fly.Congressmen playing with ammendments are stymied. Kill it and start from scratch, without provisions for amnesty of any kind. No such thing as a temporary worker. Once here they stay and reap unearned benefits.
by Max 06/21/07 02:26 PM
Evidently the only way to get represented by the politicians in Washington is to not be an American.
by Tom 06/21/07 02:23 PM
Clinton said he never had sex with Monica. Bush says this isn't an amnesty. I don't believe either of them.
by A J 06/21/07 02:18 PM
NO MEANS NO. If your want the benefits do it legally,learn the language and no one has a problems with you. I was not given anything when I lived in another country and had to learn the language to survive. No means no
by John 06/21/07 01:51 PM
Why would we pay them to learn English? Why are we rewarding those who give birth here to benefit from their offsprings citizenship? Illegal is illegal. Secure the boarder and punish any company who employs illegals.
by Bill Hawkins 06/21/07 01:40 PM
If business, religious, and political organizations want illegal immigrants legalized to advance their own interests then they should pay the social costs which are aroung $100 billion per year.
by Rod 06/21/07 12:28 PM
Some goverment official say that talk radio shows are telling lies??? What "Exactly" "specifically" lies have they told? Also they have a problem with us Americans using the word amnesty. How about these words then, ENFORCE THE LAWS, NO ILLEGALS
by Mim 06/21/07 11:45 AM
Who is capable of monitoring this fiasco? Certainly none of our current agencies. The bill is absurd in so many ways, it should be discarded. Seal the border! Deal with those here now. Conform to our laws or stay out. No more give-away programs.
by Sam 06/21/07 11:03 AM
Better yet, why not give each U.S. citizen $500 to learn Spanish so we can deal with all these ILLEGAL ALIENS!
by JT 06/21/07 11:03 AM
627 pages to do what can be done in 1 line means there is a lot of loopholes and special anti-American interests being served.Secure the border, enforce the law and stop pandering to mexico just to get the cheap labor and cheaper votes.3rd Party time
by Tom 06/21/07 10:42 AM
When running in 2004, Mel Marinez said "I strongly oppose amnesty for illegal aliens; our immigration laws should not reward lawlessness". What a lying bought-and-paid-for traitor to his constituents. I will remember his betrayal in 2010.
by Eileen 06/21/07 10:34 AM
This is crazy. My grandfather came here from Poland, and he had to go through Ellis Island, and have a name change and learn english. I really want to support illegals, NOT! I have my own family to support. Send them to Iraq to work. BAS
by Harry 06/21/07 08:35 AM
Why can't the idiots in D.C. get the fact that we want the border secured first and our current laws enforced. They have a visa backlog now. How can they handle even more? And..why pay people to learn English...require it!
by Scott 06/21/07 08:12 AM
It seems inevitable that some form of this bill will pass. It will be more palatable if there is no access to ANY FREE SERVICES until they become citizens. This is not the land of free stuff paid for by taxpayers. Congress - listen up!!
by Scott 06/21/07 08:10 AM
Offer federal grants of $500 to immigrants for English classes?? Why not give the money to US citizens who own schools and cause them to offer free classes for learning english? It is FREE stuff that brings some of these folks here in the first place
by Deborah 06/21/07 08:07 AM
Americans have no represention. Be frighten our hospitals NOW have Spanish as their first langauge. Dr.'s and nurses that speak English choose to speak Spanish. Which I believe compromises patient care. Voice your concerns and your out of a job!!!!!
by Jane 06/21/07 06:49 AM
What part of NO AMNESTY do they not understand? They say we can't get along without illegal aliens-let's give it a try. I'm willing to pay more for tomatoes in exchange for not providing them free medical care in the ERs & lower crime!
by Russ 06/21/07 06:35 AM
What a total joke this is. The politicians want the hispanic vote & big business wants slave labor wages. What do American citizens get from this? They won't enforce the immigration laws we now have. If you believe them, I have a bridge to sell you.
by Pam 06/21/07 06:19 AM
The word is very easy to say. NO! All the way down the line. Where do you think these gangs are coming from?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT