St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

ISOLATE THE ISLAMISTS

To concentrate the minds of the terrorists running Gaza, cut off gasoline supplies. Then electricity.

By WASHINGTON POST
Published June 22, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - Gaza is now run not by a conventional political party, but by a movement that is revolutionary, Islamist and terrorist. Worse, Hamas is a client of Iran. Gaza now constitutes the farthest reach of the archipelago of Iranian proxies: Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Mahdi Army among others in Iraq, and the Alawite regime of Syria.

This Islamist minireplica of Comintern is at war not just with Israel but with the moderate Arab states, who finally woke up to this threat last summer when they denounced Hezbollah for provoking the Lebanon war with Israel. The fall of Gaza is particularly terrifying to Egypt because Hamas is so closely affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, the chief Islamist threat to the secular-nationalist regime that has ruled Egypt since 1952. Which is why Egypt has just invited Israeli, Jordanian and moderate Palestinian leaders to a summit next week - pointedly excluding and isolating Hamas.

The splitting of Palestine into two entities is nonetheless clarifying. Since Hamas won the parliamentary elections of January 2006, we've had to deal with the fiction of a supposedly unified Palestine ruled by an avowedly "unity" government of Fatah and Hamas. Now the muddle has undergone political hydrolysis, separating out the relatively pure elements: a Hamas-ruled Gaza and Fatah-ruled (for now) West Bank.

The policy implications are obvious. There is nothing to do with the radical Islamist entity that is Gaza but to isolate it. No recognition, no aid (except humanitarian necessities through the United Nations), no diplomatic commerce.

Israel now has the opportunity to establish deterrence against unremitting rocket attacks from Gaza into Israeli villages. Israel failed to do that after it evacuated Gaza in 2005, permitting the development of an unprecedented parasitism by willingly supplying food, water, electricity and gasoline to a territory that was actively waging hostilities against it.

With Hamas now clearly in charge, Israel should declare that it will tolerate no more rocket fire - that the next Qassam will be answered with a cutoff of gasoline shipments. This should bring road traffic in Gaza to a halt within days and make it increasingly difficult to ferry around missiles and launchers.

If that fails to concentrate the mind, the next step should be to cut off electricity.

Regarding the West Bank, policy should be equally clear. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas represents moderation, and should be helped as he tries to demonstrate authority and success in running his part of Palestine.

But let's remember who Abbas is. He appears well intended but he is afflicted with near-disastrous weaknesses. He controls little. His troops in Gaza simply collapsed against the greatly outnumbered forces of Hamas.

But the greater liability is his character. He is weak and indecisive. During the battle for Gaza, he did not order his Fatah forces to return fire against the Hamas insurrection until the fight was essentially over. Remember, too, that after Yasser Arafat's death Abbas ran the Palestinian Authority without a Hamas presence for more than a year. Can you name a single thing he achieved in that time?

Moreover, his Fatah party is ideologically spent and widely discredited. Historian Michael Oren points out that the Palestinian Authority has received more per capita aid than did Europe under the Marshall Plan. This astonishing largesse has disappeared into lavish villas for party bosses and guns for the multiple militias Arafat established.

The West is rushing to bolster Abbas. Israel will release hundreds of millions in tax monies. The United States and EU will be pouring in aid. All praise Abbas as a cross between Anwar Sadat and Simon Bolivar. Fine. We have no choice but to support him. But we should insist upon reasonable benchmarks of both moderation and good governance.

Abbas is not Hamas. But he does not represent the second coming either. We can prop him up only so much. In the end, the only one who can make a success of the West Bank is Abbas himself. This is his chance. His last chance.

Charles Krauthammer's e-mail address is letters@charleskrauthammer.com

 

[Last modified June 21, 2007, 23:05:06]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by jg 06/22/07 09:17 AM
I have a question,why isn't Israel labeled as a terrorist regime when it is a well known fact that they have nuclear weapons but has not been sanctioned to have them or acknowledge possession to the United Nations which they are apart of?
by jg 06/22/07 09:12 AM
I find it hilarious that the US pushed for free elections in the M.E. but when the PEOPLE choose a party that we don't control they are then labeled terrorist.The same will happen in Iraq,when the Iraqis elect a party that we dont have under or thump
by KG 06/22/07 07:14 AM
same old, same old. Israel is the most powerful military in the M.E., yet is always portayed as a victim, even tho they continue thier policies of genocide and land theft.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT