St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

St. Petersburg to cut 50 jobs, spending

The wide-ranging cuts are a result of the state tax overhaul approved last week.

By AARON SHAROCKMAN
Published June 23, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT
Related links
  • See a budget summary
    Want to crunch the numbers on your own, or get an idea of what lies in store for a favorite agency or event? Download a copy of the city's general fund budget summary (PDF).

ST. PETERSBURG -- The city will lay off 50 government workers and eliminate an additional 20 unfilled jobs, Mayor Rick Baker said Friday, delivering what officials promised would be the grisly impact of the state's mandated budget cuts.

The layoffs will affect more than 15 city departments, including the library system, parks departments and the mayor's office. In concert with other budget cuts, the work force reduction will trim nearly $13.8-million from next year's budget if approved by the City Council.

The wide-ranging cuts are among the first specific consequences of the state tax overhaul passed last week and signed by Gov. Charlie Crist into law Thursday. In Tampa, Mayor Pam Iorio said Friday her government also would be laying off employees.

In St. Petersburg, library and adult recreation center hours will be reduced and recreation user fees will increase, Baker said.

The mayor also proposed eliminating $2.55-million in city subsidies that serve more than 200 local social service, not-for-profit and arts organizations.

Baker said the cuts may lower the city's tax rate about 12 percent starting Oct. 1. That would translate to about $125 in savings for a city homeowner with a $200,000 home.

The budget is subject to City Council approval; the layoffs are not.

"This is not an easy time for the city," Baker told council members during a work session that drew so much attention it had to be moved into the main council chambers. "But our city has been through not easy times before."

Layoffs had always been a possibility, but Baker had not said publicly before Friday how many jobs would be cut from the city's 3,000-person work force.

Department managers, and in some cases the mayor himself, began informing employees of the news this week.

Most of the positions will be eliminated before the new budget year begins Oct. 1, Baker said.

Employees who lose jobs will receive a severance package, up to three months' pay for longtime employees and a month's salary for relatively new hires.

It's little consolation for those soon out of a job, said Charles Clark, trustee with the Service Employees International Union Local 220, which represents 1,800 city employees.

Clark said the union will meet with city officials Tuesday in hopes of stopping at least some job losses.

"We would really liked to have had or have an opportunity to look at other ways to reduce the budget as opposed to laying off workers," Clark said.

A list of specific employees being forced out was not available Friday, city officials said.

Twelve members of the city's code enforcement staff -- one-fourth of the department -- will be laid off. Eight positions in the development services department are being eliminated, as are five full-time library jobs, officials said.

Employees remaining, excluding police officers and firefighters, will receive 2 percent pay increases next year.

Although that money -- $2.3-million -- would have saved jobs, Baker said it would have made it more difficult for the city to compete for qualified employees.

"You could have probably frozen salaries and let fewer people go," said Baker, who already has cut 57 city positions since taking office in 2001, including a series of layoffs in 2002.

"But my position is we have great employees in the city," he said. "I want to make sure we keep great employees in the city. They have choices, too."

The mayor distributed a six-page list of proposed budget cuts and fee increases. The list dealt with the big -- eliminating $2.55-million in outside spending -- and the small.

Among the cuts were $4,800 the city spends on a suite at Tropicana Field, $5,000 for an exchange program with St. Petersburg's Japanese sister city and half of the City Council's $40,000 travel budget.

Baker proposed raising fees at Boyd Hill Nature Preserve, swimming pool facilities and youth camps.

Fees may also rise to use marina and airport facilities and to park downtown. Specific rate increases were not discussed.

The city projected its general fund budget to remain flat at a total of $223.9-million.

On Friday, City Council members suggested more places spending could be reduced, while some fought to restore funding for some outside agencies.

"After we get through this, there's still going to be fallout," said council member Jeff Danner, saying cutting social service funding may create more crime and neighborhood problems.

Baker told council members the state has left the city little choice. "The reality is you and I don't have the ability to print money," Baker said.

Aaron Sharockman can be reached at asharockman@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2273.

FAST FACTS: Effects of mayor's budget proposal
The mayor presented his budget proposal Friday. It included:

  • Layoffs: 70 full-time and 18 part-time positions will be eliminated; 12 full-time positions will be cut from code enforcement.
  • Increased fees: Recreation, swimming fees will increase; so might downtown parking fees.
  • Decreased services: Library and adult recreation center hours will be shortened; neighborhood grants cut in half.
  • Social services: A $2.55-million cut (First Night, Florida Orchestra, Creative Clay, St. Petersburg Pregnancy Center -- more than 200 groups in all).

FAST FACTS: Other cities' plans
Here's where other Tampa Bay area governments budget planning stands:

  • Clearwater: Releasing budget book to City Council June 30. Looking for about $7.5-million in cuts.
  • Tampa: Meeting Tuesday. Mayor Pam Iorio said Friday government employees will be laid off.
  • Pinellas Park: Draft budget moving through a citizens' review committee.
  • Dunedin: Workshops scheduled next month.
  • Pinellas County: Planning to rely mainly on reserves. Commissioners meet Tuesday.
  • Hillsborough County: Still digesting impact. Commissioners on recess until next month.

[Last modified June 23, 2007, 01:07:50]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by JOHN 06/24/07 05:31 PM
Sharon, you are living in lala land. These tax cut hardly cuts enough. The real cuts will come next year one way or another. If the bill fails in Jan., the cuts may come even deeper through statutory rollbacks. The best proposal so far is the 2.5% pl
by John 06/24/07 05:27 PM
Speaker Marco Rubio of the FL House of Representative has it right. It's not about what government wants. It's about what the people can afford. Everyone has to live within their means including government. LET THE TAXCUTS BEGIN!!
by Sharon 06/23/07 09:28 PM
You are going to ruin library service so you can give people $125? This is ridiculous! I say it is time to RAISE TAXES. Add library jobs, don't delete them! I would gladly give up my stupid homestead exemption for a full time library job! Raise taxes
by chris 06/23/07 08:22 PM
Wait til the collective impacts of underfunded services take hold. Remember the homelessness and jail overcrowding that resulted from cuts to mental health facilities in the 80s? That was child's play. Hope the tourists enjoy the beaches more.
by joyce 06/23/07 08:06 PM
CRY ME A RIVER. Why don't you cut your investigative department into the unjust SOH. Must be costing a bundle, braging about how you have expanded, Costing a bundle at taxpayers expense. Cry me a river. .
by TJ 06/23/07 08:01 PM
TOO BAD. I cannot afford to keep my home and family maintained. Who has time to use any services. What did you do in 2001 and 2002. You did not cry the blues.
by jackie 06/23/07 07:59 PM
Should I pay overassessed, unfair taxes to justify some county job. I am trying to just keep my house. I know of some county jobs that are unnecessary. CUT THE FAT NOW!
by Chris 06/23/07 07:04 PM
I agree that cutting the Code Compliance staff is a big mistake as it will certainly lead to a decline in property conditions then values. Cut from the top first (Dep. Mayors, Directors, etc.)
by Dawn 06/23/07 06:39 PM
Big tax breaks for everyone huh? Reduce property taxes so that people can afford to live here...get rid of jobs so they can't pay for what they have. Made sense to me stop complaining about the damn property taxes Live with them or move!!!!!!
by Tony 06/23/07 06:35 PM
When you all vote for the Super Homestead exemption we are all going to feel the pain. Don't expect your sidewalks, potholes to be fixed, parks to be open, fire rescue to respond in a reasonable amount of time, etc. It's going to kill our state.
by Bill 06/23/07 06:12 PM
Does anyone actually think the city would be better off with 300 less emploees? Thats just crazy. Everyone wanted dog parks, more public pools,skate parks, sunken gardens,the airport....etc But some how its the city employees that did you wrong.
by Steve 06/23/07 05:44 PM
Did the city keep half of their travel budget, so they can at least go to a few retreats on our dime? There is enough problems in St Pete w/ property taxes. They really do not need to be going any where. Fix the problems at home first.
by Kevin 06/23/07 05:42 PM
Keep Cutting! And if the former 50 city employees are looking for work, I'd be happy to offer them a copy of the Times classifieds gratis
by John 06/23/07 05:37 PM
....all the cuts from the current and January's tax cut proposal from the Florida legislature. You would likely not even have to fire anyone. Second, let attrition trim certain city departments. The city has been on a drunken spending rampage. STOP!
by John 06/23/07 05:34 PM
...money could be saved by the city. Do we really need 48 people in code enforcement in the first place. Here's what they should do first. Freeze all salary increases so they can catch up to recent windfall raises. Just that is enough for probably...
by John 06/23/07 05:30 PM
With the huge salary increases the last few years, the city should have at the minimum froze salaries not raised them. That would have probably saved 40 positions. They should have frozen police & firemen's pay too. This is ridiculous how much more..
by Joe Bob 06/23/07 04:14 PM
To Matt and others who continually harp on returning to budget levels from several years ago - are you really this clueless? Do you not understand that costs have risen for everything?
by Jim 06/23/07 04:03 PM
My taxes went up by 75% in the last 3 years, and I get no more services. To me this is a good thing. Government is not a corporation that has a main goal to grow. Services they offer typically are for people who pay little in taxes.
by Mike 06/23/07 03:55 PM
So the line gets longer at the food stamp office, and credit cards along with home and car loans will not get paid. When you lay someone off, EVERYONE pays for it. I bet your life style would change Rick Baker if you were fired...............
by Brian 06/23/07 03:53 PM
As someone who is paying 3 times the amount of taxes as some of my neighbors, let the cuts begin!
by Heidi 06/23/07 03:40 PM
About two years The people hired to work in the county received heavy raises upon hire?? Trinkets made to hand out cost taxpayers a fortune, whose idea was that???? Cutting jos I ? look for the real waste.
by r 06/23/07 03:37 PM
Perhaps some of us in our fine city are getting tired of some planned activities -- such as Gay Pride! Please return wholesome events for ALL to enjoy!!
by Pamela 06/23/07 03:12 PM
Big deal- glad I didn't eat breakfast this morning before I glanced at the front page! I almost threw the horrid thing into the recycle bin without even reading it. This is complete BALONEY- we received NO tax relief- INCREASE THE SALES TAX, FOOLS!!
by Laura 06/23/07 03:01 PM
Of all these people commenting - has anyone looked at their city's budget and formed a rally to help them cut the budget?
by tracy 06/23/07 02:33 PM
now the scare tactics begin.these jobs were put in place by the over taxation collected through-out the years anyways.they have to meet with the workers to find out where to cut the fat. they would be surprised how much the workers know where tocut
by Brian 06/23/07 02:24 PM
Hey JT, your not thinking. If you cut pensions and go to 401K then you have to raise salaries because many municipal workers take lower pay due to pensions..Due away with pension. You will need to increase salary to compete with public sector.
by Kathy 06/23/07 12:28 PM
What ever happened to Crist's proposal to cut insurance? Thanks, Governor & Mayor. Oh, wait, insurance PACS got Crist in. You've screwed the middle again. But at least we have the Grand Prix. Please, fire yourselves first. Then go to confession.
by Marie 06/23/07 12:04 PM
I understand cuts had to be made, and I have great respect for Mayor Baker. But this is a terrible time to cut social services. They're needed now more than ever. We need fewer expensive condos and more affordable housing.
by James 06/23/07 12:01 PM
The mayors are going to be spanking us for 7 more months so we won't vote for the real cuts coming. Nice try. We'll get real in January.
by Jose 06/23/07 11:54 AM
HOw about some easy cuts Mayor? At least charge Event Makers/Ye Mistic Krew the cost of Gasparilla since they are making $millions on selling tickets to OUR parade and the taxpayers incur over $400,000 a year in expenses!
by Bob 06/23/07 11:42 AM
Most govt agencies could lose 20% of staff and not miss a beat. Losing fat is never easy since it builds up over time. Mgmt salaries are always sacred. Why? The rank & file always suffer, but the big $$ do nothing jobs always survive. No entitlement!
by mikey 06/23/07 11:35 AM
Please don't cut any of Joe Waller's gang!
by Daniel 06/23/07 11:25 AM
What is it with you people that you despise government employees so much? I have been working for a local government for 6 years and have never worked harder or had as much stress. I have to work during hurricanes to protect YOU and your families.
by PJ 06/23/07 11:20 AM
Time to cut from the top down. Start with salary cuts for heads of depts, the mayor, deputy mayor, police chief, fire chief and Admin offices. I could cut the budget in 2 days and save services to the people..Time for the big shots to pick up the tab
by Dan T 06/23/07 11:02 AM
It is clear these clowns don't get it. These "cuts" are nothing. Increased fees will keep the budget fat. This is gov't self-preservation. These officials are absolutely DEAF! We must vote them out!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT