St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Bill would say bye to gas guzzlers

A Senate bill requires more fuel efficiency from automakers.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published June 23, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - The cars, SUVS and pickups people will buy in the years ahead are likely to use less fuel, and many will rely on ethanol or household electricity instead of gasoline.

The energy legislation pushed through the Senate this week provides a road map to the future, demanding higher automobile fuel economy, mandating huge increases in ethanol as a motor fuel and supporting more research into building "plug-in" hybrid-electric vehicles.

While Senate Republicans complained that the bill does nothing to increase domestic oil production, Democrats said that's because the nation must move energy policy away from its heavy reliance on oil.

The Senate voted 65-27 in favor of the bill late Thursday night. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., voted for it, and Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., voted against it. The House is preparing its own version.

The Senate bill requires automakers to increase fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon, about a 40 percent increase over what cars, SUVs and small trucks are required to achieve now. It would lump all the vehicles under a single regulation, but also give manufacturers flexibility so large SUVs wouldn't have to meet the same requirements as smaller cars.

And for the first time, the president would have to find ways to cut oil demand by 20 percent of what it is expected to be in 2017 - a target President Bush has embraced - and attain further reductions after that.

"The goal is to replace fossil fuels with alternative fuels and use conservation, " said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., who was involved in the bill.

Automakers, lobbying hard against the fuel economy provision in the Senate bill, expressed continued concern Friday about their ability to meet the requirements without changing the mix of cars they will be able to provide in the showrooms of 2020.

"There's no way you can get those numbers without a dramatic shift in consumer choice, " said Mark LaNeve, General Motors' vice president of North America sales, service and marketing. "We don't know how it's attainable."

Fast Facts:

Energy bill

The Senate energy legislation includes:

-An increase in automobile fuel economy requirements to a fleetwide average of 35 mpg by 2020 from the current requirements of 27.5 mpg for cars and 22.2 mpg for SUVs and small trucks.

-A requirement that half of new cars manufactured by 2015 be capable of running on 85 percent ethanol or biodiesel fuels.

-A requirement to produce 36-billion gallons a year of ethanol, as a substitute for gasoline, by 2022, a sevenfold increase over 2006.

-New appliance and lighting efficiency standards.

[Last modified June 23, 2007, 00:13:19]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by JT 06/23/07 11:31 PM
I like how a bunch of subway riding, bed wetting, anti-American socialists come up with this stuff.If the elitist in europe float your boat take one back across the atlantic. There is plenty of oil, just drill it.Don't like it walk. Let freedom drive
by Laura 06/23/07 02:40 PM
And Pres. Bush couldn't do this his first year in office? No wonder we are so far behind Europe. Thanks
by Kevin 06/23/07 07:27 AM
Guess what LaNeve! There is a lot of consumer choice shifting right now! Ask Toyota! Ever heard of them? Sounds like GM needs to replace your non-visionary ass!
by Carl 06/23/07 06:28 AM
All government does is talk because big money is involved. I get miles to the gallon in the city, and 45 on trips. People with money do not care as long as they have there big horsepower hogs to drive. Good example. Hummer
by Brad 06/23/07 03:04 AM
It has not been said often enough ... the cost of ill thought out environmental policies are often borne by low/middle income families.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT