Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Girl sues school over ban on chastity ring
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published June 23, 2007
LONDON - A teenage girl banned from wearing a chastity ring in class took her case to Britain's High Court on Friday, arguing that her school had violated her religious freedom. Lydia Playfoot, a 16-year-old student at Millais School in Horsham, about 40 miles south of London, wears the ring as a sign of her commitment to abstain from sex until marriage. Many Christian teenagers worldwide wear the chastity rings, which were inspired by "The Silver Ring Thing, " an abstinence program launched in the United States in 1996. The school said the ring fell outside its uniform policy, which makes exceptions for Muslims wearing head scarves and Sikhs wearing steel bracelets. Headmaster Leon Nettley said chastity rings do not form an integral part of the Christian faith. That violated Playfoot's freedom of religion, her lawyer, Paul Diamond, argued before the court. "Secular authorities and institutions cannot be arbiters of religious faith, " he said. In a written submission to the hearing, Lydia said her school did not afford equal rights to Christians as it did to other faiths. "At my school, Muslims are allowed to wear headscarves and other faiths can wear bangles and other types of jewelry, and it feels like Christians are being discriminated against, " she told British Broadcasting Corp. radio's Today program. Nettley denied the charge. The ring "is not a Christian symbol, and is not required to be worn by any branch within Christianity, " he said in his own written statement.
[Last modified June 23, 2007, 00:20:34]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Tom
|
06/25/07 12:26 PM
|
|
This is typical of Libbie Communism. Denounce Christianity and allow everything else in the name of Diversity, the new religion.
|
|
by Dave
|
06/24/07 12:38 AM
|
|
It's only the Christians that have to put up with this kind of nonsense. I'd like to see if the school has a similar policy for any muslim girls wearing a hijab. Outside of Iran and Saudi Arabia, it's not required for women to wear a hijab.
|
|
by Robin
|
06/23/07 09:48 PM
|
|
It is a double standard. They need to allow her to wear symbols that confirm a conviction in her faith.
|
|
by Diane
|
06/23/07 07:05 PM
|
|
That's as bad as the Christians being against abortions and homosexuals. Well, who has less abortions than homosexuals? You'd think they'd make natural allies!
|
|
by Joyce
|
06/23/07 06:40 PM
|
|
At least the girl will probably be out of school by the time this is resolved. Too bad more kids don't take their virginity this seriously. Once it's gone-that's it.
|
|
by Marie
|
06/23/07 06:38 PM
|
|
CS-no one said they banned her from wearing a cross. This is NOT a trendy jewelry statement, but her commitment to do the Christian thing, thereby making it a Christian symbol of her faith to GOD, and also to herself. May GOD bless her, and you, also
|
|
by Jim
|
06/23/07 05:47 PM
|
|
Sounds like that school is about to take the French approach - banning scarves and steel bracelets. A uniform is a uniform. Got a problem with it? Go to a private school.
|
|
by Carl
|
06/23/07 02:18 PM
|
|
She should move to South Carolina. They can't get enough merchandise if someone say it has something to do with God.
It's that way here. Is it like that in Florida?
|
|
by Ralph
|
06/23/07 11:03 AM
|
|
This is in the UK. They do not live under any constitutional rights where there is a separation of church and state. They need the ACLU.
|
|
by Joyce
|
06/23/07 09:56 AM
|
|
The child is trying to do the right day and she is being persecuted for it. What does wearing steel bracelets have to do with GOD? Next we won't be allowed to wear crosses as a symbol of our faith and devotion to GOD. Promiscuity is better than GOD?
|
|
by CS
|
06/23/07 09:34 AM
|
|
They did NOT ban her from wearing a cross. It is a trendy jewelry statement not a Christian symbol.
|
|
by Carl
|
06/23/07 06:20 AM
|
|
Just like the US, push Christianity out but let the foreigners come in and demand their rights.
|
|